Based on amount of field investigation and laboratory analysis, this paper emphasized on the establishment of soil improvement benefit evaluation models. It is pointed out that the benefit evaluation models can be sim...Based on amount of field investigation and laboratory analysis, this paper emphasized on the establishment of soil improvement benefit evaluation models. It is pointed out that the benefit evaluation models can be simulated by taking litter biomass, mean diameter of breast high (D), mean height (H) and (D 2H) as independent variables and taking comprehensive benefit evaluation index as dependent variable. The models vary with different independent variables and can be chosen to use according to actual situation.展开更多
目的探讨COMPASS-CAT风险评估模型下的护理干预策略预防脊髓损伤患者深静脉血栓(Deep Venous Thrombosis,DVT)的发生效果。方法2019年8月至2020年8月采用方便抽样法选取庆阳市人民医院脊髓损伤患者80例,应用随机数字表将患者分为观察组...目的探讨COMPASS-CAT风险评估模型下的护理干预策略预防脊髓损伤患者深静脉血栓(Deep Venous Thrombosis,DVT)的发生效果。方法2019年8月至2020年8月采用方便抽样法选取庆阳市人民医院脊髓损伤患者80例,应用随机数字表将患者分为观察组及对照组各40例。对照组行常规性护理干预,观察组基于COMPASS-CAT风险评估模型预测患者血栓发生风险并采取针对性干预措施。比较两组患者干预前后的血栓评估准确率、DVT发生率及患者满意率。结果观察组干预后血流指标水平较对照组显著下降,观察组血栓评估准确率、下肢肿胀疼痛率、DVT发生率低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。干预后,观察组世界卫生组织生存质量测定简表(World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF,WHOQOL-BREF)及各维度评分较对照组显著提高,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论COMPASS-CAT风险评估模型可提高脊髓损伤患者DVT评估准确率,从而有助于临床尽早采取有效的预防措施降低DVT发生,改善患者预后,提高患者的生活质量。展开更多
文摘Based on amount of field investigation and laboratory analysis, this paper emphasized on the establishment of soil improvement benefit evaluation models. It is pointed out that the benefit evaluation models can be simulated by taking litter biomass, mean diameter of breast high (D), mean height (H) and (D 2H) as independent variables and taking comprehensive benefit evaluation index as dependent variable. The models vary with different independent variables and can be chosen to use according to actual situation.
文摘目的探讨COMPASS-CAT风险评估模型下的护理干预策略预防脊髓损伤患者深静脉血栓(Deep Venous Thrombosis,DVT)的发生效果。方法2019年8月至2020年8月采用方便抽样法选取庆阳市人民医院脊髓损伤患者80例,应用随机数字表将患者分为观察组及对照组各40例。对照组行常规性护理干预,观察组基于COMPASS-CAT风险评估模型预测患者血栓发生风险并采取针对性干预措施。比较两组患者干预前后的血栓评估准确率、DVT发生率及患者满意率。结果观察组干预后血流指标水平较对照组显著下降,观察组血栓评估准确率、下肢肿胀疼痛率、DVT发生率低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。干预后,观察组世界卫生组织生存质量测定简表(World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF,WHOQOL-BREF)及各维度评分较对照组显著提高,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论COMPASS-CAT风险评估模型可提高脊髓损伤患者DVT评估准确率,从而有助于临床尽早采取有效的预防措施降低DVT发生,改善患者预后,提高患者的生活质量。