期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
深圳“12.20”山体滑坡灾害成因及安全防范分析 被引量:19
1
作者 唐尧 《国土资源情报》 2016年第1期39-43,共5页
深圳"12.20"山体滑坡是共造成58人遇难、77人失踪、33栋建筑物被埋或受损的重特大人员伤亡及财产损失的灾害。文章通过分析深圳市域内重要的地质灾害隐患,结合灾前及灾后卫星影像与航空照片等资料,分析了光明新区恒泰裕山体... 深圳"12.20"山体滑坡是共造成58人遇难、77人失踪、33栋建筑物被埋或受损的重特大人员伤亡及财产损失的灾害。文章通过分析深圳市域内重要的地质灾害隐患,结合灾前及灾后卫星影像与航空照片等资料,分析了光明新区恒泰裕山体滑坡的滑坡体物源组成、物源区演化及滑坡形成过程、灾情影响等,并结合深圳历史滑坡、滑坡和崩塌隐患点及2015年深圳市地质灾害重点防范区数据等资料,参阅本次滑坡灾情及成因情况,初步划定了深圳市域内的重大地质灾害防范区,总结了深圳地质灾害安全避险建议,这对深圳防灾避灾具有重要意义。 展开更多
关键词 深圳 恒泰裕 滑坡 地灾成因 安全防范
下载PDF
Characteristics,Causes and Mitigation of Catastrophic Debris Flow Hazard on 21 July 2011 at the Longda Watershed of Songpan County,China 被引量:5
2
作者 GE Yong-gang CUI Peng +2 位作者 GUO Xiao-jun SONG Guo-hu LIU Wei-ming 《Journal of Mountain Science》 SCIE CSCD 2013年第2期261-272,共12页
Debris flow is a common natural hazard in the mountain areas of Western China due to favorable natural conditions, and also exacerbated by mountainous exploitation activities. This paper concentrated on the characteri... Debris flow is a common natural hazard in the mountain areas of Western China due to favorable natural conditions, and also exacerbated by mountainous exploitation activities. This paper concentrated on the characteristics, causes and mitigation of a catastrophic mine debris flow hazard at Longda Watershed in Songpan County, Sichuan Province, on 21 July 2011. This debris flow deposited in the front of the No.1 dam, silted the drainage channel for flood and then rushed into tailing sediment reservoir in the main channel and made the No.2 dam breached. The outburst debris flow blocked Fu River, formed dammed lake and generated outburst flood, which delivered heavy metals into the lower reaches of Fu River, polluted the drink water source of the population of over 1 million. The debris flow was characterized with a density of 1.87~2.15 t/m3 and a clay content of less than 1.63%. The peak velocity and flux at Longda Gully was over l0.0~10.9 m/s and 429.o~446.o m3/s, respectively, and the flux was about 700 m3/s in main channel, equaling to the flux of the probability of 1%. About 33o,ooorn3 solid materials was transported by debris flow and deposited in the drainage tunnel (120,000~130,000 m3), the front of No.1 dam (100,000 m3) and the mouth of the watershed (l00,000~110,000 m3), respectively. When the peak flux and magnitude of debris flow was more than 462 m3/s and 7,423 m3, respectively, it would block Fu River and produce a hazard chain which was composed of debris flow, dammed lake and outburst flood. Furthermore, the 21 July large-scale debris flow was triggered by rainstorm with an intensity of 21.2 mm/0.5 h and the solid materials of debris flow were provided by landslides, slope deposits, mining wastes and tailing sediments. The property losses were mainly originated from the silting of the drainage tunnel for flash flood but not for debris flow and the irrational location of tailing sediment reservoir. Therefore, the mitigation measures for mine debris flows were presented: (1) The disastrous debris flow watershed should be identified in planning period and prohibited from being taken as the site of mining factories; (2) The mining facilities are constructed at the safe areas or watersheds; (3) Scoria plots, concentrator factory and tailing sediment reservoir are constructed in safe areas where the protection measures be easily made against debris flows; (4) The appropriate system and plan of debris flow mitigation including monitoring, remote monitoring and early-warning and emergency plan is established; (5) The stability of waste dump and tailing sediment reservoir are monitored continuously to prevent mining debris flows. 展开更多
关键词 Debris Flow CHARACTERISTICS CAUSES MITIGATION Longda Watershed
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部