A new method called RS-MSVM （Rough Set and Multi-class Support Vector Machine） is proposed for network intrusion detection. This method is based on rough set followed by MSVM for attribute reduction and classificati...A new method called RS-MSVM （Rough Set and Multi-class Support Vector Machine） is proposed for network intrusion detection. This method is based on rough set followed by MSVM for attribute reduction and classification respectively, The number of attributes of the network data used in this paper is reduced from 41 to 30 using rough set theory. The kernel function of HVDM-RBF （Heterogeneous Value Difference Metric Radial Basis Function）, based on the heterogeneous value difference metric of heterogeneous datasets, is constructed for the heterogeneous network data. HVDM-RBF and one-against-one method are applied to build MSVM. DARPA （Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency） intrusion detection evaluating data were used in the experiment. The testing results show that our method outperforms other methods mentioned in this paper on six aspects： detection accuracy, number of support vectors, false positive rate, falsc negative rate, training time and testing time.展开更多
基金Supported by the 863 High Tech. Project (2001AA140213) and the State Key Basic Research Pro-ject (2001CB309403).
文摘A new method called RS-MSVM （Rough Set and Multi-class Support Vector Machine） is proposed for network intrusion detection. This method is based on rough set followed by MSVM for attribute reduction and classification respectively, The number of attributes of the network data used in this paper is reduced from 41 to 30 using rough set theory. The kernel function of HVDM-RBF （Heterogeneous Value Difference Metric Radial Basis Function）, based on the heterogeneous value difference metric of heterogeneous datasets, is constructed for the heterogeneous network data. HVDM-RBF and one-against-one method are applied to build MSVM. DARPA （Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency） intrusion detection evaluating data were used in the experiment. The testing results show that our method outperforms other methods mentioned in this paper on six aspects： detection accuracy, number of support vectors, false positive rate, falsc negative rate, training time and testing time.
