试论延滞损失的几个法律问题

In a voyage charter party, it ls very lmportant that the shipowner can finish the carriage of goods within a reasonable time. If the vessel is delayed during the loading, discharging or transporting, loss or damage will occur- So there is always a de-murrage clause in a voy. C/P. But in some circumstances, the damage for delay does not belong to demurrage and can not be compensated by demurrage. Then the damage for detention will occur, which is a different kind of damage from demurrage. But in shipping practlce, many people are confused about them. This article tries to d1scuss the defination of damage for detentlon and points out the differences between demurrage and damage for de- tention.

浅谈滞期费和延滞损失的差异

滞期费和延滞损失是不定期船业务中很重要的两个概念。但是实践中往往有人把这两者的概念混淆甚至等同起来,从而引发纠纷。本文试图从它们的基本含义、法律性质、表现形式入手来分析这两者的若干差异性。

出租人为索要延滞损失而拒绝卸货可构成胁迫

合同中的出租人无视合同约定的滞期费条款,以延误造成经济损失即延滞损失未获赔偿为由拒绝卸货的行为,不属于行使留置权;承租人为避免货物被长期扣留进而发生货损,同意按照高额滞期费率赔偿延滞损失,属于受胁迫作出的法律行为,承租人依法有权在法定期限内请求法院予以撤销。