目的:本文主要探讨HPV E6/E7 mRNA与薄层液基细胞学检测(Thinprep Cytologic Test, TCT)结合在子宫颈癌及癌前病变筛查中的价值。方法:选取2018年1月~2022年12月期间在延安市人民医院就诊的均进行过HPV E6/E7 mRNA、TCT的宫颈异常患者67...目的:本文主要探讨HPV E6/E7 mRNA与薄层液基细胞学检测(Thinprep Cytologic Test, TCT)结合在子宫颈癌及癌前病变筛查中的价值。方法:选取2018年1月~2022年12月期间在延安市人民医院就诊的均进行过HPV E6/E7 mRNA、TCT的宫颈异常患者674例,以活检组织病理结果为金标准,分析不同检查方法对宫颈癌及癌前病变的筛查价值。结果:674例活检阳性的病例中:HPV E6/E7 mPNA检出阳性448例,TCT检出阳性371例;HPV E6/E7、TCT检查的诊断一致性为63.35%;与联合检测比较,HPV E6/E7 mRNA、TCT在宫颈癌前病变的检测中符合率均较低,差异均有统计学意义(P Objective: To analyze clinical application value of HPV E6/E7 mRNA and Thinprep cytologic test (TCT) detection in screening for cervical lesions. Methods: A total of 674 patients with cervical abnormalities who underwent HPV E6/E7 mRNA and TCT in Yan’an people’s Hospital from January 2018 to December 2022 were selected. With the histopathological results as the gold standard, the screening value of different examination methods for cervical cancer was analyzed. Results: Histopathological biopsies showed that the diagnostic concordance of HPV E6/E7 and TCT was 62.42%, and the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of HPV E6/E7, TCT and colposcopy in detecting HSIL + SCC were all lower compared with the combined test, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion The combination of HPV E6/E7 mPNA and TCT improve the value of screening for cervical cancer and may help in better clinical diagnosis and treatment.展开更多
目的:探讨高危型人乳头瘤病毒(high-risk human papillomavirus,HR-HPV)分型检测与液基薄层细胞学检查(thin-prep cytology test,TCT)在宫颈癌前病变及宫颈癌筛查中的临床价值。方法:选取2020年4月至2021年3月在南京市中西医结合医院妇...目的:探讨高危型人乳头瘤病毒(high-risk human papillomavirus,HR-HPV)分型检测与液基薄层细胞学检查(thin-prep cytology test,TCT)在宫颈癌前病变及宫颈癌筛查中的临床价值。方法:选取2020年4月至2021年3月在南京市中西医结合医院妇科门诊进行宫颈癌筛查的150例患者为研究对象,所有研究对象均行HR-HPV分型检测、TCT及阴道镜下宫颈活检组织病理检查;以组织病理学检查结果为“金标准”(正常或炎症为阴性,其余诊断结果为阳性),分析HR-HPV分型检测、TCT及二者联合检测的阳性预测值、阴性预测值、灵敏度、特异度及准确性,并绘制2种检测与联合检测筛查宫颈癌前病变和宫颈癌的受试者操作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线。结果:150例患者中,组织病理学诊断结果为阴性者82例,阳性者68例。以病理学检查结果为“金标准”,HR-HPV分型检测的灵敏度为89.71%,特异度为74.39%,阳性预测值为74.39%,阴性预测值为89.71%,准确性为81.33%;TCT的灵敏度为63.24%,特异度为87.80%,阳性预测值为81.13%,阴性预测值为74.23%,准确性为76.67%。HR-HPV分型检测的灵敏度及阴性预测值高于TCT(P<0.05),TCT的特异度高于HR-HPV分型检测(P<0.05)。ROC曲线显示:HR-HPV分型检测的曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)为0.820(95%CI 0.750~0.878),TCT的AUC为0.755(95%CI 0.678~0.822),联合检测的AUC为0.813(95%CI 0.742~0.872)。结论:相比TCT,HR-HPV分型检测在宫颈癌前病变和宫颈癌筛查中有较好的诊断效能,HR-HPV联合TCT不能进一步提高筛查效能。展开更多
文摘目的:本文主要探讨HPV E6/E7 mRNA与薄层液基细胞学检测(Thinprep Cytologic Test, TCT)结合在子宫颈癌及癌前病变筛查中的价值。方法:选取2018年1月~2022年12月期间在延安市人民医院就诊的均进行过HPV E6/E7 mRNA、TCT的宫颈异常患者674例,以活检组织病理结果为金标准,分析不同检查方法对宫颈癌及癌前病变的筛查价值。结果:674例活检阳性的病例中:HPV E6/E7 mPNA检出阳性448例,TCT检出阳性371例;HPV E6/E7、TCT检查的诊断一致性为63.35%;与联合检测比较,HPV E6/E7 mRNA、TCT在宫颈癌前病变的检测中符合率均较低,差异均有统计学意义(P Objective: To analyze clinical application value of HPV E6/E7 mRNA and Thinprep cytologic test (TCT) detection in screening for cervical lesions. Methods: A total of 674 patients with cervical abnormalities who underwent HPV E6/E7 mRNA and TCT in Yan’an people’s Hospital from January 2018 to December 2022 were selected. With the histopathological results as the gold standard, the screening value of different examination methods for cervical cancer was analyzed. Results: Histopathological biopsies showed that the diagnostic concordance of HPV E6/E7 and TCT was 62.42%, and the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of HPV E6/E7, TCT and colposcopy in detecting HSIL + SCC were all lower compared with the combined test, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion The combination of HPV E6/E7 mPNA and TCT improve the value of screening for cervical cancer and may help in better clinical diagnosis and treatment.
文摘目的:探讨高危型人乳头瘤病毒(high-risk human papillomavirus,HR-HPV)分型检测与液基薄层细胞学检查(thin-prep cytology test,TCT)在宫颈癌前病变及宫颈癌筛查中的临床价值。方法:选取2020年4月至2021年3月在南京市中西医结合医院妇科门诊进行宫颈癌筛查的150例患者为研究对象,所有研究对象均行HR-HPV分型检测、TCT及阴道镜下宫颈活检组织病理检查;以组织病理学检查结果为“金标准”(正常或炎症为阴性,其余诊断结果为阳性),分析HR-HPV分型检测、TCT及二者联合检测的阳性预测值、阴性预测值、灵敏度、特异度及准确性,并绘制2种检测与联合检测筛查宫颈癌前病变和宫颈癌的受试者操作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线。结果:150例患者中,组织病理学诊断结果为阴性者82例,阳性者68例。以病理学检查结果为“金标准”,HR-HPV分型检测的灵敏度为89.71%,特异度为74.39%,阳性预测值为74.39%,阴性预测值为89.71%,准确性为81.33%;TCT的灵敏度为63.24%,特异度为87.80%,阳性预测值为81.13%,阴性预测值为74.23%,准确性为76.67%。HR-HPV分型检测的灵敏度及阴性预测值高于TCT(P<0.05),TCT的特异度高于HR-HPV分型检测(P<0.05)。ROC曲线显示:HR-HPV分型检测的曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)为0.820(95%CI 0.750~0.878),TCT的AUC为0.755(95%CI 0.678~0.822),联合检测的AUC为0.813(95%CI 0.742~0.872)。结论:相比TCT,HR-HPV分型检测在宫颈癌前病变和宫颈癌筛查中有较好的诊断效能,HR-HPV联合TCT不能进一步提高筛查效能。