By using some elementary inequalities, authors in this paper makes further improvement for estimating the heights of Bézier curve and rational Bézier curve. And the termination criterion for subdivision of t...By using some elementary inequalities, authors in this paper makes further improvement for estimating the heights of Bézier curve and rational Bézier curve. And the termination criterion for subdivision of the rational Bézier curve is also improved. The conclusion of the extreme value problem is thus further confirmed.展开更多
One of the most important problems of clustering is to define the number of classes. In fact, it is not easy to find an appropriate method to measure whether the cluster configuration is acceptable or not. In this pap...One of the most important problems of clustering is to define the number of classes. In fact, it is not easy to find an appropriate method to measure whether the cluster configuration is acceptable or not. In this paper we propose a possible and non-automatic solution considering different criteria of clustering and comparing their results. In this way robust structures of an analyzed dataset can be often caught （or established） and an optimal cluster configuration, which presents a meaningful association, may be defined. In particular, we also focus on the variables which may be used in cluster analysis. In fact, variables which contain little clustering information can cause misleading and not-robustness results. Therefore, three algorithms are employed in this study： K-means partitioning methods, Partitioning Around Medoids （PAM） and the Heuristic Identification of Noisy Variables （HINoV）. The results are compared with robust methods ones.展开更多
文摘By using some elementary inequalities, authors in this paper makes further improvement for estimating the heights of Bézier curve and rational Bézier curve. And the termination criterion for subdivision of the rational Bézier curve is also improved. The conclusion of the extreme value problem is thus further confirmed.
文摘One of the most important problems of clustering is to define the number of classes. In fact, it is not easy to find an appropriate method to measure whether the cluster configuration is acceptable or not. In this paper we propose a possible and non-automatic solution considering different criteria of clustering and comparing their results. In this way robust structures of an analyzed dataset can be often caught （or established） and an optimal cluster configuration, which presents a meaningful association, may be defined. In particular, we also focus on the variables which may be used in cluster analysis. In fact, variables which contain little clustering information can cause misleading and not-robustness results. Therefore, three algorithms are employed in this study： K-means partitioning methods, Partitioning Around Medoids （PAM） and the Heuristic Identification of Noisy Variables （HINoV）. The results are compared with robust methods ones.
