剩余价值学说所体现的剩余逻辑是对资本主义代表的化约逻辑批判的坚实基础。在观念论中,对同一性、绝对等的追求的化约逻辑背后纠缠着隐秘的剩余逻辑。马克思通过历史唯物主义转向将批判的起点确定为现实的感性的人的活动,通过剩余价值...剩余价值学说所体现的剩余逻辑是对资本主义代表的化约逻辑批判的坚实基础。在观念论中,对同一性、绝对等的追求的化约逻辑背后纠缠着隐秘的剩余逻辑。马克思通过历史唯物主义转向将批判的起点确定为现实的感性的人的活动,通过剩余价值学说揭示了剩余逻辑的结构性和不可化约性,破除了化约形式的神圣外观,为资本主义批判提供了典例。阿多诺、齐泽克、奈格里和哈特他们所代表的资本主义批判没有处理好化约逻辑和剩余逻辑的关系,因而表现为片面的深刻走入各自不恰当的迷思。对于这类迷思的突破就是要重新回到马克思,回到马克思资本主义批判的维度中汲取营养和教益。The surplus logic reflected in the theory of surplus value is a solid foundation for criticizing the reductionist logic represented by capitalism. In the theory of ideas, there is a hidden residual logic entangled behind the reductionist logic of the pursuit of identity, absoluteness, and so on. Marx shifted from historical materialism to defining the starting point of criticism as the sensory activities of real people. Through the theory of surplus value, he revealed the structural and irreducible nature of surplus logic, breaking away from the sacred appearance of reduced forms and providing a model for the criticism of capitalism. Adorno, Zizek, Negri, and Hart’s critique of capitalism did not handle the relationship between reductionist logic and residual logic well, resulting in a one-sided and profound approach to their respective inappropriate misconceptions. The breakthrough to such myths is to return to Marx and draw nourishment and lessons from the dimension of Marx’s critique of capitalism.展开更多
文摘剩余价值学说所体现的剩余逻辑是对资本主义代表的化约逻辑批判的坚实基础。在观念论中,对同一性、绝对等的追求的化约逻辑背后纠缠着隐秘的剩余逻辑。马克思通过历史唯物主义转向将批判的起点确定为现实的感性的人的活动,通过剩余价值学说揭示了剩余逻辑的结构性和不可化约性,破除了化约形式的神圣外观,为资本主义批判提供了典例。阿多诺、齐泽克、奈格里和哈特他们所代表的资本主义批判没有处理好化约逻辑和剩余逻辑的关系,因而表现为片面的深刻走入各自不恰当的迷思。对于这类迷思的突破就是要重新回到马克思,回到马克思资本主义批判的维度中汲取营养和教益。The surplus logic reflected in the theory of surplus value is a solid foundation for criticizing the reductionist logic represented by capitalism. In the theory of ideas, there is a hidden residual logic entangled behind the reductionist logic of the pursuit of identity, absoluteness, and so on. Marx shifted from historical materialism to defining the starting point of criticism as the sensory activities of real people. Through the theory of surplus value, he revealed the structural and irreducible nature of surplus logic, breaking away from the sacred appearance of reduced forms and providing a model for the criticism of capitalism. Adorno, Zizek, Negri, and Hart’s critique of capitalism did not handle the relationship between reductionist logic and residual logic well, resulting in a one-sided and profound approach to their respective inappropriate misconceptions. The breakthrough to such myths is to return to Marx and draw nourishment and lessons from the dimension of Marx’s critique of capitalism.
