The academic circle thinks that Maowusu area was not desertized before Song Dynaty according to the existence of many urban ruins of Han Dynasty and Tongwan city in Maowusu area This article thinks that these special ...The academic circle thinks that Maowusu area was not desertized before Song Dynaty according to the existence of many urban ruins of Han Dynasty and Tongwan city in Maowusu area This article thinks that these special archaeological ruins with military nature can’t be the base to reflect whether the environment in the area is good or bad It thinks that the year when the area was desertized dates back to Xia Dynasty,the question is proved by historic documents and the bases provided by the geology in the Quaternary Period It points out that there are desert period and interval desert in Maowusu area because of the constraint of the environmental factors like climate Before Qin and Han Dynasty, because the human action to the nature was very limited which made the equilibrium relationship between the human beings and the nature coordinated The damage of the ecological balance in the desert period will be gradually recovered in the interval desert period The development and migration in Qin and Han Dynasty cost hundreds of thousands of yuan,which made the weak environment in the area unbearable and the damage in the desert period could not be recovered,which made it ineviable that Maowusu was desertized and the adverse environmental factors led to the complete desertization of Maowusu展开更多
The discovery and verification of Lingkou Culture filled up the gap between Baijiacun Culture (PreYangshao)and Yangshao Culture.The remains scarcely found similler to Lingkou Culture were laid up on Baijiacun remains ...The discovery and verification of Lingkou Culture filled up the gap between Baijiacun Culture (PreYangshao)and Yangshao Culture.The remains scarcely found similler to Lingkou Culture were laid up on Baijiacun remains and underneath the remains of Banpo Type of Yangshao at Lingkou site (this Culture got its name from this site),and various components of Lingkou showed transmitting characteristics between Baijiacun and Yangshao,therefore,it should be later than Baijiacun and earlier than Yangshao.The themoluminescent date of Lingkou site are below (from bottom layer to up):T6⑧，7300±338；T6⑦，7270±387；T6⑥b，6930±320；T6⑥a,6900±102;T6⑤,6600±180;T6④,6420±228;T6③,6220±407BP.T6⑧-⑤are layers of Lingkou Culture,④---③are remains of Banpo Type.Baijiacun dated 7900-7020BP,Yangshao dated 6450-4850BP.Therefore ,it is reasonable and believable that Lingkou dated 7300-6600BP.展开更多
Concerning the dating of inscriptions on animal bones and tortoise shells, many debates have not been solved in academic circles. Among them the date of the greater-character oracle inscriptions in the “Shi dui” gro...Concerning the dating of inscriptions on animal bones and tortoise shells, many debates have not been solved in academic circles. Among them the date of the greater-character oracle inscriptions in the “Shi dui” group constitutes the focus of controversy. Presently some scholars in Chinabelieve that these inscriptions are the earliest on the Yin Ruins. In the light of the data of oracle inscriptions archaeologists have discovered recently, the author makes a comparative study of the inscriptions under discussion with those earlier than the Wu Ding reign, those from Huayuanzhuang and thoseoccurring in the “Bin 宾” group and belonging to the Wu Ding reign, and examines them in the form andstyle of characters, as well as in the grammatical aspect. These analyses come to the conclusion that theoracle inscriptions in question are different from others and should be assigned to another system, so theycan not be taken as the earliest oracle inscriptions from the Yin Ruins.展开更多
文摘The academic circle thinks that Maowusu area was not desertized before Song Dynaty according to the existence of many urban ruins of Han Dynasty and Tongwan city in Maowusu area This article thinks that these special archaeological ruins with military nature can’t be the base to reflect whether the environment in the area is good or bad It thinks that the year when the area was desertized dates back to Xia Dynasty,the question is proved by historic documents and the bases provided by the geology in the Quaternary Period It points out that there are desert period and interval desert in Maowusu area because of the constraint of the environmental factors like climate Before Qin and Han Dynasty, because the human action to the nature was very limited which made the equilibrium relationship between the human beings and the nature coordinated The damage of the ecological balance in the desert period will be gradually recovered in the interval desert period The development and migration in Qin and Han Dynasty cost hundreds of thousands of yuan,which made the weak environment in the area unbearable and the damage in the desert period could not be recovered,which made it ineviable that Maowusu was desertized and the adverse environmental factors led to the complete desertization of Maowusu
文摘The discovery and verification of Lingkou Culture filled up the gap between Baijiacun Culture (PreYangshao)and Yangshao Culture.The remains scarcely found similler to Lingkou Culture were laid up on Baijiacun remains and underneath the remains of Banpo Type of Yangshao at Lingkou site (this Culture got its name from this site),and various components of Lingkou showed transmitting characteristics between Baijiacun and Yangshao,therefore,it should be later than Baijiacun and earlier than Yangshao.The themoluminescent date of Lingkou site are below (from bottom layer to up):T6⑧，7300±338；T6⑦，7270±387；T6⑥b，6930±320；T6⑥a,6900±102;T6⑤,6600±180;T6④,6420±228;T6③,6220±407BP.T6⑧-⑤are layers of Lingkou Culture,④---③are remains of Banpo Type.Baijiacun dated 7900-7020BP,Yangshao dated 6450-4850BP.Therefore ,it is reasonable and believable that Lingkou dated 7300-6600BP.
文摘Concerning the dating of inscriptions on animal bones and tortoise shells, many debates have not been solved in academic circles. Among them the date of the greater-character oracle inscriptions in the “Shi dui” group constitutes the focus of controversy. Presently some scholars in Chinabelieve that these inscriptions are the earliest on the Yin Ruins. In the light of the data of oracle inscriptions archaeologists have discovered recently, the author makes a comparative study of the inscriptions under discussion with those earlier than the Wu Ding reign, those from Huayuanzhuang and thoseoccurring in the “Bin 宾” group and belonging to the Wu Ding reign, and examines them in the form andstyle of characters, as well as in the grammatical aspect. These analyses come to the conclusion that theoracle inscriptions in question are different from others and should be assigned to another system, so theycan not be taken as the earliest oracle inscriptions from the Yin Ruins.
