本论文旨在探讨德国哲学家伽达默尔的诠释学方法与康德的认识论之间的关系,特别关注主观性与客观性之间的平衡。伽达默尔的诠释学方法强调对历史性意识和理解的重视,而康德的认识论则关注主观性与客观性的关系。通过比较两者的观点,本...本论文旨在探讨德国哲学家伽达默尔的诠释学方法与康德的认识论之间的关系,特别关注主观性与客观性之间的平衡。伽达默尔的诠释学方法强调对历史性意识和理解的重视,而康德的认识论则关注主观性与客观性的关系。通过比较两者的观点,本文试图深入理解伽达默尔如何在诠释学方法中处理主观性和客观性之间的平衡,以及与康德认识论的异同点,并探讨它们在伦理维度上的意义。This paper aims to explore the relationship between the hermeneutic approach of German philosopher Gadamer and Kant’s epistemology, with a particular focus on the balance between subjectivity and objectivity. Gadamer’s hermeneutic approach emphasizes the importance of historical consciousness and understanding, while Kant’s epistemology focuses on the relationship between subjectivity and objectivity. By comparing the perspectives of both, this article attempts to gain a deeper understanding of how Gadamer balances subjectivity and objectivity in his hermeneutic approach, as well as the similarities and differences with Kant’s epistemology, and explores their ethical significance.展开更多
文摘本论文旨在探讨德国哲学家伽达默尔的诠释学方法与康德的认识论之间的关系,特别关注主观性与客观性之间的平衡。伽达默尔的诠释学方法强调对历史性意识和理解的重视,而康德的认识论则关注主观性与客观性的关系。通过比较两者的观点,本文试图深入理解伽达默尔如何在诠释学方法中处理主观性和客观性之间的平衡,以及与康德认识论的异同点,并探讨它们在伦理维度上的意义。This paper aims to explore the relationship between the hermeneutic approach of German philosopher Gadamer and Kant’s epistemology, with a particular focus on the balance between subjectivity and objectivity. Gadamer’s hermeneutic approach emphasizes the importance of historical consciousness and understanding, while Kant’s epistemology focuses on the relationship between subjectivity and objectivity. By comparing the perspectives of both, this article attempts to gain a deeper understanding of how Gadamer balances subjectivity and objectivity in his hermeneutic approach, as well as the similarities and differences with Kant’s epistemology, and explores their ethical significance.
