期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Esomeprazole tablet vs omeprazole capsule in treating erosive esophagitis 被引量:8
1
作者 Chih-Yen Chen Ching-Liang Lu +3 位作者 Jiing-Chyuan Luo Full-Young Chang Shou-Dong Lee Yung-Ling Lai 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2005年第20期3112-3117,共6页
AIM: Esomeprazole, an oral S-form of omeprazole, has been a greater acid inhibitor over omeprazole in treating acid-related diseases. Only less published data is available to confirm its efficacy for Asian people. The... AIM: Esomeprazole, an oral S-form of omeprazole, has been a greater acid inhibitor over omeprazole in treating acid-related diseases. Only less published data is available to confirm its efficacy for Asian people. Therefore, a perspective, double-blind, randomized comparison of esomeprazole tablets 40 mg (Nexium(?)) vs omeprazole capsules 20 mg (Losec(?)) in treating Chinese subjects with erosive/ulcerative reflux esophagitis (EE) was conducted. METHODS: A total of 48 EE patients were enrolled and randomized into two treatment groups under 8-wk therapy: 25 receiving esomeprazole, while another 23 receiving omeprazole treatment. Finally, 44 completed the whole 8-wk therapy. RESULTS: The difference in healing EE between two groups was 22.7% (72.7% vs 50.0%), not reaching significant value (P = 0.204). The median of the first time needed in relieving heartburn sensation was 1 d for both groups and the remission rates for heartburn on the 1st d after treatment were 77.3% and 65%, respectively (NS). The scores of various reflux relieving symptoms evaluated either by patients or by investigators were not different. Regarding drug safety, 28% of esomeprazole group and 26.1% of omeprazole group reported at least one episode of adverse effects, while constipation and skin dryness were the common side effects in both groups (NS). CONCLUSION: Esomeprazole 40 mg is an effective and safe drug at least comparable to omeprazole in treating Chinese EE patients. 展开更多
关键词 ESOMEPRAZOLE Someprazole ESOPHAGITIS
下载PDF
我国六省份奥美拉唑(片剂)价格对比分析
2
作者 胡宗铃 傅鸿鹏 《中国卫生经济》 北大核心 2019年第1期73-77,共5页
目的:研究我国六个省份的奥美拉唑价格,为理顺我国药品招标采购价格提出合理性建议。方法:对比分析法。结果:各省份质量层次划分依据不合理,进口与国产药价格差距过大,招标采购价与零售价差距不合理。结论:在全国范围内推行统一、合理... 目的:研究我国六个省份的奥美拉唑价格,为理顺我国药品招标采购价格提出合理性建议。方法:对比分析法。结果:各省份质量层次划分依据不合理,进口与国产药价格差距过大,招标采购价与零售价差距不合理。结论:在全国范围内推行统一、合理的质量层次划分依据,加快推进仿制药一致性评价;对于零售价格与招标价格相差较大的企业,应调查其差距原因,并根据实情实行相应的管理措施。 展开更多
关键词 奥美拉唑(片剂) 价格对比 质量分层 药品类型
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部