To study the risk factors for early complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy （PD）. Methods： Two hundred patients undergoing PD at our hospital between December 1996 and September 2002 were reviewed retrospective...To study the risk factors for early complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy （PD）. Methods： Two hundred patients undergoing PD at our hospital between December 1996 and September 2002 were reviewed retrospectively. Standard PD was performed on 176 cases, standard PD with extended lymphadenectomy on 24 patients, whereas pylorus-preserving PD was not used. An end-toside combined with mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy was performed on the patients with a hard pancreas and a dilated pancreatic duct, and a traditional end-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy on the patients with a soft pancreas and a non-dilated duct. The risk factors with the potential to affect the incidence of complications were analyzed with SAS 8.12 software. Logistic regression was then used to determine the effect of multiple factors on early complications. Results： The overall rate of the major com- plications was 21% （42/200）, with the failure of pancreaticojejunal anastomosis being the most frequently encountered. Age （odds ratio [OR] 2.162）, diabetes mellitus （OR 4.086）, total serum bilirubin level （OR 7.556）, end-to-end pancreaticojejunostomy （OR 2.616）, T tube through the choledochojejunostomy （OR 0.100）, and blood transfusion over 1000 mL （OR 2.410） were the significant risk factors for the morbidity. Conclusion： The results from published series concerning morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy are not comparable because of lack of homogeneity between them. The knowledge of the complications rate in each particular department turns out essentially to provide the patient with tailored information about risks before surgery. Additionally, management of postoperative complications is essential for improving the results of this operation.展开更多
AIM： To determine the effects of high osmolarity contrast media （HOCM） and iso-osmolar contrast media （CM） application, with or without pressure, on hepato-pancreato-biliary （HPB） system. METHODS： Sixty rats w...AIM： To determine the effects of high osmolarity contrast media （HOCM） and iso-osmolar contrast media （CM） application, with or without pressure, on hepato-pancreato-biliary （HPB） system. METHODS： Sixty rats were divided into six equal groups as follows： Group i： （0.9% NaCl, control）, Group 2： （diatrizoate meglumine Na, ionic HOCM, Urographin）, Group 3： （iodixanol, iso-osmolar nonionic CM, Visipaque）; each of which was applied without pressure, whereas the animals of the remaining three groups （1p, 2p, 3p） were subjected to the same CM with pressure. We performed a duodenal puncture and introduced a catheter into the ampulla. After the catheterization, 0.2 mL CM or 0.9% NaCI was injected with or without pressure. Blood samples were taken for biochemical evaluations. The histopathological examinations of liver, common bile duct, and pancreas were performed. RESULTS： There were no significant differences between the six groups for blood amylase, alanine aminotransferases, aspartate aminotransferases, bilirubin levels （P 〉 0.05）. Alkaline phosphatase and γ glutamyl transaminase levels were higher （P 〈 0.05） in the Urographin groups （2, 2p） than the Visipaque groups （3, 3p）, or control groups （1, 1p）. Hepatocyte necrosis, portal area inflammation, and Kupffer＇s cell hyperplasia were higher （P 〈 0.05） in the study groups than the control group. However, there were no significant differences （P 〉 0.05） between HOCM （2, 2p） and iso-osmolar CM （3, 3p） groups. Bile duct proliferation and regeneration in the Urographin groups （2, 2p） were significantly higher （P 〈 0.05） than the Visipaque~ groups （3, 3p） or the control groups （1, lp）. Although CM caused minor damage to the pancreas, there were no statistically significant differences （P 〉 0.05） between the groups. Application of the CM with pressure did not cause additional damage to the HPB system. CONCLUSION： Iso-osmolar, non-ionic CM could be more reliable than the ionic HOCM, whereas the application of pressure during the CM application had no effect on the HPB system.展开更多
文摘To study the risk factors for early complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy （PD）. Methods： Two hundred patients undergoing PD at our hospital between December 1996 and September 2002 were reviewed retrospectively. Standard PD was performed on 176 cases, standard PD with extended lymphadenectomy on 24 patients, whereas pylorus-preserving PD was not used. An end-toside combined with mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy was performed on the patients with a hard pancreas and a dilated pancreatic duct, and a traditional end-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy on the patients with a soft pancreas and a non-dilated duct. The risk factors with the potential to affect the incidence of complications were analyzed with SAS 8.12 software. Logistic regression was then used to determine the effect of multiple factors on early complications. Results： The overall rate of the major com- plications was 21% （42/200）, with the failure of pancreaticojejunal anastomosis being the most frequently encountered. Age （odds ratio [OR] 2.162）, diabetes mellitus （OR 4.086）, total serum bilirubin level （OR 7.556）, end-to-end pancreaticojejunostomy （OR 2.616）, T tube through the choledochojejunostomy （OR 0.100）, and blood transfusion over 1000 mL （OR 2.410） were the significant risk factors for the morbidity. Conclusion： The results from published series concerning morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy are not comparable because of lack of homogeneity between them. The knowledge of the complications rate in each particular department turns out essentially to provide the patient with tailored information about risks before surgery. Additionally, management of postoperative complications is essential for improving the results of this operation.
文摘AIM： To determine the effects of high osmolarity contrast media （HOCM） and iso-osmolar contrast media （CM） application, with or without pressure, on hepato-pancreato-biliary （HPB） system. METHODS： Sixty rats were divided into six equal groups as follows： Group i： （0.9% NaCl, control）, Group 2： （diatrizoate meglumine Na, ionic HOCM, Urographin）, Group 3： （iodixanol, iso-osmolar nonionic CM, Visipaque）; each of which was applied without pressure, whereas the animals of the remaining three groups （1p, 2p, 3p） were subjected to the same CM with pressure. We performed a duodenal puncture and introduced a catheter into the ampulla. After the catheterization, 0.2 mL CM or 0.9% NaCI was injected with or without pressure. Blood samples were taken for biochemical evaluations. The histopathological examinations of liver, common bile duct, and pancreas were performed. RESULTS： There were no significant differences between the six groups for blood amylase, alanine aminotransferases, aspartate aminotransferases, bilirubin levels （P 〉 0.05）. Alkaline phosphatase and γ glutamyl transaminase levels were higher （P 〈 0.05） in the Urographin groups （2, 2p） than the Visipaque groups （3, 3p）, or control groups （1, 1p）. Hepatocyte necrosis, portal area inflammation, and Kupffer＇s cell hyperplasia were higher （P 〈 0.05） in the study groups than the control group. However, there were no significant differences （P 〉 0.05） between HOCM （2, 2p） and iso-osmolar CM （3, 3p） groups. Bile duct proliferation and regeneration in the Urographin groups （2, 2p） were significantly higher （P 〈 0.05） than the Visipaque~ groups （3, 3p） or the control groups （1, lp）. Although CM caused minor damage to the pancreas, there were no statistically significant differences （P 〉 0.05） between the groups. Application of the CM with pressure did not cause additional damage to the HPB system. CONCLUSION： Iso-osmolar, non-ionic CM could be more reliable than the ionic HOCM, whereas the application of pressure during the CM application had no effect on the HPB system.
