期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
基层法院审判委员会“放权”改革的过程研究——以对某法院法官的访谈为素材 被引量:15
1
作者 肖仕卫 《法制与社会发展》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第2期28-37,共10页
从过程的角度来看,基层法院审判委员会的“放权”是法院内部各层次行动者以最高法院推行的审判委员会改革为契机,在审判委员会自身功能逐渐弱化、其他替代性机制功能逐渐强大的条件下,以法院的组织利益、中间组织的部门利益以及法官的... 从过程的角度来看,基层法院审判委员会的“放权”是法院内部各层次行动者以最高法院推行的审判委员会改革为契机,在审判委员会自身功能逐渐弱化、其他替代性机制功能逐渐强大的条件下,以法院的组织利益、中间组织的部门利益以及法官的个人利益为中心进行公共选择的结果。这样一种公共选择的逻辑,最终使得审判委员会的“放权”被异化“放权”不但没有减弱反而加强了法院对法官的控制,法官的独立审判在很大程度上演变成了一种“咨询型”审判。 展开更多
关键词 审判委员会 放权过程 利益选择 异化
原文传递
China's Decision-making System from Centralization to Democracy
2
作者 周光辉 《China Economist》 2011年第6期18-28,共11页
Established during the long years of revolutionary struggle and the founding of the People's Republic of China (PRC), the Communist Party of China(CPC)-led decision-making system has a historical rationality. Bef... Established during the long years of revolutionary struggle and the founding of the People's Republic of China (PRC), the Communist Party of China(CPC)-led decision-making system has a historical rationality. Before China's reform and opening-up was implemented in 1978, the decision-making system highlighted centralization which led to disadvantages such as non-existent specialized division of functions, a low level of institutionalization, heavy reliance on experience, an enclosed decision-making mode and non-existent self-correction mechanisms. These disadvantages were institutional factors which ultimately caused the historic tragedy of " Cultural Revolution. "After the reform and opening-up, the decision-making structure, mode and mechanism were reformed in order to promote scientific, democratic and law-based decisions. History has shown that the reform has successfully overcome various challenges brought about by China's rapidly changing economy and society. From the perspective of political development, the reform has promoted several transitions: from individual controlled decision-making system to a more democratic decision-making process, from being empirical to scientifically-based, from highly centralized decision-making organizations to decentralized one, from an enclosed mode to an open mode, from passive to active participation in the decision-making process and from a non-institutionalized to an institutionalized system. Therefore, the CPC-led open decision-making model based on science and laws and participated by other parties has taken an initial shape. 展开更多
关键词 decision-making system centralized decision-making democratic decision-making scientific decision-making law-based decision-making
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部