Accurate observation of clouds is challenging because of the high variability and complexity of cloud types and occurrences.By using the long-term cloud data collected during the ARM program at the Southern Great Plai...Accurate observation of clouds is challenging because of the high variability and complexity of cloud types and occurrences.By using the long-term cloud data collected during the ARM program at the Southern Great Plains central facility during 2001-2010,the consistencies and differences in the macrophysical properties of clouds between radiosonde and ground-based active remote sensing are quantitatively evaluated according to six cloud types：low;mid-low（ML）;high-midlow;mid;high-mid（HM）;and high.A similar variability trend is exhibited by the radiosonde and surface observations for the cloud fractions of the six cloud types.However,the magnitudes of the differences between the two methods are different among the six cloud types,with the largest difference seen in the high clouds.The distribution of the cloud-base height of the ML,mid,and HM clouds agrees in both methods,whereas large differences are seen in the cloud-top height for the ML and high clouds.The cloud thickness variations generally agree between the two datasets for the six cloud types.展开更多
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China[grant numbers 41275039,61327810 and91337214]
文摘Accurate observation of clouds is challenging because of the high variability and complexity of cloud types and occurrences.By using the long-term cloud data collected during the ARM program at the Southern Great Plains central facility during 2001-2010,the consistencies and differences in the macrophysical properties of clouds between radiosonde and ground-based active remote sensing are quantitatively evaluated according to six cloud types：low;mid-low（ML）;high-midlow;mid;high-mid（HM）;and high.A similar variability trend is exhibited by the radiosonde and surface observations for the cloud fractions of the six cloud types.However,the magnitudes of the differences between the two methods are different among the six cloud types,with the largest difference seen in the high clouds.The distribution of the cloud-base height of the ML,mid,and HM clouds agrees in both methods,whereas large differences are seen in the cloud-top height for the ML and high clouds.The cloud thickness variations generally agree between the two datasets for the six cloud types.
