“文化建设与文化体制改革”理论研讨会在郑召开

2002年12月18日,由中共河南省委宣传部、河南省社会科学界联合会、河南日报主办,河南省文学会承办的'学习十六大--文化建设与文化体制改革'理论研讨会在河南省文学院召开.来自全省理论界和文学界的领导、专家结合自己的实际工作,畅所欲言,纷纷谈了自己对此问题的理解和认识.

融合 配合 调和——关于文化建设科学发展的思考

科学发展是发展是硬道理的本质要求,文化建设科学发展是科学发展的内容。文化建设科学发展主要有三个方面:一是文化精神的融合发展;二是文化产业各门类的配合发展;三是文化体制的调和发展。

泡沫文化及其防治

"泡沫文化"现象主要表现在影视、学术、文学和网络等方面,对青少年和成人都产生很大的危害。"泡沫文化"产生的原因有社会、文化需求、文化体制等。可以从加强思想道德和文化体制建设以及发展文化事业来防止泡沫文化的产生。

试论泡沫文化的成因及其防治对策

“泡沫文化”现象主要表现在影视、学术、文学和网络等方面，对青少年和成人都产生了很大的危害，“泡沫文化”产生的原因有社会、人们文化需求、体制等方面，可以从加强思想道德和文化体制建设以及发展文化事业来防治泡沫文化的产生。

中国古代文化规制实践及启示

我国正处在步入改革深水区的新时期,摸索中国特色社会主义道路的同时,建设和完善中国特色社会主义文化,纠正现阶段由于文化自卑性所导致的文化入侵的不良影响,为诸多方面的改革做好文化环境的保障成为当前中国深化改革的重要任务之一。在这种情况下,行政机关通过文化规制对文化发展进行干预是建设中国特色社会主义文化体制的重要途径。在我国历史上,文化规制政策一直是不同社会条件下的执政机构的重要任务之一。本文主要通过对我国历史上的文化规制活动进行分析,为当代中国特色社会主义文化体制建设提供文化规制的新思路。

新时期图书馆员职业道德刍议

图书馆作为公共文化的重要社会设施,是国家软实力的基础。新时期图书馆职业道德建设是现代公共文化体制建设中的重要问题之一,既是社会发展的需要,也是图书馆自身发展的需要。这一建设的主要内容包括:敬岗爱业,树立全心全意为读者服务的思想。为此,要建立新的图书馆管理机制,提高图书馆工作人员专业素质。

Study on the Guarantee Mechanism for the Construction of Government Public Culture Service System

The design and study on the construction of government public culture service system have been commenced since 2010 in China, aiming at exploring the construction models of government public culture service system in central China, east China, west China, and urban and rural areas, and researching effective measures. As a result, the study of the guarantee mechanism for the construction of government public culture service system can be promoted. In this paper, the main contents of the construction of government public culture service system, the construction significance, and the construction＇s guarantee mechanism are studied and discussed emphatically.

On the inherent mechanism of emancipation of the mind

At present, emancipating the mind has changed from a significant movement of ideological and theoretical reform initiated at a special historical moment in human society to an inherent requirement and organic constituent of social development that has been regularized, universalized, routinized and normalized. It is the condensed embodiment of the tension and conflict between the determinate and the creative, the natural and the transcendental in the structure of human existence. Its dynamic and constraining mechanisms are specifically manifested as the tension and conflict between innovative and conservative ideas, open and closed ways of thinking, and modern and traditional cultural patterns. In the course of a new emancipation of our thinking, we should not only actively promote specific emancipation of the mind on every level and in every sphere, but also highlight the establishment of mechanisms and institutions for such emancipation, and especially the formation of a mechanism for cultural innovation. We must create an institutional culture that respects different ideas; establish a mindset that is open, tolerant, creative and cherishes difference; and cultivate a cultural model that respects individuality and innovation.