期刊文献+
共找到9篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
司法定量模式引入的困境与解决 被引量:1
1
作者 范淼 《社会科学辑刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期72-76,共5页
立法定量与司法定量这两种不同的犯罪定量模式关系到一国刑事法律的各个方面。基于刑法的公平正义、保障人权与社会防卫的角度,司法定量是犯罪定量模式选择的应然目标。但我国一直以立法定量模式为行为的入罪标准,要想将其转变为司法定... 立法定量与司法定量这两种不同的犯罪定量模式关系到一国刑事法律的各个方面。基于刑法的公平正义、保障人权与社会防卫的角度,司法定量是犯罪定量模式选择的应然目标。但我国一直以立法定量模式为行为的入罪标准,要想将其转变为司法定量模式,需要突破理论和实践上的改革困境。这种改革困境实际上根源于所移植的外来制度与本土资源的冲突,我们应通过对刑法现有立法和司法环境的调整,为司法定量模式的引入构建可衔接的刑法环境。 展开更多
关键词 立法定量模式 司法定量模式 法律移植 本土化策略
下载PDF
论定量因素在我国犯罪构成中的定位——基于我国犯罪构成理论完善的视角 被引量:1
2
作者 白利勇 《湖南公安高等专科学校学报》 2010年第6期25-29,共5页
定量因素并非我国刑法首创,定量因素在现代法治国家都是存在的,只是具体实施方式不同而已。我国刑法选择了"立法定性又定量"的犯罪定量模式,定量因素在立法上成为出罪与入罪的重要标准,而定量因素却没有在犯罪构成中得到体现... 定量因素并非我国刑法首创,定量因素在现代法治国家都是存在的,只是具体实施方式不同而已。我国刑法选择了"立法定性又定量"的犯罪定量模式,定量因素在立法上成为出罪与入罪的重要标准,而定量因素却没有在犯罪构成中得到体现,定量因素必须纳入到犯罪构成之中。同时,客观的超过要素概念的提出给定量因素引入犯罪构成中开辟了道路。"立法定性又定量"的定量模式之下我国仍然存在着"司法定量"。 展开更多
关键词 定量因素 犯罪构成 客观的超过要素 司法定量
下载PDF
零容忍政策的内涵解读与实现路径 被引量:4
3
作者 卢建平 司冰岩 《北京联合大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2019年第2期72-83,共12页
零容忍一词已近滥觞,但对其内涵的理解不尽一致。不应仅从字面意义或数学意义上简单解读零容忍的内涵,社会学意义的解读更为可取。零容忍应分为立法上的零容忍和司法上的零容忍,立法零容忍是一种绝对的"无"的零容忍,司法零容... 零容忍一词已近滥觞,但对其内涵的理解不尽一致。不应仅从字面意义或数学意义上简单解读零容忍的内涵,社会学意义的解读更为可取。零容忍应分为立法上的零容忍和司法上的零容忍,立法零容忍是一种绝对的"无"的零容忍,司法零容忍则是一种有限度的、且是最低限度的容忍,此种最低限度容忍的具体程度面对不同语境、时空、对象时均有差异。我国施行零容忍政策有破窗理论和积极刑法立法观的理论支持,且其思想内涵在我国颇有渊源。对比域外"立法定性"的刑事立法模式,我国"定性+定量"的立法模式不利于实施零容忍政策。零容忍政策的实现应采取立法定性和"严而不厉"的立法模式,在司法上贯彻最低限度的容忍,力图破除法官滥用自由裁量权、过度刑法化和国家刑罚权的恣意扩张的担忧。 展开更多
关键词 零容忍 破窗理论 积极的刑法立法观 立法定性 司法定量
下载PDF
The Effects of Job Security, Features, Personal Values, and Recognition on Organizational Involvement
4
作者 Yacoub Petro Arun Bajracharya 《Chinese Business Review》 2012年第8期740-747,共8页
As extrinsic rewards become very limited under organizational retrenchments, organizations should rely heavily on other types of rewards, such as intrinsic rewards, to improve the performance of those employees who ha... As extrinsic rewards become very limited under organizational retrenchments, organizations should rely heavily on other types of rewards, such as intrinsic rewards, to improve the performance of those employees who have been overwhelmed with a perception of job insecurity. This paper examines the impact of such perception, along with many other positive influencers such as enhancement in job features, recognition, and the personal values of those employees on the organizational involvement. The data analyzed were based on a sample of 34 employee respondents from a project based engineering and service company (identified as ABC Company in this paper) operating in the Middle East. The adopted research approach is basically a quantitative approach. The correlation and regression analysis tools have been used to explore this relationship. The results of this study suggest a generally unnoticed and disregarded resource that has the prime effect on improving and enhancing the organizational involvement, which is the recognition those employees receive from the management. This research suggests that recognition, as the top influencer, has a strong impact on organizational involvement/psychological attachment for the employees. The other factors that have proved to have the second degree influence on organizational involvement are enhancement in job features, increase in the job security level, and personal values. 展开更多
关键词 organizational involvement job features job security VALUES RECOGNITION
下载PDF
犯罪定量模式检讨 被引量:34
5
作者 沈海平 《法学家》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期98-115,179,共18页
如所周知,中外刑法由于法律文化传统、法律演进路径的不同而形成不同的犯罪定量模式,即西方国家一般实行"司法定量"模式而中国则实行"立法定量"模式。"立法定量"模式是实质主义刑法观的产物,虽然具有实... 如所周知,中外刑法由于法律文化传统、法律演进路径的不同而形成不同的犯罪定量模式,即西方国家一般实行"司法定量"模式而中国则实行"立法定量"模式。"立法定量"模式是实质主义刑法观的产物,虽然具有实质合理性,符合刑法谦抑原则,但是欠缺形式合理性,从而带来一系列问题。因此,放弃立法定量,实行司法定量,并构建轻罪处理机制,是理性选择。 展开更多
关键词 但书规定 立法定量 司法定量 轻罪处理机制
原文传递
我国刑法中的犯罪定量及其合理化规制与运用 被引量:7
6
作者 彭文华 《法学论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第2期117-128,共12页
我国刑法对犯罪定量采取由总到分的立法定量模式,刑法总则第13条但书对犯罪定量作了一般性规定,分则对许多个罪定量亦作出具体规定。但书定量规定具有积极的规范价值和实践意义。分则中的定量规定本土特色鲜明,但也存在缺陷与不足。我... 我国刑法对犯罪定量采取由总到分的立法定量模式,刑法总则第13条但书对犯罪定量作了一般性规定,分则对许多个罪定量亦作出具体规定。但书定量规定具有积极的规范价值和实践意义。分则中的定量规定本土特色鲜明,但也存在缺陷与不足。我国司法解释中的犯罪定量规定具有独特的功能和作用,同时也存在一些问题。司法实践对定量规定不恰当的理解和运用包括:对总则定量规定与分则个别定量之间的关系存在不恰当理解;没有充分运用犯罪定量的价值判断;怠于行使司法自由裁量权。我国犯罪定量的合理化规制与运用主要路径包括:设置专门犯罪定量机构或者部门;规范犯罪定量要求;遵循犯罪定量的一般原则;正确理解与适用相关定量规定;强化犯罪定量的程序制约。 展开更多
关键词 犯罪定量 立法定量规定 司法解释定量规定 定量并合主义 程序规制
原文传递
不同犯罪规定模式中的谦抑性问题研究 被引量:2
7
作者 孔祥参 《党政干部学刊》 2020年第5期18-22,共5页
谦抑性是现代刑法的基本理念,谦抑性的贯彻落实和刑法关于犯罪的规定模式密切相关。从形式上看,采用立法定性+司法定量的规定模式在立法上未体现出谦抑性的要求,而采用立法定性+定量的规定模式在立法上直接嵌入了刑法谦抑的基本理念。... 谦抑性是现代刑法的基本理念,谦抑性的贯彻落实和刑法关于犯罪的规定模式密切相关。从形式上看,采用立法定性+司法定量的规定模式在立法上未体现出谦抑性的要求,而采用立法定性+定量的规定模式在立法上直接嵌入了刑法谦抑的基本理念。但是二者只是涉及到轻微违法行为的处理方式问题,并不能代表刑法是否谦抑。采用立法定性+定量的刑法规定模式,要明确构成要件要素和客观处罚条件,在司法中对定量要素进一步确认,刑法谦抑性的贯彻需要立法和司法的共同作用。 展开更多
关键词 谦抑性 犯罪规定模式 立法定性+司法定量 立法定性+定量
原文传递
Sentencing Recommendations,Anchoring Effect and Fairness in Criminal Justice——An Empirical Study Based on a Sample of 520 Sentences in K City 被引量:5
8
作者 林喜芬 马勇 黄德远 《Social Sciences in China》 2018年第3期149-170,共22页
The anchoring effect is a powerful and widespread cognitive phenomenon in the decision-making field.Our quantitative analysis of a sample of 520 sentences indicates that the sentencing recommendation of the public pro... The anchoring effect is a powerful and widespread cognitive phenomenon in the decision-making field.Our quantitative analysis of a sample of 520 sentences indicates that the sentencing recommendation of the public procuratorate has a marked influence upon the court's sentencing judgment.That is,whether we are investigating the freedom penalty,the fine penalty or the term of probation imposed by the judge,we find that the anchoring effect does exist.In addition,a change in the court conviction or in the trial sentencing circumstances and the availability of a defense lawyer may weaken the anchoring effect of the procuratorate's sentencing recommendations.As a form of cognitive bias,the presence of the anchoring effect in the area of sentencing further highlights the necessity of applying analyses based on legal realism to the field of criminal justice in China;and at the institutional level,it demands that judges adopt corresponding arrangements to ensure the impartial exercise of discretion. 展开更多
关键词 sentencing recommendations anchoring effect DISCRETION judicial fairness
原文传递
The Application of Pareto's 80/20 Rule to Law: A Quantitative Analysis Based upon Trials Involving a Plea of Guilty
9
作者 Li Bensen 《Social Sciences in China》 2013年第4期100-117,共18页
In the field of law, particularly in the area of legal proceedings and other types of dispute settlement, judicial organs can achieve the best allocation of judicial resources by summary handling of the simple cases, ... In the field of law, particularly in the area of legal proceedings and other types of dispute settlement, judicial organs can achieve the best allocation of judicial resources by summary handling of the simple cases, which are in the majority, and optimizing the complex ones, which are in the minority. Summary handling of the simple majority means reducing the marginal cost of judicial activities in accord with the principle of simplifying procedures but not rights while improving judicial effectiveness and promoting judicial justice in a way predicated on protecting the fundamental rights of legal actors. According to quantitative analysis based on trials in which the defendant entered a plea of guilty, there is still plenty of room to optimize the resource allocation mechanism in the field of criminal justice. Implementing the summary procedure confirmed in the 2012 Criminal Procedure Law requires that the judicial organs guarantee defendants who have pleaded guilty the right to a lawyer. It also requires the improvement of judicial efficiency at the stages of investigation, bringing a case, and trial. Only by doing so can we scientifically allocate criminal justice resources overall and effectively promote judicial justice. 展开更多
关键词 Pareto's 80/20 rule cases in which the defendant pleads guilty summary procedure allocation of judicial resources quantitative analysis
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部