Taking multinational firms operating in China as objects of research,this paper has discovered through empirical study that economic institutional distance and cultural institutional distance have negative effects on ...Taking multinational firms operating in China as objects of research,this paper has discovered through empirical study that economic institutional distance and cultural institutional distance have negative effects on the corporate social responsibility(CSR) performance of multinational firms in a host country;when the legal system of home country is far better than that of host country,legal institutional distance has a positive effect on the CSR performance of multinational firms in the host country;entry mode has negative adjustment effect on the relationship of legal institutional distance and cultural institutional distance with the CSR performance of multinational firms in a host country;business experience of multinational firms in a host country has a negative adjustment effect on the relationship between legal institutional distance and their CSR performance in the host country.展开更多
Following reform and opening up, China witnessed a rapid increase in legal cases, but the rate of increase has undergone a marked decline since 1997. The reasons this has occurred in a period of social transformation ...Following reform and opening up, China witnessed a rapid increase in legal cases, but the rate of increase has undergone a marked decline since 1997. The reasons this has occurred in a period of social transformation are threefold： a non-litigious dispute-settling mechanism, judicial policy and the credibility of the courts. A data analysis of the average annual rate of growth, the correlation coefficient and the respective proportions of solutions under the litigious and the non-litigious dispute-settling mechanisms indicates that the slowing of the rate of growth of litigation has been accompanied by a decrease in the role of the people＇s mediation system and the economic arbitration system. However, it is the strengthening of administrative dispute-settling mechanisms, a judicial policy of not accepting cases, the reform of litigation fees and a series of institutional cbnstructs aimed at judicial corruption that has curbed the rapid increase of legal cases.展开更多
基金sponsored by the Youth Program of National Social Sciences Foundation Research on the Evaluation and Promotion of Corporate Social Responsibilities in China(Approval No.12CGL039)
文摘Taking multinational firms operating in China as objects of research,this paper has discovered through empirical study that economic institutional distance and cultural institutional distance have negative effects on the corporate social responsibility(CSR) performance of multinational firms in a host country;when the legal system of home country is far better than that of host country,legal institutional distance has a positive effect on the CSR performance of multinational firms in the host country;entry mode has negative adjustment effect on the relationship of legal institutional distance and cultural institutional distance with the CSR performance of multinational firms in a host country;business experience of multinational firms in a host country has a negative adjustment effect on the relationship between legal institutional distance and their CSR performance in the host country.
文摘Following reform and opening up, China witnessed a rapid increase in legal cases, but the rate of increase has undergone a marked decline since 1997. The reasons this has occurred in a period of social transformation are threefold： a non-litigious dispute-settling mechanism, judicial policy and the credibility of the courts. A data analysis of the average annual rate of growth, the correlation coefficient and the respective proportions of solutions under the litigious and the non-litigious dispute-settling mechanisms indicates that the slowing of the rate of growth of litigation has been accompanied by a decrease in the role of the people＇s mediation system and the economic arbitration system. However, it is the strengthening of administrative dispute-settling mechanisms, a judicial policy of not accepting cases, the reform of litigation fees and a series of institutional cbnstructs aimed at judicial corruption that has curbed the rapid increase of legal cases.
