目的分析长海医院标准卒中救治流程对大血管闭塞急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)患者救治时间的影响。方法回顾性连续选择2013年9月10日至2019年12月31日我院脑血管病中心收治的行血管内治疗的大血管闭塞AIS患者876例,排除病例资料不全者66例,最...目的分析长海医院标准卒中救治流程对大血管闭塞急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)患者救治时间的影响。方法回顾性连续选择2013年9月10日至2019年12月31日我院脑血管病中心收治的行血管内治疗的大血管闭塞AIS患者876例,排除病例资料不全者66例,最终纳入810例。按照是否采用标准卒中救治流程(2018年6月22日起实施)将患者分为研究组(采用标准卒中救治流程,335例)和对照组(未采用标准卒中救治流程,475例)。比较两组患者的入院至静脉溶栓时间(DNT)、入院至股动脉穿刺时间(DPT)、股动脉穿刺至血管再通时间(PRT),以及血管成功再通[改良脑梗死溶栓分级≥2b级]率、术后90 d预后良好[改良Rankin量表评分≤2分]率。结果两组患者的性别、年龄及入院时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。研究组采用静脉溶栓+血管内治疗的患者占比低于对照组[14.3%(48/335)vs 31.2%(148/475),P<0.001]。在行静脉溶栓+血管内治疗的患者中,研究组DNT、DPT、PRT均短于对照组[34.2(28.1,60.4)min vs 53.5(27.0,72.2)min、76.5(55.9,106.4)min vs 97.0(68.9,151.1)min、45.0(37.3,90.4)min vs 78.0(55.4,109.3)min],差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.01);研究组的术后90 d预后良好率、血管成功再通率与对照组相比[66.7%(32/48) vs 57.4%(85/148)、91.7%(44/48) vs 93.2%(138/148)]差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。在直接行血管内治疗的患者中,研究组DPT、PRT也均短于对照组[67.0(50.1,109.0)min vs 87.0(60.8,150.0)min、48.0(43.5,80.8)min vs 74.0(60.3,100.6)min],差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.001);研究组的术后90 d预后良好率、血管成功再通率与对照组相比[54.7%(157/287) vs 52.3%(171/327)、93.0%(267/287) vs 91.1%(298/327)]差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论我院的标准卒中救治流程能显著缩短大血管闭塞AIS患者救治环节中的DNT、DPT和PRT,同时不影响患者的血管成功再通率与术后90 d预后良好率。展开更多
Objective:Early thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke within the therapeutic window is associated with improved clinical outcomes.This study investigated whether optimizing intravenous thrombolytic(IVT)therapy stra...Objective:Early thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke within the therapeutic window is associated with improved clinical outcomes.This study investigated whether optimizing intravenous thrombolytic(IVT)therapy strategies for stroke could reduce treatment delays.Methods:To reduce delays in IVT therapy for ischemic stroke,a series of quality improvement measures were implemented at a tertiary hospital in Hangzhou,Zhejiang Province,from June 2021 to August 2023,which included developing a timeline process management system,forming a nurse-led stroke process management team,providing homogeneous training,standardizing the IVT therapy process for ischemic stroke,and introducing an incentive policy.During the pre-(from June 2021 to February 2022,group A)and post-(from March to November 2022,group B1;from December 2022 to August 2023,group B2[implementation of an additional incentive policy])of the implementation the strategy,the door-tocomputed tomographic angiography(CTA)time(DCT),CTA time,neurology consultation to consent for IVT,CTA-to-needle time(CNT),and door-to-needle time(DNT),the percentage of people who underwent CTA within 20 min,15 min,and 10 min and DNT within 60 min,45 min,and 30 min were collected and compared.Results:Following the implementation of the standardized IVT process management strategy for stroke,the DNT for group B1 and group B2 were 30(24,44)min and 31(24,41)min,respectively,both significantly lower than the 46(38,58)min in group A(P<0.001);the median DCT were both 13 min in group B1 and B2 lower than 17min in group A(P<0.001);the median CTA were 12 min in Group B1 and 9 min in Group B2 lower than 14 min in group A(P<0.001);similar results were observed during the neurology consultation to obtain consent for IVT and CNT.Compared with group A,the proportion of DCT20 min,15 min,and 10 min was higher in groups B1 and B2(P<0.05),and the same result was observed at DNT60 min,45 min,and 30 min(P<0.05).However,the additional incentive policy did not significantly differ between Group B2 and Group B1.Conclusions:Optimizing IVT therapy for ischemic stroke is a feasible approach to limit the DNT to 30 min in ischemic stroke,significantly reducing delays within the therapeutic window and increasing the number of patients meeting target time segments.Additionally,generating a timeline for the IVT therapy process by scanning positioning quick response codes was a significant breakthrough in achieving the informatization of IVT quality management for stroke.展开更多
文摘目的分析长海医院标准卒中救治流程对大血管闭塞急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)患者救治时间的影响。方法回顾性连续选择2013年9月10日至2019年12月31日我院脑血管病中心收治的行血管内治疗的大血管闭塞AIS患者876例,排除病例资料不全者66例,最终纳入810例。按照是否采用标准卒中救治流程(2018年6月22日起实施)将患者分为研究组(采用标准卒中救治流程,335例)和对照组(未采用标准卒中救治流程,475例)。比较两组患者的入院至静脉溶栓时间(DNT)、入院至股动脉穿刺时间(DPT)、股动脉穿刺至血管再通时间(PRT),以及血管成功再通[改良脑梗死溶栓分级≥2b级]率、术后90 d预后良好[改良Rankin量表评分≤2分]率。结果两组患者的性别、年龄及入院时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。研究组采用静脉溶栓+血管内治疗的患者占比低于对照组[14.3%(48/335)vs 31.2%(148/475),P<0.001]。在行静脉溶栓+血管内治疗的患者中,研究组DNT、DPT、PRT均短于对照组[34.2(28.1,60.4)min vs 53.5(27.0,72.2)min、76.5(55.9,106.4)min vs 97.0(68.9,151.1)min、45.0(37.3,90.4)min vs 78.0(55.4,109.3)min],差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.01);研究组的术后90 d预后良好率、血管成功再通率与对照组相比[66.7%(32/48) vs 57.4%(85/148)、91.7%(44/48) vs 93.2%(138/148)]差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。在直接行血管内治疗的患者中,研究组DPT、PRT也均短于对照组[67.0(50.1,109.0)min vs 87.0(60.8,150.0)min、48.0(43.5,80.8)min vs 74.0(60.3,100.6)min],差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.001);研究组的术后90 d预后良好率、血管成功再通率与对照组相比[54.7%(157/287) vs 52.3%(171/327)、93.0%(267/287) vs 91.1%(298/327)]差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论我院的标准卒中救治流程能显著缩短大血管闭塞AIS患者救治环节中的DNT、DPT和PRT,同时不影响患者的血管成功再通率与术后90 d预后良好率。
基金supported by Zhejiang Provincial Medical and Health Science and Technology Plan Project(2023KY448).
文摘Objective:Early thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke within the therapeutic window is associated with improved clinical outcomes.This study investigated whether optimizing intravenous thrombolytic(IVT)therapy strategies for stroke could reduce treatment delays.Methods:To reduce delays in IVT therapy for ischemic stroke,a series of quality improvement measures were implemented at a tertiary hospital in Hangzhou,Zhejiang Province,from June 2021 to August 2023,which included developing a timeline process management system,forming a nurse-led stroke process management team,providing homogeneous training,standardizing the IVT therapy process for ischemic stroke,and introducing an incentive policy.During the pre-(from June 2021 to February 2022,group A)and post-(from March to November 2022,group B1;from December 2022 to August 2023,group B2[implementation of an additional incentive policy])of the implementation the strategy,the door-tocomputed tomographic angiography(CTA)time(DCT),CTA time,neurology consultation to consent for IVT,CTA-to-needle time(CNT),and door-to-needle time(DNT),the percentage of people who underwent CTA within 20 min,15 min,and 10 min and DNT within 60 min,45 min,and 30 min were collected and compared.Results:Following the implementation of the standardized IVT process management strategy for stroke,the DNT for group B1 and group B2 were 30(24,44)min and 31(24,41)min,respectively,both significantly lower than the 46(38,58)min in group A(P<0.001);the median DCT were both 13 min in group B1 and B2 lower than 17min in group A(P<0.001);the median CTA were 12 min in Group B1 and 9 min in Group B2 lower than 14 min in group A(P<0.001);similar results were observed during the neurology consultation to obtain consent for IVT and CNT.Compared with group A,the proportion of DCT20 min,15 min,and 10 min was higher in groups B1 and B2(P<0.05),and the same result was observed at DNT60 min,45 min,and 30 min(P<0.05).However,the additional incentive policy did not significantly differ between Group B2 and Group B1.Conclusions:Optimizing IVT therapy for ischemic stroke is a feasible approach to limit the DNT to 30 min in ischemic stroke,significantly reducing delays within the therapeutic window and increasing the number of patients meeting target time segments.Additionally,generating a timeline for the IVT therapy process by scanning positioning quick response codes was a significant breakthrough in achieving the informatization of IVT quality management for stroke.
