Aims: As arrhythmias in the long QT syndrome(LQTS) are triggered by heart rate deceleration or acceleration, we speculated that the sudden bradycardia and subsequent tachycardia that follow adenosine injection would u...Aims: As arrhythmias in the long QT syndrome(LQTS) are triggered by heart rate deceleration or acceleration, we speculated that the sudden bradycardia and subsequent tachycardia that follow adenosine injection would unravel QT changes of diagnostic value in patients with LQTS. Methods and results: Patients(18 LQTS and 20 controls) received intravenous adenosine during sinus rhythm. Adenosine was injected at incremental doses until atrioventricular block or sinus pauses lasting 3 s occurred. The QT duration and morphology were studied at baseline and at the time of maximal bradycardia and subsequent tachycardia. Despite simitar degree of adenosine- induced bradycardia(longest R- R 1.7± 0.7 vs. 2.2± 1.3 s for LQTS and controls, P=NS), the QT interval of LQT patients increased by 15.8± 13.1% , whereas the QT of controls increased by only 1.5± 6.7% (P< 0.001). Similarly, despite similar reflex tachycardia(shortest R- R 0.58± 0.07 vs. 0.55± 0.07s for LQT patients and controls, P=NS), LQTS patients developed greater QT prolongation(QTc=569± 53 vs. 458± 58 ms for LQT patients and controls, P< 0.001). The best discriminator was the QTc during maximal bradycardia. Notched T- waves were observed in 72% of LQT patients but in only 5% of controls during adenosine- induced bradycardia(P< 0.001). Conclusion: By provoking transient bradycardia followed by sinus tachycardia, this adenosine challenge test triggers QT changes that appear to be useful in distinguishing patients with LQTS from healthy controls.展开更多
文摘Aims: As arrhythmias in the long QT syndrome(LQTS) are triggered by heart rate deceleration or acceleration, we speculated that the sudden bradycardia and subsequent tachycardia that follow adenosine injection would unravel QT changes of diagnostic value in patients with LQTS. Methods and results: Patients(18 LQTS and 20 controls) received intravenous adenosine during sinus rhythm. Adenosine was injected at incremental doses until atrioventricular block or sinus pauses lasting 3 s occurred. The QT duration and morphology were studied at baseline and at the time of maximal bradycardia and subsequent tachycardia. Despite simitar degree of adenosine- induced bradycardia(longest R- R 1.7± 0.7 vs. 2.2± 1.3 s for LQTS and controls, P=NS), the QT interval of LQT patients increased by 15.8± 13.1% , whereas the QT of controls increased by only 1.5± 6.7% (P< 0.001). Similarly, despite similar reflex tachycardia(shortest R- R 0.58± 0.07 vs. 0.55± 0.07s for LQT patients and controls, P=NS), LQTS patients developed greater QT prolongation(QTc=569± 53 vs. 458± 58 ms for LQT patients and controls, P< 0.001). The best discriminator was the QTc during maximal bradycardia. Notched T- waves were observed in 72% of LQT patients but in only 5% of controls during adenosine- induced bradycardia(P< 0.001). Conclusion: By provoking transient bradycardia followed by sinus tachycardia, this adenosine challenge test triggers QT changes that appear to be useful in distinguishing patients with LQTS from healthy controls.
