期刊文献+
共找到3篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
基于FTA的扬州文物古建筑雷击易损性风险防御研究 被引量:2
1
作者 徐乐 史东东 +3 位作者 高攀亮 王成芳 樊余祥 王艳东 《科技通报》 2022年第1期118-122,共5页
基于文物古建筑的木质特性及其信息系统的脆弱性,雷击成为古建筑起火和信息系统损毁的重要原因,因此急需科学合理的雷击易损风险分析来进行有效防御。本文运用事故树(FTA)分析法,综合考虑扬州市文物古建筑因雷击引发易损事件的相关途径... 基于文物古建筑的木质特性及其信息系统的脆弱性,雷击成为古建筑起火和信息系统损毁的重要原因,因此急需科学合理的雷击易损风险分析来进行有效防御。本文运用事故树(FTA)分析法,综合考虑扬州市文物古建筑因雷击引发易损事件的相关途径、过程和规律,分析比较雷击易损事故树中最小割集、最小径集、基本事件的概率重要程度。研究表明:扬州地区古建筑雷击易损事故树确立了27个基本事件,其中屋檐脊角埋设金属构件、电源信号线路、木质结构、防雷装置年检维护和人员培训等7个基本事件在结构重要程度分析中最为重要,共计有256种可能导致古建筑雷击易损发生的路径和有效预防雷击损害发生的3条途径,最有效的防御手段是在防雷安全管理制度完备的基础上有针对性完善防雷措施,重点做好接闪器敷设、引下线增设、可靠等电位连接和浪涌保护器安装等工作。该研究为文物古建筑实施全面合理的防雷安全保护策略提供科学参考。 展开更多
关键词 事故树分析法(FTA) 古建筑 雷击 易损风险
下载PDF
中国沿海风暴潮灾害易损性风险区划研究 被引量:4
2
作者 殷克东 王冰 刘士彬 《统计与决策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第17期48-50,共3页
文章在界定风暴潮灾害风险的基础上,按照风暴潮灾害风险区划原则,选取风暴潮灾害易损性风险评价指标,采用层次聚类分析、熵值法及灰色关联分析方法,构建了我国沿海风暴潮灾害易损性风险区划,将我国沿海11省市划分为5个区,揭示了我国沿... 文章在界定风暴潮灾害风险的基础上,按照风暴潮灾害风险区划原则,选取风暴潮灾害易损性风险评价指标,采用层次聚类分析、熵值法及灰色关联分析方法,构建了我国沿海风暴潮灾害易损性风险区划,将我国沿海11省市划分为5个区,揭示了我国沿海承担风暴潮灾害易损性风险的地域差异性,为因地制宜地制定防灾减灾措施与规划提供了科学依据。 展开更多
关键词 区域分异理论 易损风险 层次聚类分析 熵值法 灰色关联分析
下载PDF
Hazard and population vulnerability analysis: a step towards landslide risk assessment 被引量:2
3
作者 Franny G.MURILLO-GARCíA Mauro ROSSI +2 位作者 Francesca ARDIZZONE Federica FIORUCCI Irasema ALCáNTARA-AYALA 《Journal of Mountain Science》 SCIE CSCD 2017年第7期1241-1261,共21页
In this paper, an attempt to analyse landslide hazard and vulnerability in the municipality of Pahuatlfin, Puebla, Mexico, is presented. In order to estimate landslide hazard, the susceptibility, magnitude (area-velo... In this paper, an attempt to analyse landslide hazard and vulnerability in the municipality of Pahuatlfin, Puebla, Mexico, is presented. In order to estimate landslide hazard, the susceptibility, magnitude (area-velocity ratio) and landslide frequency of the area of interest were produced based on information derived from a geomorphological landslide inventory; the latter was generated by using very high resolution satellite stereo pairs along with information derived from other sources (Google Earth, aerial photographs and historical information). Estimations of landslide susceptibility were determined by combining four statistical techniques: (i) logistic regression, (ii) quadratic discriminant analysis, (iii) linear discriminant analysis, and (iv) neuronal networks. A Digital Elevation Model (DEM) of lo m spatial resolution was used to extract the slope angle, aspect, curvature, elevation and relief. These factors, in addition to land cover, lithology anddistance to faults, were used as explanatory variables for the susceptibility models. Additionally, a Poisson model was used to estimate landslide temporal frequency, at the same time as landslide magnitude was obtained by using the relationship between landslide area and the velocity of movements. Then, due to the complexity of evaluating it, vulnerability of population was analysed by applying the Spatial Approach to Vulnerability Assessment (SAVE) model which considered levels of exposure, sensitivity and lack of resilience. Results were expressed on maps on which different spatial patterns of levels of landslide hazard and vulnerability were found for the inhabited areas. It is noteworthy that the lack of optimal methodologies to estimate and quantify vulnerability is more notorious than that of hazard assessments. Consequently, levels of uncertainty linked to landslide risk assessment remain a challenge to be addressed. 展开更多
关键词 LANDSLIDES SUSCEPTIBILITY HazardVulnerability RISK
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部