期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Meta分析法及其在经济学中的应用 被引量:5
1
作者 张元鹏 《山东工商学院学报》 2013年第1期21-28,共8页
Meta分析法能够增强学术研究中数据处理的统计功效,有效地节省科研费用,提高论证强度;能够深入细致地分析各单个研究结果的差异性,使得学术研究中众多同类研究问题的分析结论更精确和趋于一致;能够解决原有各个独立研究所不能解决的一... Meta分析法能够增强学术研究中数据处理的统计功效,有效地节省科研费用,提高论证强度;能够深入细致地分析各单个研究结果的差异性,使得学术研究中众多同类研究问题的分析结论更精确和趋于一致;能够解决原有各个独立研究所不能解决的一些问题,并且能够引出新见解和新主张;可以按照科学规范的程序和方法处理更多的同类文献,使得综述的结果更加客观和接近实际。 展开更多
关键词 META分析 多元水平回归分析 文献综述 计量经济学 实验经济学
下载PDF
Evaluation of Self Management Behavior of Chronic Kidney Disease Patients
2
作者 Sook Hui Phua Nur Akmar Taha +1 位作者 Kiew Bing Pau Wei Yen Kong 《Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology》 2017年第4期179-188,共10页
CKD (chronic kidney disease) is a progressive disease. If it is left untreated, it can eventually result in end stage renal failure and necessitate dialysis or kidney transplantation. There is no cure for CKD; inste... CKD (chronic kidney disease) is a progressive disease. If it is left untreated, it can eventually result in end stage renal failure and necessitate dialysis or kidney transplantation. There is no cure for CKD; instead a great deal of self management over time is essential. The purpose is to evaluate self management behaviour of patients at different stages of CKD. A total of 300 CKD patients were recruited in this cross sectional study from March to July 2015 at nephrology clinic of a tertiary care setting using convenience sampling. Self management behaviour score was determined using in Partners in Health scale and was then compared at different stages of CKD. Demographic and clinical factors contributing to self management behaviour were determined. Results: There was a significant difference in age (p 〈 0.001), gender (p 〈 0.001), education level (p 〈 0.001), marital status (p 〈 0.001), duration of illness (p 〈 0.001) and number of co-morbidities (p 〈 0.001) among CKD stages. A significant difference in self management behaviour mean score was found among CKD stages (p 〈 0.001). Post hoc analysis showed self management behaviour mean score for Stage Ⅰ (mean ± SD: 77.81 ± 9.41) was significantly higher than Stage Ⅳ (mean ± SD: 70.53 ± 13.91) and Stage Ⅴ (mean ± SD: 69.54 ± 12.31). Self management behaviour mean score for Stage Ⅱ (mean ± SD: 78.46 ± 10.01) was significantly higher than Stage Ⅳ and Stage Ⅴ. Multiple linear regression revealed education level (p 〈 0.001) and number of co-morbidities (p = 0.01) as significant predictors of self management behaviour. It can be concluded that special attention should be focused on patients at late stage of CKD, especially those with diabetic nephropathy; low education level and multiple co-morbidities to improve self management behaviour. 展开更多
关键词 Self management behaviour chronic kidney disease PREDICTORS demographic factors clinical factors.
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部