期刊文献+
共找到3篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
施氮和木薯间作对成熟期花生根际土壤细菌群落结构的影响 被引量:5
1
作者 林洪鑫 袁展汽 +3 位作者 肖运萍 汪瑞清 吕丰娟 张志华 《中国油料作物学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第5期723-733,共11页
为明确相同施肥量条件下木薯-花生间作与花生单作的成熟期根际土壤细菌群落特征差异,以木薯品种华南205和花生品种粤油200为试验材料,设计2个施氮水平(施氮、不施氮)和3种种植模式(木薯单作、花生单作、木薯间作3行花生),采用高通量测... 为明确相同施肥量条件下木薯-花生间作与花生单作的成熟期根际土壤细菌群落特征差异,以木薯品种华南205和花生品种粤油200为试验材料,设计2个施氮水平(施氮、不施氮)和3种种植模式(木薯单作、花生单作、木薯间作3行花生),采用高通量测序技术,研究了施氮和木薯间作对成熟期花生根际土壤细菌群落结构的影响。结果表明,在相同施肥量条件下,木薯间作花生模式的土地当量比大于1,表现出间作优势,土地利用率提高49%~60%。成熟期花生根际土壤细菌4个优势类群依次为Chloroflexi、Proteobacteria、Actinobacteria和Acidobacteria,合计比例84.42%~84.59%。花生根际土壤细菌的属数量共477个。施氮和木薯间作对花生根际土壤细菌的α多样性无显著影响。木薯间作显著降低了Proteobacteria的相对丰度,降幅18.12%。在相对丰度排名前30的菌属中,不同处理组合间TK10和Roseiflexus的差异达显著水平;施氮显著降低了菌属Candidatus_Solibacter、Acidimicrobiales和Amycolatopsis的相对丰度,降幅分别为41.18%、33.11%和71.98%。冗余分析表明,有效磷、pH显著影响细菌花生根际土壤属水平群落组成。本研究结果为明确间作体系中花生根际微生态环境提供理论依据。 展开更多
关键词 木薯-花生间作 施氮 根际土壤 细菌 群落结构
下载PDF
不同木薯/花生模式下的产量表现及其经济产出研究 被引量:18
2
作者 刘子凡 黄洁 +1 位作者 魏云霞 孙鸿锐 《热带作物学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第1期65-69,共5页
研究了4种木薯株行距配置0.8 m×0.8 m(M_1)、0.6 m×1.0 m(M_2)、0.8 m×(1.0 m+0.6 m)(M_3)、0.6 m×(1.0 m+0.8 m)(M4),木薯单作与相应木薯/花生体系的产量表现和经济产出的影响。结果表明:4种间作处理的土地当量比(... 研究了4种木薯株行距配置0.8 m×0.8 m(M_1)、0.6 m×1.0 m(M_2)、0.8 m×(1.0 m+0.6 m)(M_3)、0.6 m×(1.0 m+0.8 m)(M4),木薯单作与相应木薯/花生体系的产量表现和经济产出的影响。结果表明:4种间作处理的土地当量比(LER)和产值当量(VOE)均大于1,木薯实际产量亏损(AYLc)均大于0,木薯偏土地当量比(PLER-C)均高于木薯在间作和单作中所占的土地面积之比,即4种间作模式均能提高土地利用率,且对木薯来说均具有间作优势;M3间作处理中花生相对于木薯的竞争力(Apc)和花生实际产量亏损(AYLp)大于0,而经济产出则比M3单作木薯高出了237元/667 m2,总的实际产量亏损(AYL)为1.07,在4种间作处理中数值最大。故木薯/花生间作体系中M3木薯株行距配置的间作产量优势和经济效益优势最佳。 展开更多
关键词 株行距 木薯-花生间作体系 产量 经济效应
下载PDF
Effects of Different Intercropping Modes on Growth, Yields and Economic Benefit of Cassava and Peanut in Symbiotic Period 被引量:2
3
作者 林洪鑫 袁展汽 +4 位作者 刘仁根 肖运萍 汪瑞清 吕丰娟 王子君 《Agricultural Science & Technology》 CAS 2016年第9期2017-2021,2026,共6页
[Objective] This study was conducted to investigate effects of different intercropping modes on growth, yields and economic benefit of cassava and peanut in symbiotic period. [Method] With sole cropping of cassava (M... [Objective] This study was conducted to investigate effects of different intercropping modes on growth, yields and economic benefit of cassava and peanut in symbiotic period. [Method] With sole cropping of cassava (M1) and sole cropping of peanut (M2) as control groups, effects of intercropping of cassava with 1 row, 2 rows and 3 rows of peanut (M3, M4 and M5)on crop growth, yields and economic benefit were studied. [Result] Intercropping affected both growth and yields of cassava and peanut. Growth competition existed between cassava and peanut, and plant heights of cassava and peanut changed similarly. In late stages of intercropping, treatments M1, M2 and M5 showed higher plant heights under no nitrogen application, while treatment M3 and M4 exhibited higher plant heights under nitrogen application; intercropping improved leaf temperature, but no obvious law could be observed among different intercropping treatments; and intercropping improved total dry matter amount, which was the highest in M5 in root expanding stage and on the 30th day of the expanding stage, and the highest in M4 on the 60th day of the expanding stage. Intercropping reduced the yield of single plant, but improved the economic benefit of red upland soil; and under no nitrogen application and nitrogen application, cassava yields decreased by 25.35% and 14.55%, respectively, peanut yields decreased by 28.76% and 52.60%, respectively, while economic benefit increased by 72.90% and 56.82%, respectively. [Conclusion] Compared with sole cropping, interplanting cassava with 1 row, 2 rows or 3 rows of peanut could all improve economic benefit, and the economic benefit increased with number of rows of interplanted peanut increasing. 展开更多
关键词 CASSAVA PEANUT INTERCROPPING Symbiotic period Growth and development
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部