抗感退热灵治疗外感发热证40例临床观察

外感发热证为外感邪毒所致,以恶寒、发热、咳嗽、流涕为主要临床表现,属于现代医学急性上呼吸道感染范畴。我院于1996年7～8月采用四川天康国药开发研究所开发的“抗感退热灵”治疗观察外感发热40例,现小结如下。

解表退热口服液治疗外感发热证临床研究

目的：我院于１９９５年７月至１９９６年３月，用解表退热口服液（本院制剂室提供）治疗外感发热证，并与功效相近的银黄口服液（山东鲁南制药厂生产）作１１随机对照，共观察６０例。其中治疗组３０例，对照组３０例。结果：试验结果表明，治疗组有效率８６．７％，治愈率６０％；对照组有效率５６．７％，治愈率２６．７％，经统计学处理Ｐ＝０．００９，两组有显著性差异。结论：解表退热口服液治疗外感发热证疗效可靠，退热作用明显，能迅速改善临床症状。

清热解毒冲(片)剂治疗外感发热证的疗效观察

本文报道新研制和通过鉴定的清热解毒冲剂和片剂对外感发热证的疗效观察,证实两种剂型总有效率分别为96.8%和94.76%,优于感冒退热冲剂和强力银翘片.达到既有高效退热作用又方便病人使用的预期目标.

羌桂香仙汤熏洗发汗治疗风寒束表证外感发热204例临床观察

[目的]观察羌桂香仙汤熏洗发汗法治疗风寒束表证外感发热疗效。[方法]对204例风寒束表证外感发热患者使用羌桂香仙汤熏洗发汗法,羌桂香仙汤(羌活三、威灵仙、桂枝、藿香各30g,生姜50g);1剂/d,水煎120mL,早晚各熏蒸1次。熏洗前后2h内禁止服用解热镇痛类药物,适量给予患者输入生理盐水,促进患者出汗。连续治疗10d为1疗程。观测临床症状、不良反应。连续治疗3疗程,判定疗效。[结果]低热68例,康复32例,显效6例,有效8例,无效22例,总有效率67.64%;中度发热90例,康复18例,显效47例,有效17例,无效8例,总有效率91.11%;高热46例,康复16例,显效26例,有效2例,无效2例,总有效率95.65%。[结论]羌桂香仙汤熏洗发汗法治疗风寒束表证外感发热效果显著,值得推广。

清热解毒存阴法治疗外感发热的临床观察

外感发热证属中医急证,具有发病率高、起病快、易传变、可以暴发流行的特点.本病属西医学的急性上呼吸道感染范畴,常规治疗西医以抗病毒、抗感染及对症处理为主.中医以解表清里为大法.本人临床上在清热解毒的基础上,早期即加养阴的方法,取得显著疗效,现总结如下.

Efficacy observation on pediatric tuina plus Chinese medicine for exogenous fever in children

Objective: To observe the clinical effects of pediatric tuina plus Chinese medicine for exogenous fever in children. Methods: A total of 150 children withexogenous fever were randomly divided based on the random digital table into a control group (75 cases) and a treatment group (75 cases). The control group was treated with oral Xiao'er Chaigui Tuire Keli (<1 year old, 0.5 bag/time;1-3 years old, 1 bag/time;4-6 years old, 1.5 bags/time), 4 times/day. The treatment group was treated with pediatric tuina plus the intervention of the control group. The amount and usage of Chinese medicine were the same as those of the control group;tuina was conducted 1 time/day. The clinical effects and adverse reactions were observed after 3 d of treatment in both groups. The recurrence was observed within 7 d after the end of treatment. Results: The total effective rate was 92.0% in the treatment group and 81.3% in the control group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). There were no obvious adverse reactions in the two groups after treatment. The recurrence rate was 1.5% in the treatment group and 13.1% in the control group. The difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: Pediatric tuina plus Chinese medicine is effective in treating children with exogenous fever.