Husserl’s intentionanalysis in the objectsphere has been regarded as successful ever since. But some scholars think that this intentionanalysis is not authentic for the non-objective spheres, e.g., those of emotion a...Husserl’s intentionanalysis in the objectsphere has been regarded as successful ever since. But some scholars think that this intentionanalysis is not authentic for the non-objective spheres, e.g., those of emotion and unconsciousness. Others do not agree with them. This paper concentrates on this controversy, and attempts to answer the question by the revelation of the essential relations between proto-consciousness and unconsciousness, which has been seized by Husserl. The 1st section brings forward two concepts of the “proto-consciousness” in Husserl. The 2nd section discusses the position of one of the concepts of proto-consciousness, namely, the criticism of J. Derrida on Husserl’s “ metaphysics of presence”. The 3rd are extracted about which different concepts of the unconsciousness of Husserl’s mainconcept are emphasized. The 4th section as the forgotten, however still contributes background in the time-consciousness. The 5th section then deals with the relationship between proto-consciousness (proto-impression) and unconsciousness (background-consciousness), and with the degrees of the consciousness and unconsciousness. In the 6th section, the foundingrelation between the phenomenology of time-consciousness and phenomenology of genesis, as well as the according methods is taken into account, and it finally results at a general consideration and valuation on the method of the intentionanalysis and the principle of immediate intuition in Husserl’s phenomenology.展开更多
With eight typical examples, this paper discusses the erroneous translation in the Chinese version of The Da Vinci code, points out the possible reasons and suggests the importance of faithfulness and that of sense of...With eight typical examples, this paper discusses the erroneous translation in the Chinese version of The Da Vinci code, points out the possible reasons and suggests the importance of faithfulness and that of sense of responsibility.展开更多
文摘Husserl’s intentionanalysis in the objectsphere has been regarded as successful ever since. But some scholars think that this intentionanalysis is not authentic for the non-objective spheres, e.g., those of emotion and unconsciousness. Others do not agree with them. This paper concentrates on this controversy, and attempts to answer the question by the revelation of the essential relations between proto-consciousness and unconsciousness, which has been seized by Husserl. The 1st section brings forward two concepts of the “proto-consciousness” in Husserl. The 2nd section discusses the position of one of the concepts of proto-consciousness, namely, the criticism of J. Derrida on Husserl’s “ metaphysics of presence”. The 3rd are extracted about which different concepts of the unconsciousness of Husserl’s mainconcept are emphasized. The 4th section as the forgotten, however still contributes background in the time-consciousness. The 5th section then deals with the relationship between proto-consciousness (proto-impression) and unconsciousness (background-consciousness), and with the degrees of the consciousness and unconsciousness. In the 6th section, the foundingrelation between the phenomenology of time-consciousness and phenomenology of genesis, as well as the according methods is taken into account, and it finally results at a general consideration and valuation on the method of the intentionanalysis and the principle of immediate intuition in Husserl’s phenomenology.
文摘With eight typical examples, this paper discusses the erroneous translation in the Chinese version of The Da Vinci code, points out the possible reasons and suggests the importance of faithfulness and that of sense of responsibility.
