Objective： To analyze moxibustion reports published in the journals of Science Citation Index （SCI）, so as to grasp the current publication development of researches on moxibustion and to provide submission referen...Objective： To analyze moxibustion reports published in the journals of Science Citation Index （SCI）, so as to grasp the current publication development of researches on moxibustion and to provide submission reference to such studies in the future. Methods： Moxibustion reports were searched on PubMed and ISI web of knowledge, and 2 reviewers extracted data independently for analysis. Studies qualified were analyzed from eight aspects： publishing amount, research type, source journal, impact factor （IF）, source country, source academy, indication and effect evaluation, comparison of studies between China and other countries. Results and Conclusion： Fifty-three associated reports published in journals of SC1 were selected. The publishing amount of moxibustion reports increased year by year, and majority of these reports were clinical researches and system reviews. IFs of most journals were less than 5. Diseases involved were various; however, the curative effect of moxibustion was still uncertain worldwide. The mechanism of moxibustion was not fully described, either. Further high-quality and convictive researches were still needed to define the curative effect of moxibustion and to increase the SCI publishing amounts.展开更多
文摘加费尔德(Eugene Garfield)博士是美国著名的情报学家,前美国情报学会主席。上世纪60年代以来,他先后创办了《科学引文索引》(SCI)、《艺术和人文科学引文索引》(A&HCI)、《社会科学引文索引》(SSCI)、《现刊目次》(Current contents)、《科技会议录索引》(ISTP)等大型索引刊物。45年来,三大引文索引刊物从最初的印刷版,经过光盘版,如今已发展为网络版ISI Web ofKnowledge…,总之,加费尔德博士及其创办的美国科技信息研究所(ISI)为文献信息检索开辟了一条新的蹊径,并为文献计量学、科学计量学的发展奠定了基础。最近南京农业大学信息管理系侯汉清教授寄来了加费尔德博士2002年12月为其专著《引文索引的理论和应用》中译本新写的序言。本刊用英汉对照的形式全文发表这一序言,先飨读者。此书的中译本在加费尔德博士的大力支持下今年将由北京图书馆出版社正式出版。
基金supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(81072881)
文摘Objective： To analyze moxibustion reports published in the journals of Science Citation Index （SCI）, so as to grasp the current publication development of researches on moxibustion and to provide submission reference to such studies in the future. Methods： Moxibustion reports were searched on PubMed and ISI web of knowledge, and 2 reviewers extracted data independently for analysis. Studies qualified were analyzed from eight aspects： publishing amount, research type, source journal, impact factor （IF）, source country, source academy, indication and effect evaluation, comparison of studies between China and other countries. Results and Conclusion： Fifty-three associated reports published in journals of SC1 were selected. The publishing amount of moxibustion reports increased year by year, and majority of these reports were clinical researches and system reviews. IFs of most journals were less than 5. Diseases involved were various; however, the curative effect of moxibustion was still uncertain worldwide. The mechanism of moxibustion was not fully described, either. Further high-quality and convictive researches were still needed to define the curative effect of moxibustion and to increase the SCI publishing amounts.
