期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
资本、政策与地方空间:北京市文化空间研究——以798艺术园区为例
1
作者 樊韶杰 《北京文化创意》 2024年第3期4-10,共7页
北京文化空间发展的三十多年间,其从最初的自发性聚集,后在政策引导、经济资本、地方空间的共同作用下,逐渐被赋予了提升北京市文化软实力、文化产业转型升级的意义。北京市文化空间的变迁是中国宏观文化空间变化的时代缩影,同时也是中... 北京文化空间发展的三十多年间,其从最初的自发性聚集,后在政策引导、经济资本、地方空间的共同作用下,逐渐被赋予了提升北京市文化软实力、文化产业转型升级的意义。北京市文化空间的变迁是中国宏观文化空间变化的时代缩影,同时也是中国文化产业发展、文化软实力增长的见证者与直接体现。本文以798艺术园区为研究样本,围绕“北京的文化空间是如何形成的?政策、资本和地方空间是如何影响艺术园区发展的?”几个问题展开研究,厘清了北京市文化空间的发展逻辑,为北京市文化空间的可持续发展提供借鉴与参考。 展开更多
关键词 北京文化空间 政策引导 资本干预 可持续发展
原文传递
Belt or network?The spatial structure and shaping mechanism of the Great Wall cultural belt in Beijing 被引量:4
2
作者 WANG Fang XU Yi-yi +1 位作者 ZHAO Ye ZHU Xiao-hua 《Journal of Mountain Science》 SCIE CSCD 2018年第9期2027-2042,共16页
The relationship between cross-regional cultural landscapes does not currently receive enough attention in cultural landscape conservation. Cultural landscapes in China are faced with the crisis of fragmentation and i... The relationship between cross-regional cultural landscapes does not currently receive enough attention in cultural landscape conservation. Cultural landscapes in China are faced with the crisis of fragmentation and islanding, which makes it necessary to strengthen the idea of integrated conservation. The Great Wall cultural belt in Beijing is a cross-regional linear cultural landscape in the northwest mountainous area of Beijing. With the Great Wall as a link connecting the surrounding natural, social, and cultural resources to form a banded structure, it has the typical and practical significance of integrated conservation. Based on the theory of the cultural landscape security pattern and its ‘node – setting – connection' model, this research studies the spatial structure and shaping mechanism of the Great Wall cultural belt in Beijing from the perspective of tourist flow, using Flickr geo-tagged photos and Wikiloc tracks. The results identify the core nodes and intermediate nodes of the Great Wall cultural belt in Beijing and show that it has a multicore, multi-group hierarchical nesting structure differing from the geographic space, which has groups following the evolution orbit of ‘linear string – circumnuclear star – complete network.' To explain the differences between the cultural association network(CAN) and the geospatial network(GSN), we find that the cultural associations between nodes rely on geophysical channels, including heritage corridors and traffic passages, as physical carriers, but the nodes' attraction and their setting elements, containing natural geography environments, settlements, administrative divisions, etc., change the channel resistance, so CAN and GSN present different characteristics. From the perspective of systematic and spatial network thoughts, this study has made an attempt to adopt new analysis and research methods to achieve the integrated conservation and inheritance of linear cultural landscapes in mountainous areas. 展开更多
关键词 Network analysis BELT Cultural landscape securityMountainous landscapeGreat Wall culturalpattern Geotagging
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部