3.本工程基底反力和基础沉降的电算结果根据上述的基本方程组及其计算步骤,结合本工程把基底划分50个网格。每个网格的尺寸2.2×4.3m。沿 x 方向划分10段,沿 y 方向分为5个网格。x 方向基础总长度43m,y 方向基础总宽度11m。y 轴到...3.本工程基底反力和基础沉降的电算结果根据上述的基本方程组及其计算步骤,结合本工程把基底划分50个网格。每个网格的尺寸2.2×4.3m。沿 x 方向划分10段,沿 y 方向分为5个网格。x 方向基础总长度43m,y 方向基础总宽度11m。y 轴到基础左边缘的距离为21.5m,x 轴到基础上边缘的距离为5.5m,如图4所示。作用在基础上的总荷载为3339×10~4N,荷载对 y 轴的总弯距为-634.4×10~4N·m,荷载对 x 轴的弯距不考虑。基底土的自重应力为2.19×10~4N/m^2。展开更多
AIM: Our aims were to determine the normal limits of subepithelial basement membrane (SEBM) thickness in order to more accurately diagnose collagenous colitis in the population from southern Turkey and to investigate ...AIM: Our aims were to determine the normal limits of subepithelial basement membrane (SEBM) thickness in order to more accurately diagnose collagenous colitis in the population from southern Turkey and to investigate into links between SEBM thickness and age, and sex. METHODS: The study included 100 patients (mean age 50.0±13.3 years; male, 34; female, 66) with miscellaneous gastrointestinal symptoms, and normal colonic mucosal appearance in colonoscopic evaluation. Biopsies were taken from five different regions of the colon. SEBM was measured with a calibrated eyepiece on specimens prepared with specific stains for collagen. Intensity of inflammatory cells was graded semiquantitatively. Differences in SEBM thickness among the different colon regions, and relationships between SEBM thickness and age, sex, and density of inflammatory cells were statistically evaluated. RESULTS: The cecum and rectum showed the largest amounts of infiltrate. None of the specimens showed histologic findings of collagenous colitis. The SEBM thicknesses measured for each case ranged from 3-20 μm. The biggest thickness was observed in rectal mucosa (median value: 10 μm). Cecum and ascending colon showed similar SEBM thickness (median value: 5 μm). SEBM thickness was not correlated with patient age or sex, but was positively correlated with the intensity of inflammatory cells in each colon segment. CONCLUSION: In this patient group from southern Turkey, SEBM was thickest in the rectum. Our results indicate that, in this population, SEBM thickness is not correlated with age or sex, but is positively correlated with severity of inflammation. The findings also support the concept that measuring SEBM thickness at one segment in the colon is inadequate and may be misleading.展开更多
文摘3.本工程基底反力和基础沉降的电算结果根据上述的基本方程组及其计算步骤,结合本工程把基底划分50个网格。每个网格的尺寸2.2×4.3m。沿 x 方向划分10段,沿 y 方向分为5个网格。x 方向基础总长度43m,y 方向基础总宽度11m。y 轴到基础左边缘的距离为21.5m,x 轴到基础上边缘的距离为5.5m,如图4所示。作用在基础上的总荷载为3339×10~4N,荷载对 y 轴的总弯距为-634.4×10~4N·m,荷载对 x 轴的弯距不考虑。基底土的自重应力为2.19×10~4N/m^2。
文摘AIM: Our aims were to determine the normal limits of subepithelial basement membrane (SEBM) thickness in order to more accurately diagnose collagenous colitis in the population from southern Turkey and to investigate into links between SEBM thickness and age, and sex. METHODS: The study included 100 patients (mean age 50.0±13.3 years; male, 34; female, 66) with miscellaneous gastrointestinal symptoms, and normal colonic mucosal appearance in colonoscopic evaluation. Biopsies were taken from five different regions of the colon. SEBM was measured with a calibrated eyepiece on specimens prepared with specific stains for collagen. Intensity of inflammatory cells was graded semiquantitatively. Differences in SEBM thickness among the different colon regions, and relationships between SEBM thickness and age, sex, and density of inflammatory cells were statistically evaluated. RESULTS: The cecum and rectum showed the largest amounts of infiltrate. None of the specimens showed histologic findings of collagenous colitis. The SEBM thicknesses measured for each case ranged from 3-20 μm. The biggest thickness was observed in rectal mucosa (median value: 10 μm). Cecum and ascending colon showed similar SEBM thickness (median value: 5 μm). SEBM thickness was not correlated with patient age or sex, but was positively correlated with the intensity of inflammatory cells in each colon segment. CONCLUSION: In this patient group from southern Turkey, SEBM was thickest in the rectum. Our results indicate that, in this population, SEBM thickness is not correlated with age or sex, but is positively correlated with severity of inflammation. The findings also support the concept that measuring SEBM thickness at one segment in the colon is inadequate and may be misleading.
