期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
高校教师循环式绩效评价模式探究
1
作者 丁娟娟 魏冠荣 《教育教学论坛》 2011年第30期132-134,共3页
我国多数高校现行的"奖惩式"教师绩效评价模式,是一种只重结果不重培养、对教师资源进行掠夺式使用的评价模式。国外倡导的"发展性"教师绩效评价模式虽然是教师绩效评价的一种趋势,但由于种种原因并不能直接应用于... 我国多数高校现行的"奖惩式"教师绩效评价模式,是一种只重结果不重培养、对教师资源进行掠夺式使用的评价模式。国外倡导的"发展性"教师绩效评价模式虽然是教师绩效评价的一种趋势,但由于种种原因并不能直接应用于我国。因此,本文在充分研究这两种评价模式的基础上,着眼于教师的终身职业发展,构建了循环式高校教师绩效评价模式。 展开更多
关键词 奖惩式评价 发展性评价 循环式评价
下载PDF
Contrastive Study of the Circular Economy of Coal Resource City Based on Ecological Efficiency and C Model
2
作者 于会录 董锁成 +2 位作者 李宇 李泽红 李飞 《Journal of Resources and Ecology》 CSCD 2016年第5期323-333,共11页
Being a developing country, the evaluation of Chinese circular economy should have its particular crite- rion that suits for specific national conditions. With the growth of economy, Chinese environmental loads should... Being a developing country, the evaluation of Chinese circular economy should have its particular crite- rion that suits for specific national conditions. With the growth of economy, Chinese environmental loads should be permitted to increase at an appropriate speed. Based on this concept, this paper divides the process of evaluation into two parts which include evaluation of development level and evaluation of development performance. Firstly, this paper sets up a reference system which includes Zaozhuang City of Shandong Province, Jiaozuo City of Henan province, Shizuishan City of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region and China that is regarded as a region respectively, analyzes the development level of circular economy of coal resource cities based on the evaluation indicator of ecological efficiency, and puts forward the future direction of circular economy of coal resource cities. Secondly, based on C Model of Circular Economy, this paper constructs the measurement model of development perform- ance in which study regions are analyzed in a particular period that is from 2000 to 2020, and evaluates the de- velopment performance of circular economy for study regions according to the relationship of growth multiples between economic scale and environmental loads. We can draw several main conclusions: firstly, the development pathways of all four study regions belong to type I[ which resource efficiency is preferred. Secondly, the com- prehensive energy consumption efficiencies of coal resource cities were left far behind by China's average level. Thirdly, the circular economies of all study regions have achieved remarkable progress. Fourthly, the development level of circular economy can be evaluated from two dimensions which consist of horizontal comparison method and vertical comparison method. Fifthly, C model is an appropriate development model that suits for Chinese na- tional conditions and could be selected as an important method to evaluate regional development performance of circular economy. 展开更多
关键词 ecological efficiency C Model circular economy identification index EVALUATION coal resource city
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部