中国流通产业安全的概念争论、评价方法与指标体系

当前西方主流学界很少关注产业安全,中国国内学术界对此讨论较多,但针对流通产业安全的争论较大,因此在经验度量之前必须详细阐明其中概念逻辑。中国对外开放和引进外资的宏观背景已经发生变化,整体上看"资金瓶颈"已转向"流动性过剩";流通业安全往往是指一种潜在威胁,而非实际状态;外资商业在中国国内地理布局呈典型的非均衡性。为了在经验评价中反映中国流通产业安全的这些理论逻辑,可基于比较性原则、准确性原则和可持续(动态监控)原则设计一套指标体系,并对相应的指标数据进行结构调整和趋势调整,最终得出中国流通产业安全度的测算方法。

社会学视角下我国体育概念之争论

运用社会学视角,介绍我国体育概念争论的历程及主要观点,重点梳理"体育整体观"与"真义体育观"之间的较量过程,对双方代表人物和观点进行评析。从制约因素、非现实性冲突、范式革新等角度,论述我国体育概念争论的发展机制。指出我国体育概念研究中存在的本质论、实体论、还原论、目的论和功能论等误区,提出要综合吸纳社会学等多种理论成果、加强专题学术史的研究、增强批判与反思意识、保持包容通达等建议。

Kuhnian Understanding of Incommensurability and Implications of Paradigmatic Conception of Knowledge in International Relations

In international relations theory （maybe more than in any other discipline of social sciences）, the paradigmatic construction of Thomas Kuhn and his model of incommensurability might be applied to the theoretical interpretation of phenomena; and it is one of the cornerstones of the methodological toolkit for the interpretation in this field. The paper explores the reason why Kuhn＇s understanding of incommensurability seems to be necessary for the conception of knowledge in international relations： the concept of incommensurability can be considered typical as it is meant to indicate a conflict, of one form or another, between theories. And the discipline of international relations is more than a perfect ground for considering this concept when one is having in mind the high degree of polarized debate among rivalry theoretical schools （for interpreting and describing the identical phenomena） that is present from the very beginning of the discipline. Recalling the Kuhnian conception of science in paradigmatic view with an aim for understanding--international relations theory, the paper analyzes furthermore his rejection of the traditional dichotomy between “objectivisn”and ＂subjectivism.＂