目的探讨腹腔镜保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术的安全性以及围术期加速康复外科(enhanced recovery after surgery,ERAS)实施的策略和方法。方法回顾性收集2018年6月至2020年12月收治的38例胰体尾良性病变和低度恶性肿瘤行腹腔镜胰体尾切除术...目的探讨腹腔镜保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术的安全性以及围术期加速康复外科(enhanced recovery after surgery,ERAS)实施的策略和方法。方法回顾性收集2018年6月至2020年12月收治的38例胰体尾良性病变和低度恶性肿瘤行腹腔镜胰体尾切除术患者的临床资料,其中保脾组23例(实施Kimura法20例,Warshaw法3例),切脾组15例;围术期均实施ERAS措施,并分析患者术前影像学资料、手术时间、失血量、具体术式、ERAS实施方法、术后腹腔引流管拔除时间、术后住院时间、术后并发症和随访资料。结果保脾组和切脾组在肿瘤大小、手术时间、术中失血量、术后腹腔引流管拔除时间、术后住院时间及术后严重并发症方面,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。全组中位引流管拔除时间为6(5~7)d,保脾组为7(4~7)d,切脾组为6(5~7)d;无死亡病例。随访时间3~18个月,无肿瘤复发转移。结论胰体尾良性和低度恶性肿瘤实施腹腔镜保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术安全可行,围术期可按照ERAS策略实施。展开更多
Objectives:This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of slow deep breathing relaxation exercise(SDBRE)in reducing patients’pain levels during chest tube removal(CTR)post coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG)surg...Objectives:This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of slow deep breathing relaxation exercise(SDBRE)in reducing patients’pain levels during chest tube removal(CTR)post coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG)surgery.Methods:In 2019,fifty post-CABG patients were conveniently selected from a cardiac intensive care unit in Jordan’s major referral heart institute.The patients were randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group.A total of 25 patients were assigned into the experimental group who received slow deep breathing relaxation Exercise(SDBRE)alongside the conventional care before CTR.The remaining 25 patients constituted the control group(50%)that had CTR following conventional care.The Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)was used to measure the participants’pain levels during three phases:before CTR(Time 1),5-min post CTR(Time 2),and 15-min post CTR(Time 2)to compare the intervention effect between the two groups.Results:The data analysis findings for the control and intervention group of patients showed that there was a statistically significant decline in their pain level across time for both groups(H¼32.71,P<0.01;H=47.23,P<0.01)respectively.The intervention group had significantly lower pain levels than the control group at Time 2(3.50[1.20,5.30]vs.7.90[7.00,9.00],P<0.01)and Time 3(0.00[0.00,1.30]vs.3.60[2.40,4.10]P<0.01).Conclusions:Using SDBRE during CTR is an effective technique for reducing pain which can minimize the need for analgesics and their associated adverse effects.展开更多
文摘目的探讨腹腔镜保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术的安全性以及围术期加速康复外科(enhanced recovery after surgery,ERAS)实施的策略和方法。方法回顾性收集2018年6月至2020年12月收治的38例胰体尾良性病变和低度恶性肿瘤行腹腔镜胰体尾切除术患者的临床资料,其中保脾组23例(实施Kimura法20例,Warshaw法3例),切脾组15例;围术期均实施ERAS措施,并分析患者术前影像学资料、手术时间、失血量、具体术式、ERAS实施方法、术后腹腔引流管拔除时间、术后住院时间、术后并发症和随访资料。结果保脾组和切脾组在肿瘤大小、手术时间、术中失血量、术后腹腔引流管拔除时间、术后住院时间及术后严重并发症方面,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。全组中位引流管拔除时间为6(5~7)d,保脾组为7(4~7)d,切脾组为6(5~7)d;无死亡病例。随访时间3~18个月,无肿瘤复发转移。结论胰体尾良性和低度恶性肿瘤实施腹腔镜保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术安全可行,围术期可按照ERAS策略实施。
文摘Objectives:This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of slow deep breathing relaxation exercise(SDBRE)in reducing patients’pain levels during chest tube removal(CTR)post coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG)surgery.Methods:In 2019,fifty post-CABG patients were conveniently selected from a cardiac intensive care unit in Jordan’s major referral heart institute.The patients were randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group.A total of 25 patients were assigned into the experimental group who received slow deep breathing relaxation Exercise(SDBRE)alongside the conventional care before CTR.The remaining 25 patients constituted the control group(50%)that had CTR following conventional care.The Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)was used to measure the participants’pain levels during three phases:before CTR(Time 1),5-min post CTR(Time 2),and 15-min post CTR(Time 2)to compare the intervention effect between the two groups.Results:The data analysis findings for the control and intervention group of patients showed that there was a statistically significant decline in their pain level across time for both groups(H¼32.71,P<0.01;H=47.23,P<0.01)respectively.The intervention group had significantly lower pain levels than the control group at Time 2(3.50[1.20,5.30]vs.7.90[7.00,9.00],P<0.01)and Time 3(0.00[0.00,1.30]vs.3.60[2.40,4.10]P<0.01).Conclusions:Using SDBRE during CTR is an effective technique for reducing pain which can minimize the need for analgesics and their associated adverse effects.
