商标恶意异议法律规制研究

现行《商标法》几经修改,商标异议制度日趋完善,但恶意异议现象仍未被有效遏制。基于商标在经济市场中日益重要的地位及商标恶意异议行为的社会危害性,对商标恶意异议现象进行法律规制具有高度必要性。明晰商标恶意异议现象的概念后,通过梳理域内外关于商标恶意异议的相关法律规制,总结可参考经验,结合我国实践情况,探索立法、司法、行政层面上的规制手段,构建完备详细的中国特色商标异议制度,有效维护市场诚信公平竞争,保障社会权益,促进创新发展。After several amendments to the current “Trademark Law”, the trademark objection system has become increasingly perfect, but the phenomenon of malicious objection has not been effectively contained. Based on the increasingly important status of trademark in the economic market and the social harm of the malicious objection of trademark, it is highly necessary to regulate the phenomenon of malicious objection of trademark. After clarifying the concept of the phenomenon of malicious objection to trademarks, by combing the relevant legal regulations on malicious objection to trademarks inside and outside the domain, summarizing the reference experience, combining with the practice of China, exploring the regulatory means at the legislative, judicial and administrative levels, building a complete and detailed trademark objection system with Chinese characteristics, effectively maintaining market integrity and fair competition, protecting social rights and interests, and promoting innovation and development.

论我国商标异议制度的改革——兼评恶意异议的治理

本文在比较和借鉴的基础上,通过研究和分析英国、美国、日本和欧盟的商标异议制度,指出我国现行商标异议制度存在的问题和缺陷,提出在我国《商标法》第三次修改时应增加完善的有关商标确权中的异议程序的规定,如限制提出商标异议的主体、明确规定商标异议的理由与事实、简化商标异议程序、商标异议程序的设置改革以及恶意异议的治理等问题,使我国商标异议制度能够朝着更加灵活和实用的方向进步。

关于我国商标异议制度的几点思考

商标异议制度是保障商标所有权人合法利益的一项重要制度。随着人们商标意识的日益强化，对商标异议制度也投来越来越多的关注。商标法第三次修改工作正在紧张的统筹之中，本文拟通过对现有异议制度的分析，引出几点不得不为的思考，以期于商标法的第三次修改提出自己的看法。