Since extrahepatic bile duct cancer is difficult to diagnose and to cure, a safe and radical surgical strategy is needed. In this review, the modes of infiltration and spread of extrahepatic bile duct cancer and surgi...Since extrahepatic bile duct cancer is difficult to diagnose and to cure, a safe and radical surgical strategy is needed. In this review, the modes of infiltration and spread of extrahepatic bile duct cancer and surgical strategy are discussed. Extended hemihepatectomy, with or without pancreatoduodenectomy （PD）, plus extrahepatic bile duct resection and regional lyrnphadenectomy has recently been recognized as the standard curative treatment for hilar bile duct cancer. On the other hand, PD is the choice of treatment for middle and distal bile duct cancer. Major hepatectomy concomitant with PD （hepatopancreatoduodenectomy） has been applied to selected patients with widespread tumors. Preoperative biliary drainage （BD） followed by portal vein embolization （PVE） enables major hepatectomy in patients with hilar bile duct cancer without mortality. BD should be performed considering the surgical procedure, especially, in patients with separated intrahepatic bile ducts caused by hilar bile duct cancer. Right or left trisectoriectomy are indicated according to the tumor spread and biliary anatomy. As a result, extended radical resection offers a chance for cure of hilar bile duct cancer with improved resectability, curability, and a 5-year survival rate of 40%. A 5-year survival rate has ranged from 24% to 39% after PD for middle and distal bile duct cancer.展开更多
AIM: To determine if surgical biliary bypass would provide improved quality of residual life and safe palliation in elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic head cancer. METHODS: Nineteen patients, 65 years of ag...AIM: To determine if surgical biliary bypass would provide improved quality of residual life and safe palliation in elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic head cancer. METHODS: Nineteen patients, 65 years of age or older, were managed with surgical biliary bypass (Group A). These patients were compared with 19 patients under 65 years of age who were managed with surgical biliary bypass (Group B). In addition, the results for group A were compared with those obtained from 17 patients, 65 years of age or older (Group C), who received percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage to evaluate the quality of residual life. RESULTS: Five patients (26.0%) in Group A had complications, including one intraabdominal abscess, one pulmonary atelectasis, and three wound infections. One death (5.3%) occurred on postoperative day 3. With respect to morbidity, mortality, and postoperative hospitalization, no statistically significant difference was noted between Groups A and B. The number of readmissions and the rate of recurrent jaundice were lower in Group A than in Group C, to a statistically significant degree (P = 0.019, P = 0.029, respectively). The median hospital-free survival period and themedian overall survival were also signifi cantly longer in Group A (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Surgical palliation does not increase the morbidity or mortality rates, but it does increase the survival rate and improve the quality of life in elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic head cancer.展开更多
AIM： To evaluate survival rate and clinical outcome of cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS： The medical records of 34 patients with cholangiocarcinoma, seen at a single hospital between the years 1999-2006, were retrospecti...AIM： To evaluate survival rate and clinical outcome of cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS： The medical records of 34 patients with cholangiocarcinoma, seen at a single hospital between the years 1999-2006, were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS： Thirty-four patients with a median age of 75 years were included. Seventeen （50%） had painless jaundice at presentation. Sixteen （47.1%） were perihilar, 15 （44.1%） extrahepatic and three （8.8%） intrahepatic. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography （ERCP） and/or magnetic resonance cholangiography （MRCP） were used for the diagnosis. Pathologic confirmation was obtained in seven and positive cytological examination in three. Thirteen patients had co-morbidities （38.2%）. Four cases were managed with complete surgical resection. All the rest of the cases （30） were characterized as non-resectable due to advanced stage of the disease. Palliative biliary drainage was performed in 26/30 （86.6%）. The mean follow-up was 32 mo （95% CI, 20-43 too）. Overall median survival was 8.7 mo （95% CI, 2-16 mo）. The probability of 1-year, 2-year and 3-year survival was 46%, 20% and 7%, respectively. The survival was slightly longer in patients who underwent resection compared to those who did not, but this difference failed to reach statistical significance. Patients who underwent biliary drainage had an advantage in survival compared to those who did not （probability of survival 53% vs 0% at 1 year, respectively, P = 0.038）. CONCLUSION： Patients with cholangiocarcinoma were usually elderly with co-morbidities and/oradvanced disease at presentation. Even though a slight amelioration in survival with palliative biliary drainage was observed, patients had dismal outcome without resection of the tumor.展开更多
AIM： To determine the evidence-based values of prophylactic drainage in gastric cancer surgery. METHODS： One hundred and eight patients, who underwent subtotal gastrectomy with D1 or D2 lymph node dissection for gas...AIM： To determine the evidence-based values of prophylactic drainage in gastric cancer surgery. METHODS： One hundred and eight patients, who underwent subtotal gastrectomy with D1 or D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer between January 2001 and December 2005, were divided into drain group or no-drain group. Surgical outcome and post-operative complications within four weeks were compared between the two groups. RESULTS： No significant differences were observed between the drain group and no-drain group in terms of operating time （171 ± 42 rain vs 156 ± 39 rain）, number of post-operative days until passage of flatus （3.7 ± 0.5 d vs 3.5 ± 1.0 d）, number of post-operative days until initiation of soft diet （4.9±0.7 d vs 4.8±0.8 d）, length of post-operative hospital stay （9.3±2.2 d vs 8.4±2.4 d）, mortality rate （5.4% vs 3.8%）, and overall postoperative complication rate （21.4% vs 19.2%）. CONCLUSION： Prophylactic drainage placement is not necessary afer subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer since it does not offer additional benefits for the patients.展开更多
AIM:To evaluate the role and outcome of conventional surgery in the treatment of pyogenic liver abscess in the modern era of minimally invasive therapy. METHODS:The medical records of thirteen patients with pyogenic l...AIM:To evaluate the role and outcome of conventional surgery in the treatment of pyogenic liver abscess in the modern era of minimally invasive therapy. METHODS:The medical records of thirteen patients with pyogenic liver abscess who underwent surgical treatment between January 1995 and December 2002 were retrospectively reviewed to determine the clinical presentation, indication and nature of surgery, and out-come of surgery. RESULTS:The patients were predominantly women (10/13) with a mean age of 65 ± 17 years. Their main presenting symptoms were abdominal pain (100%) and fever (77%). The aetiologies included biliary (n = 6), cryptogenic (n = 3), portal (n = 2), and trauma (n = 2). Seven patients underwent percutaneous drainage as the initial treatment. Of these, three patients developed peritonitis secondary to peritoneal spillage. Another four patients failed to respond because of multilocula-tion. Salvage surgery was required in these patients. Six patients proceeded to straight laparotomy:two had marked sepsis and multiloculated abscess that precluded percutaneous drainage, and four presented with perito-nitis of uncertain pathology. Surgical procedures included deroofment and drainage (n = 9), liver resection (n = 3), peritoneal lavage (n = 2), cholecystectomy (n = 4), and exploration of common bile duct (n = 2). One patient required reoperation because of bleeding. Three patients required further percutaneous drainage after surgery. The overall mortality was 46%. Four patients died of multiorgan failure and two patients died of pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSION:Surgical treatment of pyogenic liver ab-scess is occasionally needed when percutaneous drainage has failed due to various reasons. Mortality rate in this group of patients has remained high.展开更多
Objective： of chronic subdural hematoma The surgical management （CSDH） is still a controversial issue, and a standard therapy has not been established because of the unclear pathogenic mechanisms in CSDH. The inten...Objective： of chronic subdural hematoma The surgical management （CSDH） is still a controversial issue, and a standard therapy has not been established because of the unclear pathogenic mechanisms in CSDH. The intention of this paper is to find a simple and efficient surgical procedure for CSDH. Methods： A retrospective study of 448 patients with CSDH by surgical treatment during 2005 to 2009 was conducted in order to compare the efficiency between two diferent primary surgical methods, i.e. twist-drill drainage without irrigation in Group A （n-178） and one burr-hole with irrigation in Group B （n=270）. The results were statistically analyzed. Results： The reoperation rates in Group A and Group B were 7.9% and 11.9% respectively. The good outcome rate was 88.8% and 73.5%, the complicatiGn was 7.9% and 20.7% in Group A and Group B, respectively. Conclusions： The burr-hole drainage with irrigation of the hematoma cavity is not beneficial to the outcome and prognosis. Irrigation is not important in the surgical treatmerit for CSDH. Thus in initial treatment, twist-drill drainage without irrigation of the hematoma cavity is recommended because it is relatively safe, time-saving and cost-effective.展开更多
文摘Since extrahepatic bile duct cancer is difficult to diagnose and to cure, a safe and radical surgical strategy is needed. In this review, the modes of infiltration and spread of extrahepatic bile duct cancer and surgical strategy are discussed. Extended hemihepatectomy, with or without pancreatoduodenectomy （PD）, plus extrahepatic bile duct resection and regional lyrnphadenectomy has recently been recognized as the standard curative treatment for hilar bile duct cancer. On the other hand, PD is the choice of treatment for middle and distal bile duct cancer. Major hepatectomy concomitant with PD （hepatopancreatoduodenectomy） has been applied to selected patients with widespread tumors. Preoperative biliary drainage （BD） followed by portal vein embolization （PVE） enables major hepatectomy in patients with hilar bile duct cancer without mortality. BD should be performed considering the surgical procedure, especially, in patients with separated intrahepatic bile ducts caused by hilar bile duct cancer. Right or left trisectoriectomy are indicated according to the tumor spread and biliary anatomy. As a result, extended radical resection offers a chance for cure of hilar bile duct cancer with improved resectability, curability, and a 5-year survival rate of 40%. A 5-year survival rate has ranged from 24% to 39% after PD for middle and distal bile duct cancer.
文摘AIM: To determine if surgical biliary bypass would provide improved quality of residual life and safe palliation in elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic head cancer. METHODS: Nineteen patients, 65 years of age or older, were managed with surgical biliary bypass (Group A). These patients were compared with 19 patients under 65 years of age who were managed with surgical biliary bypass (Group B). In addition, the results for group A were compared with those obtained from 17 patients, 65 years of age or older (Group C), who received percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage to evaluate the quality of residual life. RESULTS: Five patients (26.0%) in Group A had complications, including one intraabdominal abscess, one pulmonary atelectasis, and three wound infections. One death (5.3%) occurred on postoperative day 3. With respect to morbidity, mortality, and postoperative hospitalization, no statistically significant difference was noted between Groups A and B. The number of readmissions and the rate of recurrent jaundice were lower in Group A than in Group C, to a statistically significant degree (P = 0.019, P = 0.029, respectively). The median hospital-free survival period and themedian overall survival were also signifi cantly longer in Group A (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Surgical palliation does not increase the morbidity or mortality rates, but it does increase the survival rate and improve the quality of life in elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic head cancer.
文摘AIM： To evaluate survival rate and clinical outcome of cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS： The medical records of 34 patients with cholangiocarcinoma, seen at a single hospital between the years 1999-2006, were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS： Thirty-four patients with a median age of 75 years were included. Seventeen （50%） had painless jaundice at presentation. Sixteen （47.1%） were perihilar, 15 （44.1%） extrahepatic and three （8.8%） intrahepatic. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography （ERCP） and/or magnetic resonance cholangiography （MRCP） were used for the diagnosis. Pathologic confirmation was obtained in seven and positive cytological examination in three. Thirteen patients had co-morbidities （38.2%）. Four cases were managed with complete surgical resection. All the rest of the cases （30） were characterized as non-resectable due to advanced stage of the disease. Palliative biliary drainage was performed in 26/30 （86.6%）. The mean follow-up was 32 mo （95% CI, 20-43 too）. Overall median survival was 8.7 mo （95% CI, 2-16 mo）. The probability of 1-year, 2-year and 3-year survival was 46%, 20% and 7%, respectively. The survival was slightly longer in patients who underwent resection compared to those who did not, but this difference failed to reach statistical significance. Patients who underwent biliary drainage had an advantage in survival compared to those who did not （probability of survival 53% vs 0% at 1 year, respectively, P = 0.038）. CONCLUSION： Patients with cholangiocarcinoma were usually elderly with co-morbidities and/oradvanced disease at presentation. Even though a slight amelioration in survival with palliative biliary drainage was observed, patients had dismal outcome without resection of the tumor.
文摘AIM： To determine the evidence-based values of prophylactic drainage in gastric cancer surgery. METHODS： One hundred and eight patients, who underwent subtotal gastrectomy with D1 or D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer between January 2001 and December 2005, were divided into drain group or no-drain group. Surgical outcome and post-operative complications within four weeks were compared between the two groups. RESULTS： No significant differences were observed between the drain group and no-drain group in terms of operating time （171 ± 42 rain vs 156 ± 39 rain）, number of post-operative days until passage of flatus （3.7 ± 0.5 d vs 3.5 ± 1.0 d）, number of post-operative days until initiation of soft diet （4.9±0.7 d vs 4.8±0.8 d）, length of post-operative hospital stay （9.3±2.2 d vs 8.4±2.4 d）, mortality rate （5.4% vs 3.8%）, and overall postoperative complication rate （21.4% vs 19.2%）. CONCLUSION： Prophylactic drainage placement is not necessary afer subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer since it does not offer additional benefits for the patients.
文摘AIM:To evaluate the role and outcome of conventional surgery in the treatment of pyogenic liver abscess in the modern era of minimally invasive therapy. METHODS:The medical records of thirteen patients with pyogenic liver abscess who underwent surgical treatment between January 1995 and December 2002 were retrospectively reviewed to determine the clinical presentation, indication and nature of surgery, and out-come of surgery. RESULTS:The patients were predominantly women (10/13) with a mean age of 65 ± 17 years. Their main presenting symptoms were abdominal pain (100%) and fever (77%). The aetiologies included biliary (n = 6), cryptogenic (n = 3), portal (n = 2), and trauma (n = 2). Seven patients underwent percutaneous drainage as the initial treatment. Of these, three patients developed peritonitis secondary to peritoneal spillage. Another four patients failed to respond because of multilocula-tion. Salvage surgery was required in these patients. Six patients proceeded to straight laparotomy:two had marked sepsis and multiloculated abscess that precluded percutaneous drainage, and four presented with perito-nitis of uncertain pathology. Surgical procedures included deroofment and drainage (n = 9), liver resection (n = 3), peritoneal lavage (n = 2), cholecystectomy (n = 4), and exploration of common bile duct (n = 2). One patient required reoperation because of bleeding. Three patients required further percutaneous drainage after surgery. The overall mortality was 46%. Four patients died of multiorgan failure and two patients died of pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSION:Surgical treatment of pyogenic liver ab-scess is occasionally needed when percutaneous drainage has failed due to various reasons. Mortality rate in this group of patients has remained high.
文摘Objective： of chronic subdural hematoma The surgical management （CSDH） is still a controversial issue, and a standard therapy has not been established because of the unclear pathogenic mechanisms in CSDH. The intention of this paper is to find a simple and efficient surgical procedure for CSDH. Methods： A retrospective study of 448 patients with CSDH by surgical treatment during 2005 to 2009 was conducted in order to compare the efficiency between two diferent primary surgical methods, i.e. twist-drill drainage without irrigation in Group A （n-178） and one burr-hole with irrigation in Group B （n=270）. The results were statistically analyzed. Results： The reoperation rates in Group A and Group B were 7.9% and 11.9% respectively. The good outcome rate was 88.8% and 73.5%, the complicatiGn was 7.9% and 20.7% in Group A and Group B, respectively. Conclusions： The burr-hole drainage with irrigation of the hematoma cavity is not beneficial to the outcome and prognosis. Irrigation is not important in the surgical treatmerit for CSDH. Thus in initial treatment, twist-drill drainage without irrigation of the hematoma cavity is recommended because it is relatively safe, time-saving and cost-effective.
