史陵及其书事考述

经考证得知,史陵并非生于隋朝,应为北朝抑或南朝入隋之人,主要活动于隋朝及初唐时期,以此标准论当归之于隋朝。史陵所书碑刻《隋禹庙残碑》为正书,大业二年(六〇六)五月立,此碑笔法精妙,然碑文内容未识。史陵善行书和楷书,行书多属王献之一脉的欹侧跌宕书风。唐太宗、李元昌、虞世南和褚遂良等曾师法史陵,取法亦多为王献之一路书风,唐太宗、虞世南、褚遂良师法史陵的时间为唐高祖武德年间(六一八—、六二六),即李世民当秦王时,李元昌学习史陵书法应为其童年时期,且在武德八年(六二六)以后。

褚遂良书法南北归属问题兼谈阮元划分的南北书派

阮元《南北书派论》划褚遂良书法为“北派”,始有关于褚遂良书法归属南北问题。对于褚遂良书法归属问题首先要解决的是褚遂良书法师承问题,并且以作品来比照阮元划分的依据。阮元所论是以出土材料来证褚遂良书法风格的,其后康有为更是如此。所以清代人关于“碑学”划分所依据的正是那些出土的文字遗迹,如此来规定褚遂良书法的归属是片面的。

Women and the Transnational Dynamics of Science Education in Early Twentieth Century China:A Quiet Revolution

This article explores both the personal and transnational dimensions of domestic science education and study abroad for the pioneering generation of Chinese women in science.By focusing on women’s unique calculus of risk and reward,the article not only distinguishes Chinese women’s experiences from those of their male counterparts but also delineates the special contours of the Chinese case within the global advancement of women in science.The article begins by outlining some of the features and dynamics of early Chinese girls’schools that affected students’interest in and preparation for further scientific study.Then it traces the emerging college-level opportunities that made it possible for women who were studying science in China to contemplate advanced work overseas.Turning to study abroad,the article highlights the radicalness of the decision to study abroad by examining the impact of both family background and national circumstances on Chinese women’s strategies of mobility.The article argues that if we are to take women’s experiences seriously,we cannot just look at scientific pursuits in terms of achievements in the development of Chinese science,we also need to consider the ways that·scientific ambitions forced individuals—both male and female—to navigate and reimagine multiple social norms and expectations.

南北书风融合述略——从五世纪中期的南风北渐说起

学术界大都将公元五四四年王褒入关作为南朝书风北传的标志性事件。《周书·赵文深传》记载,王褒入关之后"贵族等翕然并学褒书",就连当时楷隶代表书家赵文深也改学王褒书法,但是没有学成反而被讥笑为邯郸学步。