It has been suggested that the importance of network architecture to species diversity and stability should be based on preference networks(comprised of niche differentiations),rather than observational networks,becau...It has been suggested that the importance of network architecture to species diversity and stability should be based on preference networks(comprised of niche differentiations),rather than observational networks,because species abundance may significantly affect interaction frequencies.Considering that resource abundance is usually greater for herbivores than parasites,we hypothesize that the abundance effect is stronger for parasitic than herbivory interactions.To test this hypothesis,we collected 80 quantitative observational networks including 34 herbivorous and 46 parasitic networks from the published literature,and derived preference networks by removing the effects of species abundance.We then determined the network nestedness using both weighted NODF and spectral radius.We also determined species degree distribution,interaction evenness,weighted connectance and robustness for both observational and preference networks.The observational networks(including both herbivory and parasitic networks)were more nested judged by weighted NODF than spectral radius.Preference networks were less nested for parasitic than herbivory networks in terms of both weighted NODF and spectral radius,possibly because removing the abundance effect increased interaction evenness.These trends indicate that the abundance effect on network nestedness is stronger for parasitic than herbivory networks.Weighted connectance and robustness were greater in most preference networks than observational networks,indicating that preference networks may have high network stability and community persistence compared with observational ones.The data indicate that future network analyses should not only address the structural difference between mutualistic and antagonistic interactions,but also between herbivory and parasitic interactions.展开更多
Aims Species-rich plant communities are more resistant to invasions.In the past decade it was demonstrated that genetic variation also has many ecological effects.In our study we aimed to test whether the patterns of ...Aims Species-rich plant communities are more resistant to invasions.In the past decade it was demonstrated that genetic variation also has many ecological effects.In our study we aimed to test whether the patterns of response to the genetic diversity of a resident species differ between colonizing species of different growth forms and whether the response is affected by soil nutrients.Methods We established experimental stands of a common grass,Festuca rubra,harbouring three levels of genetic diversity(1,6 or 18 clonal genotypes,referred to as genotypic diversity)under two soil nutrient levels.In the fourth year after the stands were established,we sowed a mixture of four colonizers into the stands:a stoloniferous legume(Trifolium repens),a broad-leaf tussock grass(Anthoxanthum odoratum),a largerosette forb(Plantago lanceolata)and a small-rosette forb(Campanula rotundifolia).We observed species establishment and growth over 3 years.We tested whether colonization success depended on genotypic diversity,specific Festuca genotypes,soil nutrients and colonizer growth form.Important Findings The colonization success and biomass of the colonizers were significantly affected by the genotypic diversity and the genotype identity of the resident clonal grass.The response,however,differed between the colonizers.The strongest response to the genotypic diversity of the resident species was observed in the tussock grass with a growth form and architecture similar to the resident species.The large-rosette species responded in early stages of growth whereas the stoloniferous legume did not respond at all.The intraspecific genotypic diversity and genotype identity of the resident species play an important role in the assembly of plant communities.展开更多
基金This study was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(grant nos.32071605,31530007 and 31870417).
文摘It has been suggested that the importance of network architecture to species diversity and stability should be based on preference networks(comprised of niche differentiations),rather than observational networks,because species abundance may significantly affect interaction frequencies.Considering that resource abundance is usually greater for herbivores than parasites,we hypothesize that the abundance effect is stronger for parasitic than herbivory interactions.To test this hypothesis,we collected 80 quantitative observational networks including 34 herbivorous and 46 parasitic networks from the published literature,and derived preference networks by removing the effects of species abundance.We then determined the network nestedness using both weighted NODF and spectral radius.We also determined species degree distribution,interaction evenness,weighted connectance and robustness for both observational and preference networks.The observational networks(including both herbivory and parasitic networks)were more nested judged by weighted NODF than spectral radius.Preference networks were less nested for parasitic than herbivory networks in terms of both weighted NODF and spectral radius,possibly because removing the abundance effect increased interaction evenness.These trends indicate that the abundance effect on network nestedness is stronger for parasitic than herbivory networks.Weighted connectance and robustness were greater in most preference networks than observational networks,indicating that preference networks may have high network stability and community persistence compared with observational ones.The data indicate that future network analyses should not only address the structural difference between mutualistic and antagonistic interactions,but also between herbivory and parasitic interactions.
基金supported by the Czech Science Foundation(grant number 19-00522S)partly by a long-term research development project of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic grant number RVO 67985939 and the Ministry of Education,Youth and Sports.
文摘Aims Species-rich plant communities are more resistant to invasions.In the past decade it was demonstrated that genetic variation also has many ecological effects.In our study we aimed to test whether the patterns of response to the genetic diversity of a resident species differ between colonizing species of different growth forms and whether the response is affected by soil nutrients.Methods We established experimental stands of a common grass,Festuca rubra,harbouring three levels of genetic diversity(1,6 or 18 clonal genotypes,referred to as genotypic diversity)under two soil nutrient levels.In the fourth year after the stands were established,we sowed a mixture of four colonizers into the stands:a stoloniferous legume(Trifolium repens),a broad-leaf tussock grass(Anthoxanthum odoratum),a largerosette forb(Plantago lanceolata)and a small-rosette forb(Campanula rotundifolia).We observed species establishment and growth over 3 years.We tested whether colonization success depended on genotypic diversity,specific Festuca genotypes,soil nutrients and colonizer growth form.Important Findings The colonization success and biomass of the colonizers were significantly affected by the genotypic diversity and the genotype identity of the resident clonal grass.The response,however,differed between the colonizers.The strongest response to the genotypic diversity of the resident species was observed in the tussock grass with a growth form and architecture similar to the resident species.The large-rosette species responded in early stages of growth whereas the stoloniferous legume did not respond at all.The intraspecific genotypic diversity and genotype identity of the resident species play an important role in the assembly of plant communities.
