Objective： To evaluate the clinical value of fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction （FQ-PCR） in the diagnosis of primary syphilis. Methods： 68 swab specimens were collected from patients suspected of i...Objective： To evaluate the clinical value of fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction （FQ-PCR） in the diagnosis of primary syphilis. Methods： 68 swab specimens were collected from patients suspected of infecttion with primary syphilis attending two STD clinics （Guangzhou Institute of Dermatovenerology and the First People＇s Hospital of Guangzhou city）, from September 1998 to December 2000. Analysis： by FQ-PCR, darkfield microscopy （D-F） for Treponema pallidum （TP）, and serologic testing for syphilis （STS）. Results： Of 68 patients, 30 （44.12%） were positive for TP by QF-PCR assay, 19 （27.94%） were positive for TP by D-F, 33 （48.53%） were positive for TP-IgG antibody by RPR, and 42 （61.76%） were positive for TP-IgG antibody by TPHA. There are significant differences in detection between D-F and TPHA （P〈0.05）, but there is no difference with RPR （P〉0.1）. Conclusion： This data shows that QF-PCR is a convenient, reliable and rapid method for diagnosis of primary syphilis, and may be an effective clinical assay in the detection of TP.展开更多
文摘Objective： To evaluate the clinical value of fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction （FQ-PCR） in the diagnosis of primary syphilis. Methods： 68 swab specimens were collected from patients suspected of infecttion with primary syphilis attending two STD clinics （Guangzhou Institute of Dermatovenerology and the First People＇s Hospital of Guangzhou city）, from September 1998 to December 2000. Analysis： by FQ-PCR, darkfield microscopy （D-F） for Treponema pallidum （TP）, and serologic testing for syphilis （STS）. Results： Of 68 patients, 30 （44.12%） were positive for TP by QF-PCR assay, 19 （27.94%） were positive for TP by D-F, 33 （48.53%） were positive for TP-IgG antibody by RPR, and 42 （61.76%） were positive for TP-IgG antibody by TPHA. There are significant differences in detection between D-F and TPHA （P〈0.05）, but there is no difference with RPR （P〉0.1）. Conclusion： This data shows that QF-PCR is a convenient, reliable and rapid method for diagnosis of primary syphilis, and may be an effective clinical assay in the detection of TP.
