在实现担保物权程序中,确定适格的当事人是重要的前提条件。《民法典》第388条对于担保合同的范围作了区别以往的定义,使得“其他具有担保功能的合同”获得法律的认可。但是,诉讼法中对于担保物权程序的申请主体的规定尚未与《民法典》...在实现担保物权程序中,确定适格的当事人是重要的前提条件。《民法典》第388条对于担保合同的范围作了区别以往的定义,使得“其他具有担保功能的合同”获得法律的认可。但是,诉讼法中对于担保物权程序的申请主体的规定尚未与《民法典》相适应。申请实现担保物权程序的申请人范围应予以拓宽,涵盖新型担保物权人,从而达到在实现担保物权案件中程序主体与实体法规定的衔接。In the procedure of realizing a security interest, the identification of qualified parties is an important prerequisite. Article 388 of the “Civil Code” defines the scope of a guarantee contract differently from the previous one, so that “other contracts with security functions” are recognized by law. However, the provisions of the Procedural Law on the subject of application for security interest proceedings have not yet been adapted to the Civil Code. The scope of applicants applying for the realization of a security interest should be broadened to cover a new type of security interest holder, so as to achieve the convergence between the subject of the procedure and the provisions of the substantive law in the case of realization of a security interest.展开更多
文摘在实现担保物权程序中,确定适格的当事人是重要的前提条件。《民法典》第388条对于担保合同的范围作了区别以往的定义,使得“其他具有担保功能的合同”获得法律的认可。但是,诉讼法中对于担保物权程序的申请主体的规定尚未与《民法典》相适应。申请实现担保物权程序的申请人范围应予以拓宽,涵盖新型担保物权人,从而达到在实现担保物权案件中程序主体与实体法规定的衔接。In the procedure of realizing a security interest, the identification of qualified parties is an important prerequisite. Article 388 of the “Civil Code” defines the scope of a guarantee contract differently from the previous one, so that “other contracts with security functions” are recognized by law. However, the provisions of the Procedural Law on the subject of application for security interest proceedings have not yet been adapted to the Civil Code. The scope of applicants applying for the realization of a security interest should be broadened to cover a new type of security interest holder, so as to achieve the convergence between the subject of the procedure and the provisions of the substantive law in the case of realization of a security interest.
