期刊文献+
共找到5篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
凌汛期三门峡、小浪底水库联合运用后下游来水分析
1
作者 孟祥文 李福生 《水利建设与管理》 2005年第5期58-59,61,共3页
气温、流量和河道边界条件是影响黄河下游凌汛的三大因素.其中气温不能人为改变,河道边界条件也不宜大规模改变,利用上游已建水库,合理调整河道流量,是有效的防凌措施之一.借鉴三门峡水库防凌运用经验,来合理利用小浪底水库的防凌库容,... 气温、流量和河道边界条件是影响黄河下游凌汛的三大因素.其中气温不能人为改变,河道边界条件也不宜大规模改变,利用上游已建水库,合理调整河道流量,是有效的防凌措施之一.借鉴三门峡水库防凌运用经验,来合理利用小浪底水库的防凌库容,与三门峡联合运用,控制下泄流量.分析表明:在正常调度情况下,三门峡和小浪底水库的35亿m3防凌库容是完全能够满足下游防凌要求的. 展开更多
关键词 黄河下游 防凌 流量 小浪底 联合运用 三门峡 凌汛期 来水分析 河道流量
下载PDF
龙羊峡水库来水分析
2
作者 靳少波 《青海电力》 1994年第1期50-54,共5页
龙羊峡水库来水分析青海省电力局中心调度所靳少波一、问题的提出龙羊峡水电站位居黄河上游水电站之首,以其库大(正常蓄水位2600米时库容为247亿立方米),坝高(最大坝高178米),装机容量大(4台32万千瓦)及水库调节... 龙羊峡水库来水分析青海省电力局中心调度所靳少波一、问题的提出龙羊峡水电站位居黄河上游水电站之首,以其库大(正常蓄水位2600米时库容为247亿立方米),坝高(最大坝高178米),装机容量大(4台32万千瓦)及水库调节性能好(调节库容193.6亿立方米... 展开更多
关键词 龙羊峡 来水分析 径流 库调度
下载PDF
关于灌区用水管理中几个问题的初步分析 被引量:1
3
作者 彭随劳 《地下水》 2002年第2期96-97,共2页
本文通过千河流域冯家山灌区来水、用水分析 ,揭示了用水管理中存在的问题 ,进一步指出了增加投资、改善设施和提高灌溉水利用率的对策 。
关键词 灌区 管理 分析 管理体制 来水分析
下载PDF
两河口水电站第一阶段蓄水方案比选研究 被引量:1
4
作者 伍远朋 武晓杰 《四川水力发电》 2022年第4期123-126,130,共5页
两河口水电站是雅砻江中上游龙头水库,水库蓄水深度约285 m,大坝为心墙土石坝。电站蓄水分为三个阶段四期蓄水,其中第一阶段蓄水深度约80 m。通过河道水文特性及径流来水分析、闸门挡水风险分析、生态供水要求、下闸后度汛要求、枢纽工... 两河口水电站是雅砻江中上游龙头水库,水库蓄水深度约285 m,大坝为心墙土石坝。电站蓄水分为三个阶段四期蓄水,其中第一阶段蓄水深度约80 m。通过河道水文特性及径流来水分析、闸门挡水风险分析、生态供水要求、下闸后度汛要求、枢纽工程施工形象面貌、封堵设计与施工、移民安置等进行综合比较分析,确定了第一阶段的蓄水方案,并达到了预期蓄水的目的。 展开更多
关键词 径流来水分析 闸门挡风险分析 初期位上升速率分析 方案
下载PDF
A comparison of two kinds of eastward-moving mesoscale vortices during the mei-yu period of 2010 被引量:22
5
作者 FU ShenMing YU Fei +1 位作者 WANG DongHai XIA RuDi 《Science China Earth Sciences》 SCIE EI CAS 2013年第2期282-300,共19页
During the mei-yu period,the east edge of the Tibetan Plateau and the Dabie Mountain are two main sources of eastward-moving mesoscale vortices along the mei-yu front(MYF).In this study,an eastward-moving southwest vo... During the mei-yu period,the east edge of the Tibetan Plateau and the Dabie Mountain are two main sources of eastward-moving mesoscale vortices along the mei-yu front(MYF).In this study,an eastward-moving southwest vortex(SWV) and an eastward-moving Dabie vortex(DBV) during the mei-yu period of 2010 have been investigated to clarify the main similarities and differences between them.The synoptic analyses reveal that the SWV and DBV were both located at the lower troposphere;however,the SWV developed in a "from top down" trend,whereas the DBV developed in an opposite way.There were obvious surface closed low centers corresponding to the DBV during its life span,whereas for the SWV,the closed low center only appeared at the mature stage.Cold and warm air intersected intensely after the formation of both the vortices,and the cold advection in the SWV case was stronger than that in the DBV case,whereas the warm advection in the DBV case was more intense than that in the SWV case.The Bay of Bengal and the South China Sea were main moisture sources for the SWV,whereas for the DBV,in addition to the above two moisture sources,the East China Sea was also an important moisture source.The vorticity budget indicates that the convergence was the most important common factor conducive to the formation,development,and maintenance of the SWV and DBV,whereas the conversion from the vertical vorticity to the horizontal one(tilting) was the most important common factor caused the dissipation of both of the vortices.The kinetic energy(KE) budget reveals that the KE generation by the rotational wind was the dominant factor for the enhancement of KE associated with the SWV,whereas for the DBV,the KE transport by the rotational wind was more important than the KE generation.The KE associated with the SWV and the DBV weakened with different mechanisms during the decaying stage.Furthermore,the characteristics of baroclinic and barotropic energy conversions during the life spans of both vortices indicate that the SWV and DBV both belong to the kind of subtropical mesoscale vortices. 展开更多
关键词 southwest vortex MEI-YU VORTICITY kinetic energy baroclinic energy conversion barotropic energy conversion
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部