高质量发展方向指引下,为引导机构、学者等科研对象更加专注科学研究,创作、发表高质量科研成果,提出基于标志性论文的高校学科影响力评价方法。在完成Web of Science与Essential Science Indicators学科分类映射的基础上遴选高校学科...高质量发展方向指引下,为引导机构、学者等科研对象更加专注科学研究,创作、发表高质量科研成果,提出基于标志性论文的高校学科影响力评价方法。在完成Web of Science与Essential Science Indicators学科分类映射的基础上遴选高校学科标志性论文,按照被引频次将论文分级赋值。以农业科学为例进行实证分析,结果显示,基于标志性论文的评价方法更易褒奖注重发表高质量论文的高校;评价周期长短对评价结果的影响较为有限;将基于标志性论文的学科影响力评价结果与教育部第四轮学科评估结果进行对比分析,验证了基于标志性论文评价高校学科影响力方法的可靠性。展开更多
The "Pictorial" or "Iconic Turn" is a central issue in the contemporary theory of images and visual cultural studies. Should the theories concerning the "Iconic Turn" and formulated in the last 20 years by schol...The "Pictorial" or "Iconic Turn" is a central issue in the contemporary theory of images and visual cultural studies. Should the theories concerning the "Iconic Turn" and formulated in the last 20 years by scholars such as Gottfried Boehm, William Mitchell, Hans Belting be taken as critical theories of crisis? Is the currently experienced "turn towards images" (and their progressive rehabilitation after a long standing philosophical and theological rejection) a sign and symptom of some crisis of people's relation with images, language and, generally speaking, with the representation forms of reality? The main hypothesis of this essay envisages two sets of problems: first, the analysis of the relation between the possible idea of turning point and the concept of crisis; secondly, the thorough investigation of the relation connecting the iconic turn to the project of "critical iconology" or "critique of visual culture," as outlined by Hans Belting and William Mitchell. From the interpretation of the "Iconic Turn" as situation of crisis and aesthetic, anthropological, and epistemological transformation follows the need for the sciences of image to provide a "critical iconology" in order to be able to theoretically reformulate the ideological and political presuppositions of some dominant contemporary forms of visual representation.展开更多
文摘高质量发展方向指引下,为引导机构、学者等科研对象更加专注科学研究,创作、发表高质量科研成果,提出基于标志性论文的高校学科影响力评价方法。在完成Web of Science与Essential Science Indicators学科分类映射的基础上遴选高校学科标志性论文,按照被引频次将论文分级赋值。以农业科学为例进行实证分析,结果显示,基于标志性论文的评价方法更易褒奖注重发表高质量论文的高校;评价周期长短对评价结果的影响较为有限;将基于标志性论文的学科影响力评价结果与教育部第四轮学科评估结果进行对比分析,验证了基于标志性论文评价高校学科影响力方法的可靠性。
文摘The "Pictorial" or "Iconic Turn" is a central issue in the contemporary theory of images and visual cultural studies. Should the theories concerning the "Iconic Turn" and formulated in the last 20 years by scholars such as Gottfried Boehm, William Mitchell, Hans Belting be taken as critical theories of crisis? Is the currently experienced "turn towards images" (and their progressive rehabilitation after a long standing philosophical and theological rejection) a sign and symptom of some crisis of people's relation with images, language and, generally speaking, with the representation forms of reality? The main hypothesis of this essay envisages two sets of problems: first, the analysis of the relation between the possible idea of turning point and the concept of crisis; secondly, the thorough investigation of the relation connecting the iconic turn to the project of "critical iconology" or "critique of visual culture," as outlined by Hans Belting and William Mitchell. From the interpretation of the "Iconic Turn" as situation of crisis and aesthetic, anthropological, and epistemological transformation follows the need for the sciences of image to provide a "critical iconology" in order to be able to theoretically reformulate the ideological and political presuppositions of some dominant contemporary forms of visual representation.