目的:观察快速康复外科(ERAS)理念指导下围手术期护理干预措施对机器人辅助全膝关节置换术患者的临床应用及效果评价。方法:选取新疆医科大学第六附属医院2023年8月至2024年4月在腰硬联合麻醉下行单侧机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的患者75...目的:观察快速康复外科(ERAS)理念指导下围手术期护理干预措施对机器人辅助全膝关节置换术患者的临床应用及效果评价。方法:选取新疆医科大学第六附属医院2023年8月至2024年4月在腰硬联合麻醉下行单侧机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的患者75例,分为对照组36例和观察组39例。对照组采用常规围手术期护理干预措施,观察组采用ERAS理念指导下围手术期护理干预措施。比较两组围手术期指标(术后首次下床活动时间、尿管拔除时间)、术后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、美国特种外科医院(HSS)评分、美国膝关节协会(KSS)评分、膝关节主动活动度(ROM)、护理满意度及住院时间。结果:与对照组相比,采取ERAS理念指导下围手术期护理干预措施后,观察组术后首次下床活动时间为(23.06 ± 1.17)小时,尿管拔除时间为(6.82 ± 0.76)小时,均短于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P Objective: To observe the clinical application and effect evaluation of perioperative nursing interventions guided by the concept of rapid recovery surgery (ERAS) on patients undergoing robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Methods: A total of 75 patients undergoing unilateral robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia from August 2023 to April 2024 in the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University were enrolled, and they were divided into control group (36 cases) and observation group (39 cases). The control group was treated with conventional perioperative nursing interventions, and the observation group was guided by ERAS concept. The perioperative indexes (time to first get out of bed after surgery, time to urethral catheter removal), postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, American Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, American Knee Association (KSS) score, knee active range of motion (ROM), nursing satisfaction and hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Results: Compared with the control group, the time of first postoperative activity and the time of urethral catheter removal in the observation group were (23.06 ± 1.17) hours, and the time of urethral catheter removal was (6.82 ± 0.76) hours, which were shorter than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05), and the VAS score of the observation group was (4.46 ± 0.79) on the first day after operation, and (2.21 ± 0.66) on the seventh day after operation. The HSS score was (59.31 ± 2.36) on the seventh day and (81.38 ± 2.16) on the first month after operation. The KSS score in the first month after surgery was (78.38 ± 2.20). The ROM in the first month after surgery was (110.00±2.56);The nursing satisfaction score at discharge was (95.79 ± 0.81). The average length of hospital stay was (11.15 ± 1.25) days, which was better than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Perioperative nursing measures under the guidance of ERAS concept have good clinical application value in accelerating the knee rehabilitation process of patients undergoing robotic total knee arthroplasty.展开更多
目的分析股神经联合坐骨神经阻滞与局部浸润对膝关节单髁置换术(unicompartmental knee arthroplasty,UKA)后疼痛、膝关节活动度及预后康复的影响.方法选取2021年9月至2023年5月承德医学院附属医院行UKA治疗的90例患者,随机分为三组.A...目的分析股神经联合坐骨神经阻滞与局部浸润对膝关节单髁置换术(unicompartmental knee arthroplasty,UKA)后疼痛、膝关节活动度及预后康复的影响.方法选取2021年9月至2023年5月承德医学院附属医院行UKA治疗的90例患者,随机分为三组.A组30例,女20例,男10例;年龄51~76岁,平均(63.00±5.08)岁.B组30例,女22例,男8例;年龄50~75岁,平均(65.20±6.38)岁.C组30例,女23例,男7例;年龄53~76岁,平均(65.00±6.31)岁.A、B组手术复合麻醉前在超声引导下分别注射不同药物行单次股神经联合坐骨神经阻滞镇痛治疗,C组在术中切口缝合前对膝关节周围局部注射“鸡尾酒”镇痛治疗.记录三组患者UKA术后静息及运动状态下的疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、膝关节活动度、美国特种外科医院(the hospital for special surgery,HSS)膝关节评分、术后起立行走测试(timed up and go test,TUG)等相关数据,通过数据分析比较三种镇痛方式的临床效果.结果三组患者均随访3个月.A、B组术后4h、8h、12h的静息及运动状态下VAS评分、术后1 d膝关节活动度等情况均优于C组(P<0.05);术后24h的静息VAS评分A组和B组<C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后24h的运动VAS评分B组<A组和C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后1d、3d、1个月和3个月的膝关节活动度、术后3dTUG、术后1个月HSS评分比较,三组差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论单次股神经联合坐骨神经阻滞相较于局部浸润镇痛,能够更好地缓解UKA后早期疼痛,且在神经阻滞药物中加入地塞米松可使镇痛作用持续时间进一步延长,其镇痛效果更为显著,值得临床推广应用.展开更多
文摘目的:观察快速康复外科(ERAS)理念指导下围手术期护理干预措施对机器人辅助全膝关节置换术患者的临床应用及效果评价。方法:选取新疆医科大学第六附属医院2023年8月至2024年4月在腰硬联合麻醉下行单侧机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的患者75例,分为对照组36例和观察组39例。对照组采用常规围手术期护理干预措施,观察组采用ERAS理念指导下围手术期护理干预措施。比较两组围手术期指标(术后首次下床活动时间、尿管拔除时间)、术后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、美国特种外科医院(HSS)评分、美国膝关节协会(KSS)评分、膝关节主动活动度(ROM)、护理满意度及住院时间。结果:与对照组相比,采取ERAS理念指导下围手术期护理干预措施后,观察组术后首次下床活动时间为(23.06 ± 1.17)小时,尿管拔除时间为(6.82 ± 0.76)小时,均短于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P Objective: To observe the clinical application and effect evaluation of perioperative nursing interventions guided by the concept of rapid recovery surgery (ERAS) on patients undergoing robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Methods: A total of 75 patients undergoing unilateral robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia from August 2023 to April 2024 in the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University were enrolled, and they were divided into control group (36 cases) and observation group (39 cases). The control group was treated with conventional perioperative nursing interventions, and the observation group was guided by ERAS concept. The perioperative indexes (time to first get out of bed after surgery, time to urethral catheter removal), postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, American Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, American Knee Association (KSS) score, knee active range of motion (ROM), nursing satisfaction and hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Results: Compared with the control group, the time of first postoperative activity and the time of urethral catheter removal in the observation group were (23.06 ± 1.17) hours, and the time of urethral catheter removal was (6.82 ± 0.76) hours, which were shorter than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05), and the VAS score of the observation group was (4.46 ± 0.79) on the first day after operation, and (2.21 ± 0.66) on the seventh day after operation. The HSS score was (59.31 ± 2.36) on the seventh day and (81.38 ± 2.16) on the first month after operation. The KSS score in the first month after surgery was (78.38 ± 2.20). The ROM in the first month after surgery was (110.00±2.56);The nursing satisfaction score at discharge was (95.79 ± 0.81). The average length of hospital stay was (11.15 ± 1.25) days, which was better than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Perioperative nursing measures under the guidance of ERAS concept have good clinical application value in accelerating the knee rehabilitation process of patients undergoing robotic total knee arthroplasty.
文摘目的分析股神经联合坐骨神经阻滞与局部浸润对膝关节单髁置换术(unicompartmental knee arthroplasty,UKA)后疼痛、膝关节活动度及预后康复的影响.方法选取2021年9月至2023年5月承德医学院附属医院行UKA治疗的90例患者,随机分为三组.A组30例,女20例,男10例;年龄51~76岁,平均(63.00±5.08)岁.B组30例,女22例,男8例;年龄50~75岁,平均(65.20±6.38)岁.C组30例,女23例,男7例;年龄53~76岁,平均(65.00±6.31)岁.A、B组手术复合麻醉前在超声引导下分别注射不同药物行单次股神经联合坐骨神经阻滞镇痛治疗,C组在术中切口缝合前对膝关节周围局部注射“鸡尾酒”镇痛治疗.记录三组患者UKA术后静息及运动状态下的疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、膝关节活动度、美国特种外科医院(the hospital for special surgery,HSS)膝关节评分、术后起立行走测试(timed up and go test,TUG)等相关数据,通过数据分析比较三种镇痛方式的临床效果.结果三组患者均随访3个月.A、B组术后4h、8h、12h的静息及运动状态下VAS评分、术后1 d膝关节活动度等情况均优于C组(P<0.05);术后24h的静息VAS评分A组和B组<C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后24h的运动VAS评分B组<A组和C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后1d、3d、1个月和3个月的膝关节活动度、术后3dTUG、术后1个月HSS评分比较,三组差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论单次股神经联合坐骨神经阻滞相较于局部浸润镇痛,能够更好地缓解UKA后早期疼痛,且在神经阻滞药物中加入地塞米松可使镇痛作用持续时间进一步延长,其镇痛效果更为显著,值得临床推广应用.
