AIM:To assess the outcome of patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis treated by percutaneous drainage with special focus on the influence of drainage size and number. METHODS:We performed a retrospective analysis...AIM:To assess the outcome of patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis treated by percutaneous drainage with special focus on the influence of drainage size and number. METHODS:We performed a retrospective analysis of 80 patients with acute pancreatitis requiring percutaneous drainage therapy for infected necroses. Endpoints were mortality and length of hospital stay. The influence of drainage characteristics such as the median drainage size, the largest drainage size per patient and the total drainage plane per patient on patient outcome was evaluated. RESULTS:Total hospital survival was 66%. Thirty-four patients out of all 80 patients (43%) survived acute necrotizing pancreatitis with percutaneous drainage therapy only. Eighteen patients out of all 80 patients needed additional percutaneous necrosectomy (23%). Ten out of these patients required surgical necrosectomy in addition, 6 patients received open necrosectomy without prior percutaneous necrosectomy. Elective surgery was performed in 3 patients receiving cholecystectomy and one patient receiving resection of the parathyroid gland. The number of drainages ranged from one to fourteen per patient. The drainage diameter ranged from 8 French catheters to 24 French catheters. The median drainage size as well as the largest drainage size used per patient and the total drainage area used per patient did not show statistically significant influence on mortality. CONCLUSION:Percutaneous drainage therapy is an effective tool for treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis.Large bore drainages did not prove to be more effective in controlling the septic focus.展开更多
Background:Conservative therapy for Crohn’s disease(CD)-related acute bowel obstruction is essential to avoid emergent surgery.The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of using a long intestinal decompression...Background:Conservative therapy for Crohn’s disease(CD)-related acute bowel obstruction is essential to avoid emergent surgery.The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of using a long intestinal decompression tube(LT)in treatment of CD with acute intestinal obstruction.Methods:This is a prospective observational study.Comparative analysis was performed in CD patients treated with LT(the LT group)and nasogastric tube(the GT group).The primary outcome was the avoidance of emergent surgery.Additionally,predictive factors for failure of decompression and subsequent surgery were investigated.Results:There were 27 and 42 CD patients treated with LT and GT,respectively,in emergent situations.Twelve(44.4%)patients using LT were managed conservatively without laparotomy,while only nine(21.4%)patients in the GT group were spared from emergent surgery(P<0.05).Both in surgery-free and in surgery patients,the time to alleviation of symptoms was significantly shorter in the LT groups than in the GT groups(both P<0.01).C-reactive protein decrease after intubation and 48-hour drainage volume>500mL were predictors of unavoidable surgery(both P<0.05).The rate of temporary stoma and incidence of incision infection in the LT surgery group were significantly lower than those in the GT group(both P<0.05).No significant differences were observed in the frequency of medical and surgical recurrences between the LT and GT groups(all P>0.05).Conclusions:Endoscopic placement of LT could improve the emergent status in CD patients with acute bowel obstruction.The drainage output and changes in C-reactive protein after intubation could serve as practical predictive indices for subsequent surgery.Compared to traditional GT decompression,LT decompression was associated with fewer short-term complications and did not appear to affect long-term recurrence.展开更多
文摘AIM:To assess the outcome of patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis treated by percutaneous drainage with special focus on the influence of drainage size and number. METHODS:We performed a retrospective analysis of 80 patients with acute pancreatitis requiring percutaneous drainage therapy for infected necroses. Endpoints were mortality and length of hospital stay. The influence of drainage characteristics such as the median drainage size, the largest drainage size per patient and the total drainage plane per patient on patient outcome was evaluated. RESULTS:Total hospital survival was 66%. Thirty-four patients out of all 80 patients (43%) survived acute necrotizing pancreatitis with percutaneous drainage therapy only. Eighteen patients out of all 80 patients needed additional percutaneous necrosectomy (23%). Ten out of these patients required surgical necrosectomy in addition, 6 patients received open necrosectomy without prior percutaneous necrosectomy. Elective surgery was performed in 3 patients receiving cholecystectomy and one patient receiving resection of the parathyroid gland. The number of drainages ranged from one to fourteen per patient. The drainage diameter ranged from 8 French catheters to 24 French catheters. The median drainage size as well as the largest drainage size used per patient and the total drainage area used per patient did not show statistically significant influence on mortality. CONCLUSION:Percutaneous drainage therapy is an effective tool for treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis.Large bore drainages did not prove to be more effective in controlling the septic focus.
基金This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(81770556).
文摘Background:Conservative therapy for Crohn’s disease(CD)-related acute bowel obstruction is essential to avoid emergent surgery.The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of using a long intestinal decompression tube(LT)in treatment of CD with acute intestinal obstruction.Methods:This is a prospective observational study.Comparative analysis was performed in CD patients treated with LT(the LT group)and nasogastric tube(the GT group).The primary outcome was the avoidance of emergent surgery.Additionally,predictive factors for failure of decompression and subsequent surgery were investigated.Results:There were 27 and 42 CD patients treated with LT and GT,respectively,in emergent situations.Twelve(44.4%)patients using LT were managed conservatively without laparotomy,while only nine(21.4%)patients in the GT group were spared from emergent surgery(P<0.05).Both in surgery-free and in surgery patients,the time to alleviation of symptoms was significantly shorter in the LT groups than in the GT groups(both P<0.01).C-reactive protein decrease after intubation and 48-hour drainage volume>500mL were predictors of unavoidable surgery(both P<0.05).The rate of temporary stoma and incidence of incision infection in the LT surgery group were significantly lower than those in the GT group(both P<0.05).No significant differences were observed in the frequency of medical and surgical recurrences between the LT and GT groups(all P>0.05).Conclusions:Endoscopic placement of LT could improve the emergent status in CD patients with acute bowel obstruction.The drainage output and changes in C-reactive protein after intubation could serve as practical predictive indices for subsequent surgery.Compared to traditional GT decompression,LT decompression was associated with fewer short-term complications and did not appear to affect long-term recurrence.
