Objective：To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the treatment of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome （CP/CPPS）. Methods- The randomized controlled trials （RCTs） about the treatment for CP/CPPS all o...Objective：To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the treatment of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome （CP/CPPS）. Methods- The randomized controlled trials （RCTs） about the treatment for CP/CPPS all over the world were searched. MEDLINE （January 1966 to June 2007）, EMBASE （January 1988 to June 2007）, and 4 Chinese databases were electronically searched. The studies included in the refer- ences of eligible studies were additionally searched. Two reviewers independently screened the studies for eli- gibility, evaluated the quality and extracted the data from the eligible studies, with confirmation by cross- checking. Divergences of opinion were settled by discussion or consulted by the experts. Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 4.2 software. Results： Twelve original studies involving 1 003 participants met inclusion criteria. Compared with placebo, alpha-blockers could improve the symptoms of CP/CPPS obvious- ly with WMD of NIH-CPSI, total score and pain score were -4.10 （95%CI： -6. 92 to -1.28） and -1.68 （95 %CI： -2.54 to -0. 82）. Antibiotics could not improve the symptoms obviously with WMD of NIH-CP- SI; total score and pain score were -2.71 （95%CI： -4. 78 to -0. 64） and -0.86 （95%CI： -2.07 to 0.36）. Flavoxate could not improve the NIH-CPSI total score obviously, but could relieve the pain, with WMD of NIH-CPSI total score and pain score being -2.96 （95%CI： -5.17 to -0. 74） and --2.31 （95%CI.. -4.05 to 0.03）. Prostat could improve the NIH-CPSI total score obviously, but could not relieve the pain, with WMD of NIH-CPSI total score and pain score being --7. 60 （95%CI.. -9. 97 to -5.23） and -2. 02 （95%CI： -4.07 to 0. 04）. Conclusion： Drug intervention could improve total symptoms of CP/CPPS in some degree, but no universally effective treatment is available that can prove significant lasting benefit for all the symptoms of CP/CPPS. Future RCT must use an appropriate sample size and optimal duration and fol- low-up of participants. It is important to improve the quality of internal original studies.展开更多
文摘Objective：To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the treatment of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome （CP/CPPS）. Methods- The randomized controlled trials （RCTs） about the treatment for CP/CPPS all over the world were searched. MEDLINE （January 1966 to June 2007）, EMBASE （January 1988 to June 2007）, and 4 Chinese databases were electronically searched. The studies included in the refer- ences of eligible studies were additionally searched. Two reviewers independently screened the studies for eli- gibility, evaluated the quality and extracted the data from the eligible studies, with confirmation by cross- checking. Divergences of opinion were settled by discussion or consulted by the experts. Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 4.2 software. Results： Twelve original studies involving 1 003 participants met inclusion criteria. Compared with placebo, alpha-blockers could improve the symptoms of CP/CPPS obvious- ly with WMD of NIH-CPSI, total score and pain score were -4.10 （95%CI： -6. 92 to -1.28） and -1.68 （95 %CI： -2.54 to -0. 82）. Antibiotics could not improve the symptoms obviously with WMD of NIH-CP- SI; total score and pain score were -2.71 （95%CI： -4. 78 to -0. 64） and -0.86 （95%CI： -2.07 to 0.36）. Flavoxate could not improve the NIH-CPSI total score obviously, but could relieve the pain, with WMD of NIH-CPSI total score and pain score being -2.96 （95%CI： -5.17 to -0. 74） and --2.31 （95%CI.. -4.05 to 0.03）. Prostat could improve the NIH-CPSI total score obviously, but could not relieve the pain, with WMD of NIH-CPSI total score and pain score being --7. 60 （95%CI.. -9. 97 to -5.23） and -2. 02 （95%CI： -4.07 to 0. 04）. Conclusion： Drug intervention could improve total symptoms of CP/CPPS in some degree, but no universally effective treatment is available that can prove significant lasting benefit for all the symptoms of CP/CPPS. Future RCT must use an appropriate sample size and optimal duration and fol- low-up of participants. It is important to improve the quality of internal original studies.
