Predicate-Argument （PA） structure anal- ysis is often divided into three subtasks： predicate sense disambiguation, argument identification and argument classification mostly been modeled in To date, they have isol...Predicate-Argument （PA） structure anal- ysis is often divided into three subtasks： predicate sense disambiguation, argument identification and argument classification mostly been modeled in To date, they have isolation. However, this approach neglects logical constraints between them. We therefore exploite integrating predicate sense disambiguation with the latter two subtasks respectively, which verifies that the automatic predicate sense disambiguation could help the se- mantic role labeling task. In addition, a dual de- composition algorithm is used to alleviate the er- ror propagation between argument identification subtask and argument classification subtask by benefitting the argument identification subtask greatly. Experiment results show that our ap- proach leads to a better performance with PA a- nalysis than other pipeline approaches.展开更多
文摘Predicate-Argument （PA） structure anal- ysis is often divided into three subtasks： predicate sense disambiguation, argument identification and argument classification mostly been modeled in To date, they have isolation. However, this approach neglects logical constraints between them. We therefore exploite integrating predicate sense disambiguation with the latter two subtasks respectively, which verifies that the automatic predicate sense disambiguation could help the se- mantic role labeling task. In addition, a dual de- composition algorithm is used to alleviate the er- ror propagation between argument identification subtask and argument classification subtask by benefitting the argument identification subtask greatly. Experiment results show that our ap- proach leads to a better performance with PA a- nalysis than other pipeline approaches.
