期刊文献+
共找到3篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
新辅助性治疗与辅助性治疗对直肠癌术后疗效的Meta分析 被引量:1
1
作者 曾祥 胡伟民 +1 位作者 王进 汪彬哲 《中华肿瘤防治杂志》 CAS 2011年第5期367-370,共4页
目的:通过Meta分析探讨新辅助性与辅助性治疗对术后直肠癌患者的疗效差异。方法:通过检索PubMed、Medline、中国期刊全文数据库和维普中文数据库,收集2000—2009国内外公开发表的有关新辅助性与辅助性放化疗治疗直肠癌术后患者的病... 目的:通过Meta分析探讨新辅助性与辅助性治疗对术后直肠癌患者的疗效差异。方法:通过检索PubMed、Medline、中国期刊全文数据库和维普中文数据库,收集2000—2009国内外公开发表的有关新辅助性与辅助性放化疗治疗直肠癌术后患者的病例对照研究及队列研究文献,剔除不符合要求的文献,应用Revman5.0软件进行一致性和数据合并分析,并使用倒置漏斗图评估发表偏倚。结果:纳入6篇文献;Meta分析结果显示,新辅助性治疗的术后10年生存率与辅助性治疗差异无统计学意义,P〉0.05,合并0R值为0.95,95%CI(0.82~1.11),术后局部复发率与辅助性治疗差异有统计学意义,P〈0.01,合并0R值为0.37,95%CI(0.29~0.48)。结论:与辅助性治疗比较,新辅助性治疗有助于降低直肠癌患者的术后局部复发率以及提高患者的生活质量。 展开更多
关键词 直肠肿瘤 新辅助性治疗 META分析
原文传递
肝动脉灌注化疗联合热疗治疗肝门部胆管癌的临床价值 被引量:13
2
作者 陈耀庭 姚和瑞 +4 位作者 孙宏亮 骆江红 江雄鹰 陈栋 许林锋 《中山大学学报(医学科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期539-544,共6页
[目的]初步评价肝动脉灌注化疗联合局部内生场热疗(热化疗)在肝门部胆管癌治疗的临床应用价值.[方法]对2003年10月至2013年6月期间39例接受介入治疗的肝门部胆管癌病人进行回顾性研究,其中热化疗组20例,于肝动脉置管,灌注吉西他滨后,... [目的]初步评价肝动脉灌注化疗联合局部内生场热疗(热化疗)在肝门部胆管癌治疗的临床应用价值.[方法]对2003年10月至2013年6月期间39例接受介入治疗的肝门部胆管癌病人进行回顾性研究,其中热化疗组20例,于肝动脉置管,灌注吉西他滨后,再行肝动脉持续灌注卡铂及肿瘤区域内生场热疗60 min,热化疗后连续肝动脉灌注5-Fu 3 d,第8天静脉应用吉西他滨1次.对照组19例,肝动脉置管及化疗方案同前,未行热疗.上述治疗每4周为1疗程.化疗期间观察化疗毒副反应、并发症及耐受性,随访期间的疗效评价以无肿瘤进展生存时间(PFS)和生存时间(OS)为主要参考指标,并对两组的生存数据进行生存评估.[结果]热化疗组共行107个疗程治疗,OS为7.2~85.8个月,中位OS为23.7个月,PFS为7.2~80.3个月,中位PFS为20.3个月.对照组共行100个疗程治疗,OS为6.0~22.3个月,中位OS为17.5个月,PFS为3.5~19.5个月,中位PFS为14.2个月.经Log-rank检验显示热化疗在延长患者OS和PFS与对照组的治疗有统计学差异(P<0.05).治疗期间两组均无严重的化疗毒副反应和并发症.[结论]肝动脉灌注化疗联合内生场热疗在治疗肝门部胆管癌具有安全、微创、耐受性良好的特点,有望成为一个新的辅助性治疗. 展开更多
关键词 胆管癌 肝门 化疗 肝动脉 热疗 内生场 治疗 辅助
下载PDF
Is adjuvant chemotherapy necessary for patients with ypT0–2N0 rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery?
3
作者 Zhao Lu Pu Cheng +2 位作者 Ming-Guang Zhang Xi-Shan Wang Zhao-Xu Zheng 《Gastroenterology Report》 SCIE EI 2018年第4期277-283,I0002,共8页
Background and objective:The benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(NCRT)and curative surgery remains controversial,particularly among those responding well to NCRT.... Background and objective:The benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(NCRT)and curative surgery remains controversial,particularly among those responding well to NCRT.This retrospective study aimed to clarify the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of the oncological outcomes of patients with ypT0–2N0 rectal cancer after NCRT and curative surgery.Methods:All patients with ypT0–2N0 rectal cancer after NCRT and curative resection between 2005 and 2014 were examined.The oncological outcomes between patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and those without any chemotherapy were compared.Results:The clinicopathological characteristics of 110 patients were reviewed in this study;one patient was excluded due to lack of follow-up.Of the 109 patients included,58(53.2%)underwent adjuvant chemotherapy(chemo group),whereas the remaining 51(46.8%)did not receive any chemotherapy(non-chemo group).After a median follow-up of 50 months,there were no significant differences in the 5-year overall survival(OS)or recurrence-free survival(RFS)rates between the groups(OS:92.1 vs 86.3%,P=0.375;RFS:80.9 vs 74.7%,P=0.534).Subgroup analysis also demonstrated no significant differences in 5-year OS and RFS rates between patients with ypT0N0 rectal cancer(P=0.712 and P=0.599,respectively)and those with ypT1–2N0 disease(P=0.255 and P=0.278,respectively).Conclusions:These results indicate that patients with ypT0–2N0 rectal cancer after NCRT followed by curative surgery may not derive significant benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.However,further prospective randomized trials,with larger sample sizes,are warranted to confirm this conclusion. 展开更多
关键词 Rectal cancer adjuvant chemotherapy neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy SURVIVAL
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部