推拿整脊治疗椎动脉型颈椎病研究进展

中医整脊法用于对椎动脉型颈椎病进行治疗有较长的历史以及较高的疗效。本文主要分析和总结使用整脊手法治疗椎动脉型颈椎病,从而理清现今椎动脉型颈椎病的主要治疗方式,相比单一疗法而言,综合疗法的优势更加明显。

推拿、整脊、针刺腰突穴治疗腰椎间盘突出症148例疗效分析

目的:观察腰椎间盘突出症(以下简称腰突症)采用推拿疗法和推拿、整脊加针刺腰突穴疗法的疗效比较。方法:将148例腰椎间盘突出症患者随机分为两组,采用推拿、整脊加针刺腰突穴治疗80例和单纯采用推拿疗法68例,均两个疗程。结果:采用推拿、整脊加针刺腰突穴疗法的治疗组和采用推拿疗法的对照组总有效率分别为94%、82.5%,治愈率分别为70%、51.5%。结论:采用推拿、整脊、针刺腰突穴疗法治疗腰突症疗效明显,优于采用单纯推拿疗法疗效。

整脊推拿为主治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效观察

目的:观察整脊推拿为主、配合牵引治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。方法:将72例急性腰椎间盘突出症的患者随机分为治疗组和观察组。其中治疗组36例,对照组36例。治疗组采用整脊推拿为主、配合牵引疗法;对照组采用常规药物及牵引治疗。运用日本骨科学会下腰痛评分法(JOA)进行临床疗效的评估,并比较2种治疗方法的临床效果。结果:治疗组平均上升(15.80±2.70)分,对照组平均上升(13.25±3.39)分。按分级疗效评定标准优良率治疗组为94.4%,对照组为76.7%(P<0.05)。结论:整脊推拿为主、配合牵引治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效确切,起效快,疗程短,操作简便、安全。

整脊平衡推拿术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床观察

目的 介绍整脊平衡推拿术,并观察本术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床效果。方法 以整脊平衡推拿术治疗116例患者作为观察组,同时对87例患者施以传统推拿法治疗作为对照组,对两组治疗结果进行Ridit分析。结果 整脊平衡推拿术疗效明显优于传统推拿术(U=3.619),且平均治愈时限明显短于传统推拿法(U=2.794)。结论 在整脊平衡推拿术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的理论依据和作用机理中,强调脊柱正中线的“重心线”作用,认为调整脊柱两侧的力学平衡是治疗腰椎间盘突出症的关键所在。

中西医结合治疗慢性咽喉炎的疗效观察

探讨观察中西医结合治疗慢性咽喉炎的疗效,并与单纯西药治疗效果相比较.方法:随机将96例门诊病人分为两组,实验治疗组48例,采用中医整脊推拿及中药汤剂辅助西药维生素治疗.对照治疗组48例,运用单纯西药治疗.结果:两组病人在病情疗效上有明显差别,经统计学处理(P﹤0.05)具有可比性.结论:中西医结合治疗慢性咽喉炎有较好的推广意义.

Clinical efficacy observation of spine subtle adjusting manipulation for postpartum low back pain

Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of spine subtle adjusting manipulation for postpartum low back pain(PLBP).Methods A total of 76 patients with PLBP were randomized into a control group and a treatment group,with 38 cases in each group.The control group was treated with core muscle strengthening exercises,and the treatment group was treated with spine subtle adjusting manipulation.After 3 weeks of treatment,the clinical efficacy was observed,and the visual analog scale(VAS)score and Oswestry disability index(ODI),and the changes of lumbar Cobb angle and pelvic rotation were compared between the two groups.Results The total effective rate of the treatment group was 92.1%,and that of the control group was 78.9%.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).After treatment,the VAS score and ODI in both groups decreased,and the intra-group differences were all statistically significant(P<0.05).There were no intra-group statistical differences in the lumbar Cobb angle or pelvic rotation in the two groups(P>0.05).After treatment,there were no statistical differences in the lumbar Cobb angle or pelvic rotation between the two groups(P>0.05);the VAS score and ODI in the treatment group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Spine subtle adjusting manipulation can effectively relieve the pain for patients with PLBP,and improve their daily activity function.