While there is lots of empirical evidence showing that grammar consciousness raising tasks （GCRTs） have an edge over the traditional modes of grammar instruction, there is very little qualitative evidence reflecting...While there is lots of empirical evidence showing that grammar consciousness raising tasks （GCRTs） have an edge over the traditional modes of grammar instruction, there is very little qualitative evidence reflecting learners＇ perceptions of externally imposed educational changes including GCRTs. To extrapolate the previous findings and fill in this gap, this study aims to： （I） test the alleged superiority of GCRTs in grammar instruction and （2） explore learners＇ perceptions of learning grammar through GCRTs. To this end, this study used a mixed-method design including a quantitative and a qualitative dimension. The former dimension aimed at testing the superiority of GCRTs on a random sample of intermediate learners from Simin language school in Karaj, Iran through the robust Solomon-four-group design and the latter dimension aimed at collecting and analyzing qualitative interview data on learners＇ perceptions of GCRTs. The quantitative results clearly showed that learners being taught through GCRTs significantly outperformed those instructed through the traditional mode of grammar instruction and the qualitative analysis of learners＇ perspectives showed that the participants had a positive perception of GCRTs and this positive perception was rooted in GCRTs＇ potential to： （1） facilitate the internalization of grammar and （2） involve learners in discovery learning. The findings have clear implications for syllabus designers and practitioners.展开更多
This study investigates Chinese university EFL teachers' and students' beliefs about what determines the text quality of EFL writing via a mixed-method analysis of data collected by questionnaire, interview, a...This study investigates Chinese university EFL teachers' and students' beliefs about what determines the text quality of EFL writing via a mixed-method analysis of data collected by questionnaire, interview, and diagnostic and self-diagnostic feedback on students' essays. The results indicate that: First, both the teachers and students attached much importance to language, but the teachers put significantly more emphasis on organization and content whereas the students put significantly more emphasis on vocabulary;Second, the beliefs of students were heavily influenced by their conceptions of the purposes of EFL writing tasks and the assessment criteria adopted to mark their writing;Third, the disparity between teachers' and students' beliefs caused them to emphasize different aspects of an essay when giving feedback;Finally, students' beliefs had a negative impact on the development of effective writing strategies. Pedagogical implications are suggested.展开更多
文摘While there is lots of empirical evidence showing that grammar consciousness raising tasks （GCRTs） have an edge over the traditional modes of grammar instruction, there is very little qualitative evidence reflecting learners＇ perceptions of externally imposed educational changes including GCRTs. To extrapolate the previous findings and fill in this gap, this study aims to： （I） test the alleged superiority of GCRTs in grammar instruction and （2） explore learners＇ perceptions of learning grammar through GCRTs. To this end, this study used a mixed-method design including a quantitative and a qualitative dimension. The former dimension aimed at testing the superiority of GCRTs on a random sample of intermediate learners from Simin language school in Karaj, Iran through the robust Solomon-four-group design and the latter dimension aimed at collecting and analyzing qualitative interview data on learners＇ perceptions of GCRTs. The quantitative results clearly showed that learners being taught through GCRTs significantly outperformed those instructed through the traditional mode of grammar instruction and the qualitative analysis of learners＇ perspectives showed that the participants had a positive perception of GCRTs and this positive perception was rooted in GCRTs＇ potential to： （1） facilitate the internalization of grammar and （2） involve learners in discovery learning. The findings have clear implications for syllabus designers and practitioners.
基金funded by the Social Science Foundation of Beijing [Grant No.16YJC018]
文摘This study investigates Chinese university EFL teachers' and students' beliefs about what determines the text quality of EFL writing via a mixed-method analysis of data collected by questionnaire, interview, and diagnostic and self-diagnostic feedback on students' essays. The results indicate that: First, both the teachers and students attached much importance to language, but the teachers put significantly more emphasis on organization and content whereas the students put significantly more emphasis on vocabulary;Second, the beliefs of students were heavily influenced by their conceptions of the purposes of EFL writing tasks and the assessment criteria adopted to mark their writing;Third, the disparity between teachers' and students' beliefs caused them to emphasize different aspects of an essay when giving feedback;Finally, students' beliefs had a negative impact on the development of effective writing strategies. Pedagogical implications are suggested.
