古文的注释和翻译需要非常认真仔细,否则,即使是很浅显的文句,有时也会注错或误译。如对《左传·襄公二十六年》中“所争,君子也,其何不知?”这样一句并不艰深的句子,笔者就见有如下两种截然不同的译文: A. 争论的双方都是有身分的...古文的注释和翻译需要非常认真仔细,否则,即使是很浅显的文句,有时也会注错或误译。如对《左传·襄公二十六年》中“所争,君子也,其何不知?”这样一句并不艰深的句子,笔者就见有如下两种截然不同的译文: A. 争论的双方都是有身分的人,这件事有什么搞不清楚的?(黎明等译《古文名段今译》,外语教学与研究出版社,1981)展开更多
AIM:To assess the validity of the Milan and University of California San Francisco(UCSF) criteria and examine the long-term outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation(OLT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HC...AIM:To assess the validity of the Milan and University of California San Francisco(UCSF) criteria and examine the long-term outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation(OLT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) in a single-center study.METHODS:This study is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data.Between 1998 and 2009,56 of 356 OLTs were performed in patients with HCC.Based on pathological examination of liver explants,patients were retrospectively categorized into 3 groups:Milan +(n = 34),Milan-/UCSF +(n = 7) and UCSF-(n = 14).RESULTS:Median follow-up period was 39.5(1-124) mo.The 5-year overall survival rates in the Milan +,Milan-/UCSF + and UCSF-groups were 87.7%,53.6% and 33.3%,respectively(P < 0.000).Within these groups,tumor recurrence was determined in 5.8%,14.3% and 40% of patients,respectively(P < 0.011).Additionally,the presence of microvascular invasion within the explanted liver had a negative effect on the 5-year disease free survival(74.7% vs 46.7%,P < 0.044).CONCLUSION:The Milan criteria are reliable in the selection of suitable candidates for OLT for the treatment of HCC.For cases of OLT involving living donors,the UCSF criteria may be applied.展开更多
文摘古文的注释和翻译需要非常认真仔细,否则,即使是很浅显的文句,有时也会注错或误译。如对《左传·襄公二十六年》中“所争,君子也,其何不知?”这样一句并不艰深的句子,笔者就见有如下两种截然不同的译文: A. 争论的双方都是有身分的人,这件事有什么搞不清楚的?(黎明等译《古文名段今译》,外语教学与研究出版社,1981)
文摘AIM:To assess the validity of the Milan and University of California San Francisco(UCSF) criteria and examine the long-term outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation(OLT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) in a single-center study.METHODS:This study is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data.Between 1998 and 2009,56 of 356 OLTs were performed in patients with HCC.Based on pathological examination of liver explants,patients were retrospectively categorized into 3 groups:Milan +(n = 34),Milan-/UCSF +(n = 7) and UCSF-(n = 14).RESULTS:Median follow-up period was 39.5(1-124) mo.The 5-year overall survival rates in the Milan +,Milan-/UCSF + and UCSF-groups were 87.7%,53.6% and 33.3%,respectively(P < 0.000).Within these groups,tumor recurrence was determined in 5.8%,14.3% and 40% of patients,respectively(P < 0.011).Additionally,the presence of microvascular invasion within the explanted liver had a negative effect on the 5-year disease free survival(74.7% vs 46.7%,P < 0.044).CONCLUSION:The Milan criteria are reliable in the selection of suitable candidates for OLT for the treatment of HCC.For cases of OLT involving living donors,the UCSF criteria may be applied.
