AIM： To evaluate whether adding azithromycin to firstline Helicobacter pylori （H pylorl） eradication improved eradication and reduced side effects. METHODS： Eligible articles were identified by searches of electro...AIM： To evaluate whether adding azithromycin to firstline Helicobacter pylori （H pylorl） eradication improved eradication and reduced side effects. METHODS： Eligible articles were identified by searches of electronic databases. We included all randomized trials that compared azithromycin-containing with standard triple-therapy regimens for first-line treatment of H pylori infection. Statistical analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.0.10. Sub-analyses were also performed. RESULTS： We identified 14 randomized trials （1431 patients）. Pooled Hpylori eradication rates were 72.01% （95% CI： 58.09%-85.93%） and 69.78% （95% CI： 66.47%-73.09%） for patients with or without azithromycin by intention-to-treat analysis, and the odds ratio （OR） was 1.17 （95% CI： 0.64-2.14）. The occurrence of side effects differed significantly and was 15.81% （95% CI： 12.50%-19.12%） and 25.20% （95% CI： 21.44%-28.96%） for treatment with or without azithromycin, respectively, and the summary OR was 0.58 （95% CI： 0.41-0.82）. Furthermore, the azithromycin-containing group had a lower occurrence of diarrhea, nausea and taste disturbance. CONCLUSION： Our review suggests that azithromycincontaining triple-therapy regimens could be equally effective in eradication of Hpylori compared with standard first-line triple-therapy regimens.展开更多
Worldwide prevalence of Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori) infection is approximately 50%,with the highest being in developing countries.We compared cure rates and tolerability(SE) of second-line anti-H.pylori levofloxacin...Worldwide prevalence of Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori) infection is approximately 50%,with the highest being in developing countries.We compared cure rates and tolerability(SE) of second-line anti-H.pylori levofloxacin/amoxicillin(LA)-based triple regimens vs standard quadruple therapy(QT).An English language literature search was performed up to October 2010.A meta-analysis was performed including randomized clinical trials comparing 7-or 10-d LA with 7-d QT.In total,10 articles and four abstracts were identified.Overall eradication rate in LA was 76.5%(95% CI:64.4%-97.6%).When only 7-d regimens were included,cure rate was 70.6%(95% CI:40.2%-99.1%),whereas for 10-d combinations,cure rate was significantly higher(88.7%;95% CI:56.1%-109.9%;P < 0.05).Main eradication rate for QT was 67.4%(95% CI:49.7%-67.9%).The 7-d LA and QT showed comparable efficacy [odds ratio(OR):1.09;95% CI:0.63-1.87],whereas the 10-d LA regimen was significantly more effective than QT(OR:5.05;95% CI:2.74-9.31;P < 0.001;I 2 = 75%).No differences were reported in QT eradication rates among Asian and European studies,whereas LA regimens were more effective in European populations(78.3% vs 67.7%;P = 0.05).Incidence of SE was lower in LA therapy than QT(OR:0.39;95% CI:0.18-0.85;P = 0.02).A higher rate of side effects was reported in Asian patients who received QT.Our findings support the use of 10-d LA as a simple second-line treatment for H.pylori eradication with an excellent eradication rate and tolerability.The optimal second-line alternative scheme might differ among countries depending on quinolone resistance.展开更多
文摘AIM： To evaluate whether adding azithromycin to firstline Helicobacter pylori （H pylorl） eradication improved eradication and reduced side effects. METHODS： Eligible articles were identified by searches of electronic databases. We included all randomized trials that compared azithromycin-containing with standard triple-therapy regimens for first-line treatment of H pylori infection. Statistical analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.0.10. Sub-analyses were also performed. RESULTS： We identified 14 randomized trials （1431 patients）. Pooled Hpylori eradication rates were 72.01% （95% CI： 58.09%-85.93%） and 69.78% （95% CI： 66.47%-73.09%） for patients with or without azithromycin by intention-to-treat analysis, and the odds ratio （OR） was 1.17 （95% CI： 0.64-2.14）. The occurrence of side effects differed significantly and was 15.81% （95% CI： 12.50%-19.12%） and 25.20% （95% CI： 21.44%-28.96%） for treatment with or without azithromycin, respectively, and the summary OR was 0.58 （95% CI： 0.41-0.82）. Furthermore, the azithromycin-containing group had a lower occurrence of diarrhea, nausea and taste disturbance. CONCLUSION： Our review suggests that azithromycincontaining triple-therapy regimens could be equally effective in eradication of Hpylori compared with standard first-line triple-therapy regimens.
文摘Worldwide prevalence of Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori) infection is approximately 50%,with the highest being in developing countries.We compared cure rates and tolerability(SE) of second-line anti-H.pylori levofloxacin/amoxicillin(LA)-based triple regimens vs standard quadruple therapy(QT).An English language literature search was performed up to October 2010.A meta-analysis was performed including randomized clinical trials comparing 7-or 10-d LA with 7-d QT.In total,10 articles and four abstracts were identified.Overall eradication rate in LA was 76.5%(95% CI:64.4%-97.6%).When only 7-d regimens were included,cure rate was 70.6%(95% CI:40.2%-99.1%),whereas for 10-d combinations,cure rate was significantly higher(88.7%;95% CI:56.1%-109.9%;P < 0.05).Main eradication rate for QT was 67.4%(95% CI:49.7%-67.9%).The 7-d LA and QT showed comparable efficacy [odds ratio(OR):1.09;95% CI:0.63-1.87],whereas the 10-d LA regimen was significantly more effective than QT(OR:5.05;95% CI:2.74-9.31;P < 0.001;I 2 = 75%).No differences were reported in QT eradication rates among Asian and European studies,whereas LA regimens were more effective in European populations(78.3% vs 67.7%;P = 0.05).Incidence of SE was lower in LA therapy than QT(OR:0.39;95% CI:0.18-0.85;P = 0.02).A higher rate of side effects was reported in Asian patients who received QT.Our findings support the use of 10-d LA as a simple second-line treatment for H.pylori eradication with an excellent eradication rate and tolerability.The optimal second-line alternative scheme might differ among countries depending on quinolone resistance.
