期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
土工加筋处理技术在高速路基拓宽改造中的应用
1
作者 刘晓 《中文科技期刊数据库(文摘版)工程技术》 2019年第5期388-389,共2页
土工加筋处理技术是一种通过增加地基的柔韧性以及整体性,来帮助建筑获得抗震效果的一种处理技术,技术在实施的过程中,是将数层具有强大抗震抗拉性能的筋状有机带,加入到需要换填的地基土中来进行改善。该处理技术常被应用于高速公路基... 土工加筋处理技术是一种通过增加地基的柔韧性以及整体性,来帮助建筑获得抗震效果的一种处理技术,技术在实施的过程中,是将数层具有强大抗震抗拉性能的筋状有机带,加入到需要换填的地基土中来进行改善。该处理技术常被应用于高速公路基土的处理中。本文将结合某地的实际公路拓宽改造项目进行案例分析,并对高速路基拓宽改造中路基不均匀沉降原因进行研究探讨,通过案例的分析来总结出土工加筋处理技术在实际应用中如何进行质量把控的要点,以此来对高速公路的拓宽改造施工质量进行全面提升。 展开更多
关键词 土工加筋处理技术 地基土 拓宽改造 实际应用
下载PDF
Field study on performance of new technique of geosynthetic-reinforced and pile-supported embankment at bridge approach 被引量:2
2
作者 ZHANG Jun ZHENG JunJie +1 位作者 ZHAO DuiJia CHEN ShouGen 《Science China(Technological Sciences)》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2016年第1期162-174,共13页
Vehicle bumps at a bridge approach caused by the differential settlement between a bridge and an adjacent backfill embankment are one of the most difficult problems in geotechnical engineering. Large vehicle bumps mak... Vehicle bumps at a bridge approach caused by the differential settlement between a bridge and an adjacent backfill embankment are one of the most difficult problems in geotechnical engineering. Large vehicle bumps make drivers uncomfortable and cause large impact loads on vehicles and the bridge abutment. A new ground-improvement technique called fixed-geosynthetic-reinforced and pile-supported embankment(FGT embankment) was developed and used to alleviate vehicle bumps at a trial bridge-approach site located in central China. To distribute the differential settlement between the bridge and adjacent backfill embankment over a long transition zone, the following three techniques were used at the trial bridge-approach site:(a) the FGT embankment,(b) conventional geosynthetic-reinforced and pile-supported embankment(CT embankment), and(c) geosynthetic-reinforced embankment without piles(GR embankment). The performance of all three techniques in the field trial was investigated by field measurements involving earth pressure cells, geosynthetic deformation sensors, and settlement gauges. The FGT and CT embankments exhibited better performance than the GR embankment. Compared with the CT embankment, the FGT embankment was more effective at ground improvement. At an elevation of 4.0 m from the base of the embankment, the pressures below the geosynthetic were smaller than those above the geosynthetic at the closest measurement point. The difference between the pressures between above and below the geosynthetic tended to increase with the embankment height. 展开更多
关键词 pile supported embankment geosynthetic field test bridge approach ground improvement
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部