Background and objective： Rivaroxaban is a new oral anticoagulant for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation （NVAF）, which has less drug-food interaction than warfarin. We conducted thi...Background and objective： Rivaroxaban is a new oral anticoagulant for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation （NVAF）, which has less drug-food interaction than warfarin. We conducted this pro- spective randomized study to evaluate the metabolic benefits as well as the safety and efficacy with rivaroxaban versus warfarin in patients with NVAF following radiofrequency catheter ablation （RFCA）. Methods： From April to July 2014, 60 patients with NVAF undergoing RFCA were prospectively enrolled in our study. Following RFCA, all patients were randomly assigned to receive rivaroxaban （Group R, n=30） or warfarin （Group W, n=30）. Metabolic indices including serum total protein, albumin, globulin, and high-density lipoprotein （HDL） as well as bleeding, stroke, and systemic thromboembolism events were evaluated and compared during follow-up after 15, 30, 60, and 90 d of RFCA procedure. Results： Serum total protein, albumin, globulin, and HDL levels were all significantly elevated at each follow-up stage in Group R when compared to the baseline （P〈0.05 respectively）. In Group W, the metabolic indices decreased at first and then had an increasing trend. There were no deaths or thromboembolic complications in each group. The prevalence of total bleeding complications was similar between Group R and Group W （11/30, 36.7% vs. 10/30, 33.3%, P=0.70）. Conclusions： Patients with NVAF receiving rivaroxaban after RFCA procedures appear to benefit from a metabolic perspective compared with warfarin, providing practical clinical reference for the choice of the anticoagulant. Rivaroxaban seems to be as safe and effective in preventing thromboembolic events as warfarin for these patients.展开更多
文摘Background and objective： Rivaroxaban is a new oral anticoagulant for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation （NVAF）, which has less drug-food interaction than warfarin. We conducted this pro- spective randomized study to evaluate the metabolic benefits as well as the safety and efficacy with rivaroxaban versus warfarin in patients with NVAF following radiofrequency catheter ablation （RFCA）. Methods： From April to July 2014, 60 patients with NVAF undergoing RFCA were prospectively enrolled in our study. Following RFCA, all patients were randomly assigned to receive rivaroxaban （Group R, n=30） or warfarin （Group W, n=30）. Metabolic indices including serum total protein, albumin, globulin, and high-density lipoprotein （HDL） as well as bleeding, stroke, and systemic thromboembolism events were evaluated and compared during follow-up after 15, 30, 60, and 90 d of RFCA procedure. Results： Serum total protein, albumin, globulin, and HDL levels were all significantly elevated at each follow-up stage in Group R when compared to the baseline （P〈0.05 respectively）. In Group W, the metabolic indices decreased at first and then had an increasing trend. There were no deaths or thromboembolic complications in each group. The prevalence of total bleeding complications was similar between Group R and Group W （11/30, 36.7% vs. 10/30, 33.3%, P=0.70）. Conclusions： Patients with NVAF receiving rivaroxaban after RFCA procedures appear to benefit from a metabolic perspective compared with warfarin, providing practical clinical reference for the choice of the anticoagulant. Rivaroxaban seems to be as safe and effective in preventing thromboembolic events as warfarin for these patients.
