Objective To investigate the performance of dual-source computed tomography （DSCT） using high-pitch spiral fliPS） mode for coronary stents patency. Methods We conducted a prospective study on 120 patients with 260 ...Objective To investigate the performance of dual-source computed tomography （DSCT） using high-pitch spiral fliPS） mode for coronary stents patency. Methods We conducted a prospective study on 120 patients with 260 previous stents implanted due to recurred suspicious symptoms of angina scheduled for invasive coronary angiography （ICA）, while DSCT were conducted using HPS mode. Results There was no significant impact of age, body mass index or heat rate （HR） on image quality （P 〉 0.05）, while HR variability had a slight impact on that （P 〈 0.05）. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value （PPV）, negative predictive value （NPV） of DSCT in detection of in-stent restenosis （ISR） based per-patient were 92.3%, 96.7%, 88.9%, and 97.8%, respectively. And those based per-stent were 87%, 96.8%, 83.3%, and 97.7% with un-assessment stents, 97.4%, 99.5%, 97.4%, and 99.5% without un-assessment stents. There was significant differ- ence on sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV between diameter 〉 3.0 mm group （93.3%, 97.9%, 87.5%, and 98.9%） and diameter 〈 3.0 mm group （80%, 93.3%, 80.0%, and 93.3%） （P 〈 0.05）, and that between stent number 〉 3 group （82.3%, 77.8%, 66.7%, and 60%） with 〈 3 group （97.3%, 80%, 96.5%, and 75%）. The effective dose of DSCT （1.4 ± 0.5 mSv） is significantly less than that by invasive coronary angiography [4.0 ± 0.8 mSv （P 〈 0.01）]. Conclusion DSCT using HPS mode provides good diagnostic performance on stent patency with lower effective dose in patients with HR 〈 65 beats/rain.展开更多
文摘Objective To investigate the performance of dual-source computed tomography （DSCT） using high-pitch spiral fliPS） mode for coronary stents patency. Methods We conducted a prospective study on 120 patients with 260 previous stents implanted due to recurred suspicious symptoms of angina scheduled for invasive coronary angiography （ICA）, while DSCT were conducted using HPS mode. Results There was no significant impact of age, body mass index or heat rate （HR） on image quality （P 〉 0.05）, while HR variability had a slight impact on that （P 〈 0.05）. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value （PPV）, negative predictive value （NPV） of DSCT in detection of in-stent restenosis （ISR） based per-patient were 92.3%, 96.7%, 88.9%, and 97.8%, respectively. And those based per-stent were 87%, 96.8%, 83.3%, and 97.7% with un-assessment stents, 97.4%, 99.5%, 97.4%, and 99.5% without un-assessment stents. There was significant differ- ence on sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV between diameter 〉 3.0 mm group （93.3%, 97.9%, 87.5%, and 98.9%） and diameter 〈 3.0 mm group （80%, 93.3%, 80.0%, and 93.3%） （P 〈 0.05）, and that between stent number 〉 3 group （82.3%, 77.8%, 66.7%, and 60%） with 〈 3 group （97.3%, 80%, 96.5%, and 75%）. The effective dose of DSCT （1.4 ± 0.5 mSv） is significantly less than that by invasive coronary angiography [4.0 ± 0.8 mSv （P 〈 0.01）]. Conclusion DSCT using HPS mode provides good diagnostic performance on stent patency with lower effective dose in patients with HR 〈 65 beats/rain.
