AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of lactose intolerance (LI) following a load of 12.5 g in patients diagnosed as high-grade malabsorbers using the hydrogen breath test (HBT)-25.METHODS: Ninety patients showing high-gra...AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of lactose intolerance (LI) following a load of 12.5 g in patients diagnosed as high-grade malabsorbers using the hydrogen breath test (HBT)-25.METHODS: Ninety patients showing high-grade malabsorption at HBT-25 were submitted to a second HBT with a lactose load of 12.5 g.Peak hydrogen production,area under the curve of hydrogen excretion and occurrence of symptoms were recorded.RESULTS: Only 16 patients (17.77%) with positive HBT-25 proved positive at HBT-12.5.Hydrogen production was lower as compared to HBT-25 (peak value 21.55 parts per million (ppm) ± 29.54 SD vs 99.43 ppm ± 40.01 SD; P < 0.001).Symptoms were present in only 13 patients.The absence of symptoms during the high-dose test has a high negative predictive value (0.84) for a negative low-dose test.The presence of symptoms during the first test was not useful for predicting a positive low-dose test (positive predictive value 0.06-0.31).CONCLUSION: Most patients with a positive HBT-25 normally absorb a lower dose of lactose and a strict lactose restriction on the basis of a "standard" HBT is,in most instances,unnecessary.Thus,the 25 g lactose tolerance test should probably be substituted by the 12.5 g test in the diagnosis of LI,and in providing dietary guidelines to patients with suspected lactose malabsorption/intolerance.展开更多
文摘AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of lactose intolerance (LI) following a load of 12.5 g in patients diagnosed as high-grade malabsorbers using the hydrogen breath test (HBT)-25.METHODS: Ninety patients showing high-grade malabsorption at HBT-25 were submitted to a second HBT with a lactose load of 12.5 g.Peak hydrogen production,area under the curve of hydrogen excretion and occurrence of symptoms were recorded.RESULTS: Only 16 patients (17.77%) with positive HBT-25 proved positive at HBT-12.5.Hydrogen production was lower as compared to HBT-25 (peak value 21.55 parts per million (ppm) ± 29.54 SD vs 99.43 ppm ± 40.01 SD; P < 0.001).Symptoms were present in only 13 patients.The absence of symptoms during the high-dose test has a high negative predictive value (0.84) for a negative low-dose test.The presence of symptoms during the first test was not useful for predicting a positive low-dose test (positive predictive value 0.06-0.31).CONCLUSION: Most patients with a positive HBT-25 normally absorb a lower dose of lactose and a strict lactose restriction on the basis of a "standard" HBT is,in most instances,unnecessary.Thus,the 25 g lactose tolerance test should probably be substituted by the 12.5 g test in the diagnosis of LI,and in providing dietary guidelines to patients with suspected lactose malabsorption/intolerance.
